Sarah Palin: "They can spend it better than the government".

tonyTheBest

Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2007
Messages
224
This is straight out of Ron Paul's book.
I think we should vote for her because she is the closest one that get our ideas across.
 
Palin 'prepared for war with Russia on Georgia'

:rolleyes: Yeh, she is just like Ron Paul. :rolleyes:

http://news.scotsman.com/world/Palin-39prepared-for-war-with.4488838.jp


Palin 'prepared for war with Russia on Georgia'
(sorry, but your children and grand children need to die to protect our interest in Georgia)



Published Date: 13 September 2008
By CHRIS STEPHEN
SARAH Palin warned yesterday she would be prepared to go to war with Russia to protect Georgia in her first interview since John McCain chose her as his vice-presidential nominee.

Calling Russia's invasion of its neighbor unprovoked, the Republican said she supported Georgia's application to join Nato even if it meant the United States could face a future confrontation with Moscow.

"I mean, that is the agreement when you are a Nato ally. If another country is attacked, you're going to be expected to be called upon to help."

Her comments, broadly in line with the robust stance of Mr McCain, came amid criticism that the McCain camp had kept her away from the press for the fortnight since she was chosen for the ticket.

Opinion polls now show Mr McCain level with, or narrowly leading, Obama nationally.

The Palin interview was by turns feisty and nervous. She told ABC's Charles Gibson that despite having visited only four other countries in her life, and having never met a foreign head of state, she was prepared to take the helm in the event of a mishap befalling 72-year-old Mr McCain.

"I'm ready," she said. "I have the confidence in that readiness and knowing that you can't blink. You have to be wired in a way of being so committed to the mission, the mission that we're on – reform of this country and victory in the war."

She gave enigmatic answers when asked if she would support Israeli strikes against Iranian nuclear installations, and on whether it was right to send troops into Pakistan after Osama bin Laden.

And she seemed off-guard when Gibson asked if she agreed with the Bush doctrine.

"In what respect, Charlie?" said Mrs Palin.

Gibson said: "What do you interpret it to be?"

"I believe that what President Bush has attempted to do is rid this world of Islamic extremism, terrorists who are hell-bent on destroying our nation," she replied.
Gibson said the doctrine was formulated in 2002 and allowed for pre-emptive strikes on nations posing a threat.

"Charlie, if there is a legitimate and enough intelligence that tells us that a strike is imminent against American people, we have every right to defend our country," Mrs Palin said.

Critics judged the performance competent, not inspiring. Some of the answers may have surprised Mrs Palin's boss: Mr McCain is busy courting the green vote and is opposed to oil drilling in Alaskan wildlife refuges, but his running mate insists she supports it.

"We'll agree to disagree," she said, "but I'm gonna keep pushing that and I think eventually we're all gonna come together on that one."

Mrs Palin also appeared confused over her position on climate change, denying she once claimed it was not man-made.

"I have not said that," she said. "Show me where I have ever said that there's absolute proof that nothing man has ever conducted or engaged in has had any effect or no effect on climate change."

In fact, said ABC, she made the claim twice last year, telling one Alaskan newspaper: "I'm not an Al Gore, doom-and-gloom environmentalist, blaming the changes in our climate on human activity."

The interview is likely to further polarise opinion on the woman who all agree has turned this presidential election into a cliffhanger, convincing critics she is inexperienced, and supporters that she is tough and intelligent.

Meanwhile, the Obama campaign, which has stuttered of late, effectively relaunched.

"Today is the first day of the rest of the campaign," Obama campaign manager David Plouffe said in a strategy memo. "We will respond with speed and ferocity to John McCain's attacks and we will take the fight to him, but we will do it on the big issues that matter to the American people."

The newest hard-line ad includes unflattering footage of Mr McCain in the early Eighties, wearing giant glasses and an out-of-style suit, interspersed with shots of a disco ball, a clunky phone, an outdated computer and a Rubik's Cube.

An Obama spokesman said the campaign was not making an issue of 72-year-old Mr McCain's age, but the time he's spent in Washington.
 
This is straight out of Ron Paul's book.
I think we should vote for her because she is the closest one that get our ideas across.

Jesus. If that isn't the worst reason to vote for someone.

They probably made her read it. What do you think she was doing for the week after they made her VP. They probably want her throwing out RP talking points in order to herd in the sheep, but what they don't realize is, we're wolves. Know thy enemy.
 
I happen to agree with the OP. She is the closest one we have to getting a libertarian/conservative minded person into office at this time. She may suck on foreign policy...but a lot of the other things she stands for ..are quite libertarian. If her libertarian side is to have any impact...we need to get her into office where there might be a gnats hair of a chance to start pulling the GOP back to sanity. I wish the Ron Paul supporters would stop subscribing to communist left wing tabloid rag smears against Palin, who this forum loved several months ago. <eyeroll> Tones
 
Jesus. If that isn't the worst reason to vote for someone.

They probably made her read it. What do you think she was doing for the week after they made her VP. They probably want her throwing out RP talking points in order to herd in the sheep, but what they don't realize is, we're wolves. Know thy enemy.

not all wolves, most sheep dogs.
 
I happen to agree with the OP. She is the closest one we have to getting a libertarian/conservative minded person into office at this time. She may suck on foreign policy...but a lot of the other things she stands for ..are quite libertarian. If her libertarian side is to have any impact...we need to get her into office where there might be a gnats hair of a chance to start pulling the GOP back to sanity. I wish the Ron Paul supporters would stop subscribing to communist left wing tabloid rag smears against Palin, who this forum loved several months ago. <eyeroll> Tones

Everytime I hear her talk she's talking war and how John McCain is the one she wants in charge of the troops. If this doesn't scare you to death nothing will. :rolleyes:
 
"I'm ready," she said. "I have the confidence in that readiness and knowing that you can't blink. You have to be wired in a way of being so committed to the mission, the mission that we're on – reform of this country and victory in the war."


This line bothers me. And it should bother all others too. This is the same shoot from the hips mentality of Bush. There is always time to assess a situation and make a clear, rational decision and seeing as how these religious zealots don't understand "reason" this is the most disastrous trait to have as POTUS.
 
This line bothers me. And it should bother all others too. This is the same shoot from the hips mentality of Bush. There is always time to assess a situation and make a clear, rational decision and seeing as how these religious zealots don't understand "reason" this is the most disastrous trait to have as POTUS.

and to add to that... "victory in war", as if war was glorious, and something we can achieve victory in...
The only invasion we face is on our southern border...

I hope, that anyone who votes for that ticket, their children are the first sent to die in Georgia.
 
and to add to that... "victory in war", as if war was glorious, and something we can achieve victory in...
The only invasion we face is on our southern border...

I hope, that anyone who votes for that ticket, their children are the first sent to die in Georgia.

Lets just hope for no war and death in Georgia...
 
She's going to say whatever the fuck she needs to say. She's no different than the rest of those scumbags at the top of the party.
 
Okay, so we know that the Alaskan bulldog with lipstick can read. Maybe she should have been Bush's VP because they are equally daft. A vote for McCain is a vote for World War III. I would never put that weight on my back.
 
This is straight out of Ron Paul's book.
I think we should vote for her because she is the closest one that get our ideas across.

fail_20at_20failing.jpg
 
Back
Top