Sarah Palin Reads Answers off of Her Hand. What a shame!

huffington post? i didnt realize libertarians were such hard leftist govt types.

i will take sarah palin over you and the pro govt huffington post anytime.

I think this forums is hijacked by the the liberals and I said it all along.
 
Yes, pull that string and hear the same rhetoric of George W. Bush. Neocons can easily manipulate those with lesser intelligence; Sarah Palin is another simple-minded dope being used to sing the same tune. And really, what's greater than murdering more brown people in the Middle East?

Republicans are generally imbecilic, like the average American, they're easily impressed by shiny and pretty things; if Sarah Palin looked like Madelaine Albright, she'd be in Alaskan obscurity drawing in coloring books and not her hand, and not giving a keynote speech to a bunch cheering, fellow idiots.

You know what? this forums are more about against Palin than against the Democats because they are hijacked by the liberals.

She is great. She read her talking points so what? She is not the president or running for it.

We've got a PHD president "Woodrow Wilson" who set America on this destructive path, a Rhodes scholar president "Clinton" who repealed the Glass-Steagall that created this recession right now, a Havard educated president "Obama" who put this nation in a dangerous path. Please criticize not Palin. She is great.

Think liberals think, I hate liberals.
 
Why is this forum constantly inundated with Palin threads? How many RPers would seriously vote for her, hence the waste of time.
 
Yes, pull that string and hear the same rhetoric of George W. Bush. Neocons can easily manipulate those with lesser intelligence; Sarah Palin is another simple-minded dope being used to sing the same tune. And really, what's greater than murdering more brown people in the Middle East?

Republicans are generally imbecilic, like the average American, they're easily impressed by shiny and pretty things; if Sarah Palin looked like Madelaine Albright, she'd be in Alaskan obscurity drawing in coloring books and not her hand, and not giving a keynote speech to a bunch cheering, fellow idiots.

Whoa. I agreed with you up to the ridiculous point of "Murdering brown people"? Are you seriously going there? You're as delusional as the people you're ridiculing.
 
You know what? this forums are more about against Palin than against the Democats because they are hijacked by the liberals.

She is great. She read her talking points so what? She is not the president or running for it.

We've got a PHD president "Woodrow Wilson" who set America on this destructive path, a Rhodes scholar president "Clinton" who repealed the Glass-Steagall that created this recession right now, a Havard educated president "Obama" who put this nation in a dangerous path. Please criticize not Palin. She is great.

Think liberals think, I hate liberals.

i agree with you again tony, this board to be rather elitist. one more thing they agree with liberals about. i dont agree with the board in thinking only the ivy league elite can govern us. i welcome decent people like palin and i dispute the elitist position taken here.
 
You know what? this forums are more about against Palin than against the Democats because they are hijacked by the liberals.

She is great. She read her talking points so what? She is not the president or running for it.

We've got a PHD president "Woodrow Wilson" who set America on this destructive path, a Rhodes scholar president "Clinton" who repealed the Glass-Steagall that created this recession right now, a Havard educated president "Obama" who put this nation in a dangerous path. Please criticize not Palin. She is great.

Think liberals think, I hate liberals.

Oh gawd. The folks over at HotAir and Hannity are coming! Hey Tony, if you really want to learn about how we got into this mess head on over to www.mises.org, or read you know, Thomas Woods Meltdown book, but I doubt any Neo-Con is going to read libertarian literature.

While you are at it, read this marvelous piece by the Tannehills:

http://mises.org/daily/4021
 
Last edited:
Whoa. I agreed with you up to the ridiculous point of "Murdering brown people"? Are you seriously going there? You're as delusional as the people you're ridiculing.

I thought that was the easiest sarcasm on the internet to spot. Guess not :D
 
Last edited:
Who brought all the GOP lite in? If your loyalty lie more to party than to principle, follow Sarah to your hearts content. You are the Obamabots of the GOP.
 
i agree with you again tony, this board to be rather elitist. one more thing they agree with liberals about. i dont agree with the board in thinking only the ivy league elite can govern us. i welcome decent people like palin and i dispute the elitist position taken here.

Yes, that is why we fawn over Adam Kokesh. /sarcasm.
 
You know what? this forums are more about against Palin than against the Democats because they are hijacked by the liberals.

She is great. She read her talking points so what? She is not the president or running for it.

We've got a PHD president "Woodrow Wilson" who set America on this destructive path, a Rhodes scholar president "Clinton" who repealed the Glass-Steagall that created this recession right now, a Havard educated president "Obama" who put this nation in a dangerous path. Please criticize not Palin. She is great.

Think liberals think, I hate liberals.

Blah blah "liberals" blah blah "mainstream media" blah blah "Democrats" yada yada.

Listen: I'm not aware of any prominent liberals trying to co-opt a libertarian, or even semi-libertarian movement, while actually being a neo-con puppet. There wouldn't be as many Sarah Palin threads on here if there weren't actually Sarah Palin fans who continually insist that she wants what Ron Paul wants, or even something remotely akin to it.

She is a (less than) 1 term governor, supporter of bailouts and John McCain, friend of Bill Kristol, moron. To criticize her is not to defend liberalism. However, to defend her IS a middle finger to libertarianism.

Instead of whining how she is treated here, just go to the Free Republic and join other Palin sycophants.
 
i agree with you again tony, this board to be rather elitist. one more thing they agree with liberals about. i dont agree with the board in thinking only the ivy league elite can govern us. i welcome decent people like palin and i dispute the elitist position taken here.

There is nothing wrong with normal people from different walks of life talking leadership roles in our representative government . However, Beck even admitted that Palin isn't ready to be president. She clearly does not have the depth of intelligence at this point. She has limited understanding of the constitution and the framers. She associates herself with questionable characters.
 
Oh gawd. The folks over at HotAir and Hannity are coming! Hey Tony, if you really want to learn about how we got into this mess head on over to www.mises.org, or read you know, Thomas Woods Meltdown book, but I doubt any Neo-Con is going to read libertarian literature.

Austrian Econ, I know how we got into this mess. I started from Woodrow Wilson, Nixon, Clinton...
My previous post was to show that high educated presidents do not always give America its best interests.
 
Last edited:
I think this forums is hijacked by the the liberals and I said it all along.

let me get this straight...

opposition to that Kristol controlled, low IQ, narcistic, war mongering, neo-con fake from Alaska makes me a "liberal???"

have you ever stopped to think that this whole left-right thing is just a show?...like professional wrestling?....

thinking people understand that Palin and Obama are just two different wings of the same predatory vulture..

the R's and the D's are just competing crime families who both support big government and murdering brown people for the sake of Israel and the New World Order
 
Did you read the post? It screamed sarcasm, hence, the easiest bit.

It's the 4th time I've seen it in 2 weeks. We have some fools who believe this. I corrected another boob with the same point. To somehow infer that the Iraqi and Afghanistan campaign is more justified because Arabs have more melanin in their skin is preposterous.
 
Last edited:
"normal people from different walks of life talking leadership roles in our representative government"

You hit it directly on the head; with democracies every person has an opportunity to expropriate from their fellow citizens with out consequence.
 
Austrian Econ, I know how we got into this mess. I started from Woodrow Wilson, Nixon, Clinton...
My previous post was to show that high educated presidents do not always give America its best interests.

Yep, another one who has no problem with the coercive violence of government, just pissy that 'his' candidate isn't in office, and the violence isn't being used to meet 'his' ends.

You can put lipstick on a neo-con, it's still a neo-con.
 
Austrian Econ, I know how we got into this mess. I started from Woodrow Wilson, Nixon, Clinton...
My previous post was to show that high educated presidents do not always give America its best interests.

If you spent any amount of time on the forum you would know the feeling on this board toward the Establishment and Central Planners. We cherish philosophy, and generally you do not find this amount of knowledge in the average American. Hence, we usually look up to higher educational figures like those in the LvMI, Libertarian Professors, and libertarian leaders like the Tannehills, Ron Paul, Patrick Henry, T. Jefferson, Mary Ruwart, Harry Browne, et. al.

Obviously if we fawned over such elitists at Ivy Leagues we would surely hate our very own Gunny? Right? Come on.
 
Back
Top