Rick Santorum Santorum Defends Stance On Anti-Sodomy Laws

Agorism

Banned
Joined
Dec 18, 2009
Messages
12,663
Rick Santorum Blasts Gay Marriage Supporters, Defends Support For Anti-Sodomy Laws

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/25/rick-santorum-gay-marriage-sodomy_n_1030513.html

Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum touted his support for anti-sodomy laws and said gay marriage supporters wanted to "drive faith out of the public square" in an interview with controversial preacher Bradlee Dean, founder of You Can Run But You Cannot Hide International, a Christian punk-rock youth ministry based in Minnesota.

"And I stood up from the very beginning back in 2003 when the Supreme Court was going create a constitutional right to sodomy and said this is wrong we can't do this," said Santorum, according to the Minnesota Independent. "And so I stood up when no one else did and got hammered for it. I stood up and I continue to stand up."

In 2003, then-Sen. Santorum (R-Pa.) defended anti-sodomy laws in an interview with the Associated Press because "they were there for a purpose." He added, in a quote that became infamous, "In every society, the definition of marriage has not ever to my knowledge included homosexuality. That's not to pick on homosexuality. It's not, you know, man on child, man on dog, or whatever the case may be." Santorum then developed a "Google problem" with the highest search results for his name linking back to a page created by gay rights activist and author Dan Savage associating his name with a sexual neologism.

Santorum later wrote in a 2003 USA Today op-ed, "the greatest near-term consequence of the Lawrence v. Texas anti-sodomy ruling could be the legalization of homosexual marriage." The Court struck down a Texas anti-sodomy statute, overruling a 1986 ruling upholding a similar Georgia statue.

"This is not about gay marriage, it is about changing what is right and wrong and fundamentally changing what people of faith can say and do in society," said Santorum to Dean. "The ultimate objective here is to drive faith out of the public square, to drive morality out of the laws of this country, to secularize our society with a different set of values."

Santorum said recently that he would "die on that hill" fighting same-sex marriage. He has polled in low single-digits nationally in recent Republican primary polls.

Dean himself has made numerous controversial comments about homosexuality, including saying executing homosexuals is moral and alleging that Thomas Jefferson and George Washington wanted to make homosexuality illegal.
 
Santorum's simplistic idea of government power as something that can be applied as a universal panacea, to stamp out anything he personally finds icky without any dire consequences or resultant human suffering reminds me of myself at about 16 years old. Unfortunately, politicians never seem to grow out of that impulse.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, now I remember the reason I absolutely detest this guy....he can be the GOP attack dog, but I want him no where near Ron Paul and his administartion when elected.
 
I wish I could combine Santorum on social issues with Ron Paul on the rest. With that combo, we'd almost have someone as good as Pat Buchanan. Almost, because no one will ever be as good as Pat.

Liberty in packages is no liberty at all.
 
This is why I despise Santorum.

What two consenting adults want to do with each other is no one's fucking business. Its their choice.

Also, why do these people have such trouble understanding that marriage is a religious matter. The government needs to stay the fuck out of it.

The simple existance of a "marriage license" is a joke, and a problem.

State managed civil unions for tax purposes, fine, but marriage is and always will be a religious issue.
 
Sodomy laws are also rape laws, and the original story in the Bible is about gang rape.

Just pointing that out, as it is a distinction that is important. I'm not saying homosexuality isn't a sin, but many sodomy laws are on the books which mean laws about rape.
 
I wish I could combine Santorum on social issues with Ron Paul on the rest. With that combo, we'd almost have someone as good as Pat Buchanan. Almost, because no one will ever be as good as Pat.

But no combination of anything is as good as the crack you're smoking.

In one sentence:
It makes no sense to address voluntary homosexuality by locking homosexuals in cages where they're going to be having lots of involuntary homosexual sex.

Unless you want to kill them off, that is.
 
But no combination of anything is as good as the crack you're smoking.

In one sentence:
It makes no sense to address voluntary homosexuality by locking homosexuals in cages where they're going to be having lots of involuntary homosexual sex.

Unless you want to kill them off, that is.

I'm sure Santorum would be fine with that. Just start an undeclared war on gays, and he'll get right behind it.
Of course, then it's okay to just off them without trial, right?
 
Yes, I do. I am a Constitution Party supporter, a paleo-con. I am not a Libertarian.


Fair enough.

The question I should have asked is, do you believe in Federal anti-sodomy laws? And if so, where do you believe the constitution authorizes such laws?
 
I don't support gay marriage, but using the government to control what people do in their own bedrooms goes way too far in my opinion. That's the ultimate example of big government.
 
It's none of the government's business what goes on in the bedroom. And if two adults want to be together, LET THEM. Unless they are harming you, it's none of your business.

Santorum is a creep.
 
So how do they enforce such a thing? Do they place a camera in every room of every home?
 
Back
Top