Same-sex marriage could lead to a parent claiming marriage to his/her kid to gain tax benefits

Joined
May 1, 2010
Messages
6,870
WASHINGTON (AP) -- A Republican Senate candidate in Kentucky said that same-sex marriage could lead to a parent claiming marriage to his or her child to gain tax benefits and other privileges.

Bevin told a Christian radio program hosted by Janet Mefferd: "If it's all right to have same-sex marriages, why not define a marriage — because at the end of the day, a lot of this ends up being taxes and who can visit who in the hospital, and there's other repercussions and things that come with this —so a person may want to define themselves as being married to one of their children so that they could then in fact pass on certain things to that child financially and otherwise."

"Where do you draw the line?" he said. "And if, in fact, a person can arbitrarily draw it here, why not could someone else draw it arbitrarily draw it somewhere else?"

Bevin spokeswoman Rachel Semmel said Bevin was not connecting gay marriage with incest. She said he was speaking of questions such as "hospital visitations and benefits."

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/gay-marriage-issue-flares-kentucky-180623486.html
 
If the kid is over 18 perhaps. Wonder about those states that allow marriages younger with parental consent. Really weird that some states allow girls to marry younger with consent than guys.

Really stretching his arguments... Inheritance taxes for parents / kids didn't really hit until over 2 million. A simple living will handles the hospitals just fine.
 
Doesn't sound any worse than what Ted Nugent did which was adopting a girl he couldn't legally marry in order to sleep with her.
 
"Where do you draw the line?" he said. "And if, in fact, a person can arbitrarily draw it here, why not could someone else draw it arbitrarily draw it somewhere else?"

Bevin spokeswoman Rachel Semmel said Bevin was not connecting gay marriage with incest. She said he was speaking of questions such as "hospital visitations and benefits."
The real problem here, as it is everywhere, is government involvement.

Exactly. Allow hospitals to set their own policies for visitation & such - and keep the State OUT of it.
Allow beneficiaries to designate their own inheritors. (Or better yet, stop handing out government benefits altogether.)
Hitching those kinds of things to the "marriage" wagon is just an artificial & arbitrary means of exerting power & control.

This is exactly the same sort of crap we see when it comes to government involvement in "public" schools (as manifested, for example, in the endlessly pointless and utterly unnecessary divisiveness over things like "Creationism" vs. "Evolution").

Bevin's arbitrary "line drawing" is no better than anyone else's. No matter where the line is drawn, it will still be bitterly argued and fought over. The only viable "solution" is for the State to simply stop drawing such lines. (I put "solution" in quotes because there actually isn't any real "problem" to begin with - the "problem" only exists because the State has manufactured it.)
 
In this case, over 18 adults should not have right to consent and their "civil rights" should be oppressed by man made Courts. God also did not intend even consenting adult brother-brother same sex marriages even if they are conseting adults ( or sister-sister same sex marriages) and courts can deny their "civil rights" in these cases.

SWC Obama handlers may have opened can of worms.
 
Last edited:
aaaaaand...... this goes here. I am my own grandpa.


I remember a comedy song on the morning radio show, set to dueling banjos. I found some of the lyrics on line, but I couldn't find who sang it or what it is called. Here are the lyrics.
Well, I've known my sister all my life,
that is why she's now my wife,
and my son,I think he know's it's true,
he's my nephew too,

Well, my father he's my uncle Joe,
and my mama she's my dear aunt Flo,
that is why it's plain to see,
my first cousin is ME
 
To be fair, once your wife becomes old and haggard when she turns 30, a replacement becomes necessary.
 
I often say that I'm waiting with baited breath until polygamy comes to town.
Then, with same-sex marriage and polygamy, I'm going to drive my van to 7-11 every month and pack it with guys who will get all my house construction done in a jiffy.

And I won't even have to pay them.
I'll just marry them all. They get citizenship, I get construction. Win-win!
 
I often say that I'm waiting with baited breath until polygamy comes to town.
Then, with same-sex marriage and polygamy, I'm going to drive my van to 7-11 every month and pack it with guys who will get all my house construction done in a jiffy.

And I won't even have to pay them.
I'll just marry them all. They get citizenship, I get construction. Win-win!

Morally, I have an issue with this kind of mockery of the institution of marriage, despite the fact that it gives govt. the middle finger.
 
Morally, I have an issue with this kind of mockery of the institution of marriage, despite the fact that it gives govt. the middle finger.

what exactly is this institution of marriage? where did you get it from and what do we do to its mockers?
 
FF, I'm almost certain you do, but I will ask..

Do you have a problem with the mockery that the government has made of marriage?

I feel this issue should be stressed. Every person here (to be a Merican) is licensed ten times to Tuesday, including marriage. I can almost assume you are against all of this. Perhaps someone stops by or perhaps your position would be more palatable to those who don't adhere to the Bible if you also use a freedom approach?

The "government" has no authority in marriage. Simply put.
 
Back
Top