Running mate?

You need someone that can cement Ron Paul into the Presidency. I say Pat Buchanan as he won't be controlled by the Elite and has a good sized following by himself.
 
I really like Pat, but the ADL would have a field day; especially with all the lies going around claiming Dr. Paul is racist.

Having Dr. Williams as his running mate, would make it rather hard for the slanderers to make hay with their lies, now wouldn't it. Plus Williams is a good man.
 
I'm hearing rumors that it might be this guy
http://www.gmu.edu/departments/economics/wew/

For those of you not famliar with him, all I can say is holy shit! Could anyone come up with something better than this?


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

He certainly has an impressive resume!

While he might very well be a great VP, I'm wondering if he wouldn't be better suited as Treasury Secretary, considering the changes (deemed controversial by many) RP wants to bring about (e.g. eliminating the IRS & Fed Reserve, bringing back the gold standard). WW's credentials in Economics might help assuage some of those concerns.

Moreover, his age (71?) might be a strike against him for VP, as a heavily "senior" ticket could be a concern to voters.




http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Department_of_the_Treasury


Responsibilities
Treasury Department official, surrounded by packages of newly minted currency, counting and wrapping dollar bills. Washington, D.C., 1907.
Treasury Department official, surrounded by packages of newly minted currency, counting and wrapping dollar bills. Washington, D.C., 1907.

The basic functions of the Department of the Treasury include:

* Managing Federal finances;
* Collecting taxes, duties and monies paid to and due to the U.S. and paying all bills of the U.S.;
* Producing all postage stamps, currency and coinage;
* Managing Government accounts and the U.S. public debt;
* Supervising national banks and thrift institutions;
* Advising on domestic and international financial, monetary, economic, trade and tax policy - fiscal policy being the sum of these, and the ultimate responsibility of Congress.
* Enforcing Federal finance and tax laws;
* Investigating and prosecuting tax evaders, counterfeiters, forgers, smugglers, illicit spirits distillers, and gun law violators.

With respect to the estimation of revenues for the executive branch, Treasury serves a purpose parallel to that of the Office of Management and Budget for the estimation of spending for the executive branch, the Joint Committee on Taxation for the estimation of revenues for Congress, and the Congressional Budget Office for the estimation of spending for Congress.

The term Treasury reform usually refers narrowly to reform of monetary policy and related economic policy and accounting reform. The broader term monetary reform usually refers to reform of policy of institutions such as the International Monetary Fund.
 
Last edited:
He would be an outstanding VP I think. Even though he's old, it would be awsome. Like a couple of wise sages or oracles guiding us back to glory.
 
Remember that we're talking about a VICE-president. RP still has all the real juice.

Someone who could really "seal the deal" on bipartisanship, and look strong on defense/security... Chuck Hagel.

He's reached across the aisle when others wouldn't. He's a distinguished serviceman. He reminded Bush that Impeachment is a vehicle for stopping an out of control "C-I-C".

Hagel brings alot to the table.
 
That's not a half bad idea. Tancredo is too annoying, I think, to be of much use politically. Sure, immigration is bad, but is it slaughtering americans daily? I doubt it.
 
Tancredo's also already looking to scale back his campaign. Supposedly, over the Immigration issue.

Hagel, otoh, is still "waiting in the wings". And in interviews, he comes across as a "walk softly, and carry a big stick" kinda guy. Which I like. As opposed to Bush and Cheney's wanna-be-bully style.

I've run this combo passed more than a few that seemed to really like the idea.
 
Corsi maybe? He has been approached by the Constitution party, but they would probably part ways on the non-interventionism thing...

Still, it might be a strong ticket for anti-NAU/Police State and Pro-Constitution.
 
If he were running as an independent that would be different, of course.

I think the dynamics of a third party bid won't change much of anything. Except that in a third party, he has to market himself more to the dems. Less republicans will vote for him unless he is listed as a republican, so he'll need all the indy and dem votes he can get.

Lets be honest. The republicans, sorry, Neocons and the powers-that-be are going to do whatever they can to stop anyone from voting for Ron Paul; starting with airtime as we have seen. Ron Paul's message is clear and hasn't changed in 30 some odd years. We have to get the message out to the uninformed; because the message is, in this case, very powerful.

As the message gets out, as it is now, other Republicans in the race are going to start copying that message. Nothing will change from a mass media perspective when/if he runs as an independent.

Internet and literal footwork are Ron's only hope to get numbers high enough to win.

I hope, that Dr Paul will somehow pull this off, but there is so so much against him. Including the voting machines. Deep in our souls, intellectually, we know Paul is the only person who should be president. And it would benefit Dem's, IND, Rep, and Libs if he was elected. (note: someone make a video showing why each individual party should vote for Dr Paul)

Paul needs to be marketed as a vote for America's future. For our children and for us NOW!
 
Chuck Hagel--No Way!

Chuck Hagel?

Thoughts?
Chuck Hagel is a favorite of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and has spoken with the CFR's president in Washington, DC. There is no way he would align himself with Dr. Paul and I don't think Dr. Paul would want to align himself with an internationalist.

Hagel may be expressing some populist views, but it may be just a CFR tactic to put someone on the stage with a "softer" interventionist record than the hardcore neo-cons, but make no mistake, Hagel is all for the CFR's internationalist agenda.

http://www.cfr.org/publication/9220/
 
Chuck Hagel is a favorite of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and has spoken with the CFR's president in Washington, DC. There is no way he would align himself with Dr. Paul and I don't think Dr. Paul would want to align himself with an internationalist.

Hagel may be expressing some populist views, but it may be just a CFR tactic to put someone on the stage with a "softer" interventionist record than the hardcore neo-cons, but make no mistake, Hagel is all for the CFR's internationalist agenda.

http://www.cfr.org/publication/9220/

I just read that, and point to several things.

First, November 2005. That was then, this is NOW.

Second, a few quotes:

To question your government is not unpatriotic—to not question your government is unpatriotic. America owes its men and women in uniform a policy worthy of their sacrifices.

As we consider the regional context of stability and security in Iraq, there is another issue that we must deal with—a relationship between the United States and Iran. The fact that our two governments cannot—or will not—sit down to exchange views must end.

Terrorism is a real threat and a present danger that we must confront and defeat. But we must not sacrifice the strengths and ideals of America that the world has come to respect and trust, and that define us.

The American people should demand that the President request a Declaration of War and the Congress formally declare war, if and when the President believes that committing American troops is in the vital national security interests of this country. This would make the President and Congress, together, accountable for their actions—just as the Founders of our country intended.


Third, sometimes, people join an institution to change from within. Like ME joining the GOP to support Dr. Paul in the primaries. It is NOT because I support the directions and policies that the NeoCons have driven in the party for the last 7 years.

People like Alex Jones go a bit overboard sometimes. Angelina Jolie I read is joining the CFR. But I seriously doubt SHE is some insidious threat to America.

I think Hagel has some serious strong points he can bring to the table, and he sends a message of bipartisanship.

Dr. Paul is a very wise man who can make up his own mind.
 
Most of the people on the CFR are not members of the global elite, and think they are genuinely helping America and the world with their policies/membership. Not everyone who is a member is an elitist globalist NWO supporter (in fact, most probably aren't) - membership does not necessarily define a motive.
 
running mate?

ok folks,
got some interesting choices for vp..........isn't that a little of the cart before the horse?
i mean we've all thought of it.........if it comes to that and i sure as heck hope it does....then i know that whoever dr. paul chooses will be the right choice.
although i do like the idea of willie as vp! what a riot! a long haired, ganja smoking, bio diesel powered country western singer!!! wouldn't that beat all!
although, badnarik is certainly a logical choice....
 
Back
Top