RULE CHANGE: 8 States needed to be put into Nomination

We have liberty lovers who control the State GOPs of Nevada, Iowa, Alaska, and in the short future hopefully Maine. If you control the state GOP structure it will be more likely that your people (aka liberty folks) get certified to go to the National Convention and they will have input to writing the rules. The people elected to the actual RNC from those states will be liberty folks. So the goals should shift from the National Level to taking over the State GOPs.
We're well on the way here in SW Missouri. I haven't got a full report yet but in the counties I've been in contact with - including my own - we are controlling the county committees and getting offices in the state congressional and senatorial district committees. Next week will be larger meetings.
 
I would like to see all of this corruption and cheating exposed in a major mainstream documentary. Michael Moore? Morgan Sperlock? There has to be somebody out there who is in the business of making documentaries about bad people doing bad things who would jump on this if only there was a way to bring it to their attention what a killer and shocking movie this will make. (I have mixed feelings about Michael Moore but I do know he certainly wouldn't pull any punches... Whoever does it I would just want them to be honest, not embellish, there is no need, the truth is bad enough.)

Anybody have any Hollywood-type connections?
 
There's that guy who made "Elektable"... and William Lewis, other names I could find given a little time.
 
It didn't matter which ones they took, what mattered is that they reduced the amount of states we won so that we could not place Dr. Paul's name in nomination.

No, I think it does matter. If our people made mistakes in ME and LA, then we need to learn from those mistakes rather than sweeping them under the rug pretending everything is the establishment's fault. Notice I said "if"
 
Because they only needed to ensure that Paul did not have the 5 states he needed to be guaranteed 15 minutes of unedited speaking time at the convention.

No shit, but that's not my point. My point is, why did they pick on ME and LA rather than IA and MN? If our people actually made mistakes at the ME and LA conventions, even if small mistakes, then we should learn from them.

The IA, MN, and NV conventions must have been error-free. Do you really think the RNC would seat those delegations if they had any sort of grounds to challenge them?
 
Back
Top