RP vs. Mitt virtually tied in this poll

[Kludge]

Whoever posted this is a moron:

"Posted on Mar 26, 2009 at 8:43 AM by romneybot: Hmmm, the kooky racist and anti-semitic wRong Paul is winning the poll. I've been using my bots all night to vote Romney, yet it seems those crazy paultards are a lot stronger."

 

[ronpaulhawaii]

We are the movement that wants to promote ethics, it is usually best to lead by example. Is this battle in the tubez being documented on blogs? If indeed, we are in the right here, (I posted it to a couple pretty big lists yesterday) and did not start the battle, we can probably gain more ground by taking the high ground, than by proving to them we can spam better...

my$00.02

busy, busy...

 

[Rangeley]

We are the movement that wants to promote ethics, it is usually best to lead, by example. Is this battle in the tubez being documented on blogs? If indeed, we are in the right here, (I posted it to a couple pretty big lists yesterday) and did not start the battle, we can probably gain more ground by taking the high ground, than by proving to them we can spam better...

my$00.02

busy, busy...

Spamming the poll hurts our reputation, spamming the chat room hurts our reputation. Why do you think they blocked me for saying noone should be doing it, while they let people like "romneybot" keep on talking?

 

[acptulsa]

And I still say only in self defense. This time was self defense. I do think it would be wise of us to wait until we're sure it is, indeed, self defense.

But don't wait so long we can't successfully defend ourselves.

That way we demonstrate that we're moral, but not too moral to win. In order to impress Republican primary voters, I believe the latter is the only necessary part as a general rule, but I would still prefer to demonstrate both.

Who says you can't have your cake and eat it too?

 

[Invalid]

I'm fired up (you link) that we're defeating the Romney ppl in the spammer poll

 

[Invalid]

As Michael Steele would say...Get ready to get knocked over (link).

 

[Alawn]

And why? If people see Pence beating Palin... how does this poll have any credibility in anyones eyes? Palin should be the winner of her side and face Ron Paul at the end, or in the very least beat Mike Pence.

Because it is Palin. She destroyed McCain's chances at winning. Nominating her next time would be the worst thing they could ever do. A complete unknown has more chance at winning than her. It doesn't matter what you really think of her. The nations perception of her is that she is the most retarded failure ever. Nominating her is trying to lose.

 

[specsaregood]

./

 

[Rangeley]

Because it is Palin. She destroyed McCain's chances at winning. Nominating her next time would be the worst thing they could ever do. A complete unknown has more chance at winning than her. It doesn't matter what you really think of her. The nations perception of her is that she is the most retarded failure ever. Nominating her is trying to lose.

Im not saying shes a good candidate at all, just that people are less likely to take the poll seriously if a political unknown knocks Palin off in round 2. I guess its a moot point now, but whatever.

 

[Alawn]

do the brackets look wrong or is it just me? number 1 and 6 would not play in the second round?

You are right. The brackets are totally wrong. Whoever did this does not know which spot to put people in. About half of the numbers are in the wrong spot. 6 shouldn't even be on the top half. Ron Paul should actually be going against Sanford this round.

 

[acptulsa]

Because it is Palin. She destroyed McCain's chances at winning.

Um, I think McCain picked her because she made him look smart. Much like Dubya's daddy and Little Danny Quayle.

McCain was born to lose.

 

[Alawn]

Im not saying shes a good candidate at all, just that people are less likely to take the poll seriously if a political unknown knocks Palin off in round 2. I guess its a moot point now, but whatever.

I don't think people will take it seriously if she wins. Her career is over. Nobody will ever take her seriously again. You would have to be a convicted rapist to lose to her in an election.

 

[coyote_sprit]

Im not saying shes a good candidate at all, just that people are less likely to take the poll seriously if a political unknown knocks Palin off in round 2. I guess its a moot point now, but whatever.

Many people will vote for anybody Palin is going against simply our of spite. Whether they are an unkown or a celebrity.

 

[StilesBC]

voted for ron, sanford and demint. Don't care about the rest.

 

[Rangeley]

Bump. Romney is surging tons, its changed a few percentages in just the last few minutes.

* Mitt Romney
41%
* Ron Paul
58%
Total Votes: 122,472

 

[Rangeley]

* Mitt Romney
44%
* Ron Paul
55%
Total Votes: 130,234

 

[Conza88]

Keep an eye on it... may be time to restart the engines

 

[Rangeley]

* Mitt Romney
48%
* Ron Paul
51%
Total Votes: 140,794

 

[AdamT]

50% RP 49% Romney....calling all bots.

 

[coyote_sprit]

I can't be there right now.