max
Banned
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2007
- Messages
- 4,453
RP's people have only managed a small congressional race. This is a different animal and there performance to date has been awful. Iowa was an opportunity for a breakout that will now be delayed.
It's almost September and we're still playing the "Who is Ron Paul" game. A Iowa victory or a 2nd place would have gotten us past this "Who is" stage. Thats why Iowa was important.
They totally blew it by not fighting and barely spending anytime in Iowa. . Iowa was not a setback, but nor was it the boost we could have easily had had if they spent some time and money there.
The ads they ran in Iowa SUCKED!
They need to directly ATTACK the front runners. Brownback did well because he boldly attacked Romney while RP's people were running TV ads about "Letters of Mark and Reprisal?"....are you fucking kidding me?
Huckabeee did well because of his pro-life message because Iowans WERE NOT EVEN AWARE that RP was a baby doctor with impeccible pro-life credentials.
Tancredo did well because he stressed the immigration issue while Iowans weren't aware that RP is just as solid as Tancredo on immigration.
RP should be ATTACKING the vulnerable frontrunners relentlessly while making his name synonymous with abolition of the IRS and the folly of this war. How about some TV ads with coffins of dead and maimed US troops? How about an ad showing what RP said during the first debate when he was asked about shutting down the IRS and replied "immediately"
Emotional hot buttons and images are what triggers publicity and interest. Ron Paul's two greatest moments were one : 1. When he was asked about abolishing the IRS during MSNBC debate...and 2. When Rudy went after him (altough RP blew a chance to hit back at Rudy)
If RP's campaign people continue to play nice-nice with these milk toast ads.....they'll never inspire the masses. There is a reason why the Establishment media bitches about "negative ads"......THEY WORK!
Anyone who thinks RP has a shot at this WITHOUT running hard hitting ATTACK ads is living in a fantasy.
It's almost September and we're still playing the "Who is Ron Paul" game. A Iowa victory or a 2nd place would have gotten us past this "Who is" stage. Thats why Iowa was important.
They totally blew it by not fighting and barely spending anytime in Iowa. . Iowa was not a setback, but nor was it the boost we could have easily had had if they spent some time and money there.
The ads they ran in Iowa SUCKED!
They need to directly ATTACK the front runners. Brownback did well because he boldly attacked Romney while RP's people were running TV ads about "Letters of Mark and Reprisal?"....are you fucking kidding me?
Huckabeee did well because of his pro-life message because Iowans WERE NOT EVEN AWARE that RP was a baby doctor with impeccible pro-life credentials.
Tancredo did well because he stressed the immigration issue while Iowans weren't aware that RP is just as solid as Tancredo on immigration.
RP should be ATTACKING the vulnerable frontrunners relentlessly while making his name synonymous with abolition of the IRS and the folly of this war. How about some TV ads with coffins of dead and maimed US troops? How about an ad showing what RP said during the first debate when he was asked about shutting down the IRS and replied "immediately"
Emotional hot buttons and images are what triggers publicity and interest. Ron Paul's two greatest moments were one : 1. When he was asked about abolishing the IRS during MSNBC debate...and 2. When Rudy went after him (altough RP blew a chance to hit back at Rudy)
If RP's campaign people continue to play nice-nice with these milk toast ads.....they'll never inspire the masses. There is a reason why the Establishment media bitches about "negative ads"......THEY WORK!
Anyone who thinks RP has a shot at this WITHOUT running hard hitting ATTACK ads is living in a fantasy.