Swordsmyth
Member
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2016
- Messages
- 74,737
Or crazy might destroy liberty.
It depends on what kind of crazy, Moore has the right kind.
You on the other hand.............
Or crazy might destroy liberty.
It depends on what kind of crazy, Moore has the right kind.
You on the other hand.............
Moore wanted to have a duly elected Senator denied his seat simply because Moore didn't like his religion. That isn't liberty. Liberty is supposed to be for everybody- not just white Christians.
Moore shouldn't concede until the recount is completed.
He will not concede and massive amounts of voter fraud will be shown.
Trump and Bannon are playing that they want him to concede, so it doesn’t look planned.
But from the rumors going around, this was all planned, in order to expose Soros and the Democratic Party fraudulent practices.
I pray these rumors are right.
Either way, a ridiculous amount of swamp creatures are not running for election again, McCain is rolling around in a boot which mysteriously switches to the other leg (he will be gone soon if not in jail), Clinton is wearing hers for a ridiculous long time for a simple toe fracture, over 4000 indictments are still sealed, Ryan is going bye bye, taxes are going down, the market hit highs every week, an estimated 6000+ people have been arrested in pedophile rings across the nation since Trump was elected....
And all in less than a year.
May God bless our President and may he continue to destroy the Deep State, one swamp creature at a time.
He will not concede and massive amounts of voter fraud will be shown.
Trump and Bannon are playing that they want him to concede, so it doesn’t look planned.
But from the rumors going around, this was all planned, in order to expose Soros and the Democratic Party fraudulent practices.
I pray these rumors are right.
Either way, a ridiculous amount of swamp creatures are not running for election again, McCain is rolling around in a boot which mysteriously switches to the other leg (he will be gone soon if not in jail), Clinton is wearing hers for a ridiculous long time for a simple toe fracture, over 4000 indictments are still sealed, Ryan is going bye bye, taxes are going down, the market hit highs every week, an estimated 6000+ people have been arrested in pedophile rings across the nation since Trump was elected....
And all in less than a year.
Sessions is a white hat. He is one of us. All in good time.
Moore wanted to have a duly elected Senator denied his seat simply because Moore didn't like his religion. That isn't liberty. Liberty is supposed to be for everybody- not just white Christians.
Was it perhaps because his religious conflicted with his oath of office to uphold the US Constitution?
That sounds very much like what JFK's detractors said -- "He won't uphold the Constitution; he'll take orders from the Vatican!"
Was it perhaps because his religious conflicted with his oath of office to uphold the US Constitution?
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Does the Bible tell people to take orders from the Vatican?
No, but thinking that all Muslims follow sharia law to the letter is about as accurate as thinking that all Christians follow the Bible to the letter.
I guess the question would be whether they actually wanted to implement Sharia Law, which is commanded by their religion.
If they're Shi'ite maybe they're commanded to do Sharia Law. But they aren't commanded to do it by the Koran. They weren't commanded to by Mohammed. Very, very roughly half the Muslims in the world don't see the need, and don't want to be ruled by it.
And you don't have anything like the knowledge or the right to say any different about them.
I guess the question would be whether they actually wanted to implement Sharia Law, which is commanded by their religion.
I'm not saying no Muslims can serve in government.. but... if they take an oath to uphold the Constitution and they simultaneously want to institute Sharia Law, as commanded by their religion, then that is breaking the oath of office. It doesn't matter if it is because of their religion or what the reason is.
So if they are actually Muslim, and follow the religion, which means they want to institute Sharia Law.. then it follows that they can't uphold their oath of office. That seems like, at minimum, a big "issue" to me. Or at least a valid concern.. Again, you're correct that identifying as Muslim doesn't mean they are actually Muslim. But if they are truly Muslim, they want to institute Sharia Law.
I'm no expert, but I see Ron Paul as a real Christian, yet I don't know of anything in that regard that would conflict with upholding the Constitution.