Ron polling above Thompson, yet Thompson's in?

[Gordon]

Sorry I don't have the link right now but someone posted a link the other day that catagorically showed via polls, both a major des moines newspaper one and a major new hampshire one where Ron was polling higher than Fred Thompson.

So Fox is full of shit. Someone should find those url links.

 

[DealzOnWheelz]

ur not really gordon ramsey!!!

are you??


I love Kitchen nightmares

 

[richk]

they're referring to national polling, not state specific polls.

 

[AceNZ]

they're referring to national polling, not state specific polls.

I thought the Fox requirements specified thresholds for either a national poll or a NH state poll. Iowa polls wouldn't count, though.

 

[Gordon]

I thought the Fox requirements specified thresholds for either a national poll or a NH state poll. Iowa polls wouldn't count, though.

That's what they had in their "Qualifying" list for that round table thing on thursday.

So they've lied once again.

 

[richk]

That's what they had in their "Qualifying" list for that round table thing on thursday.

So they've lied once again.

No, you are confusing the ABC debate (that uses 3 diff. criteria for inclusion) on the 5th with FOX's forum on the 6th.

Paul is invited to the ABC debate on the 5th.

Fox is claiming double digits in national polling, and the fact they have no room for more than 5 HAHA.

 

[Gordon]

No, you are confusing the ABC debate (that uses 3 diff. criteria for inclusion) on the 5th with FOX's forum on the 6th.

Paul is invited to the ABC debate on the 5th.

Fox is claiming double digits in national polling, and the fact they have no room for more than 5 .

Eh NO, please pay attention. I am using Fox's criteria. Abc's isn't the issue at all as Ron will be seen there.

 

[Hangly Man]

At least ABC won't be following FOX's "lead." So it's not like there will be a complete media blackout like there has been in previous years.

 

[richk]

Eh NO, please pay attention. I am using Fox's criteria. Abc's isn't the issue at all as Ron will be seen there.

OK, please provide the Link to Fox's criteria, then.

ABC has stated their criteria; FOX has mainly said double digit polling required and/or limited room on the bus.

Why are u so confused on this?
Either way they are simply making excuses to exclude Paul.
Does it really matter why?
Only a fool would believe their excuses!

 

[Gordon]

OK, please provide the Link to Fox's criteria, then.

>ABC has stated their criteria; FOX has mainly said double digit polling required and/or limited room on the bus.

Um NO, you put up your proof. Otherwise shut your yammering hole. I don't have time to babysit trolls who come to the defense of fox news at the drop of a hat. If you can put up your url link I will then put up mine. You can't do it, can you? Come on Ricky where's your proof? That's what I thought. For fairness, I'll put up mine after you put up yours. Only then.

>Why are u so confused on this?

I'm not confused at all. You're the one with the "Confused face/symbol"

>Does it really matter why?

Yes

>Only a fool would believe their excuses! :rolleyes


You're creating fake number criteria for them.

 

[Bryan]

Let's keep it civil everyone, OK?

Thanks!

 

[SQLz]

Its not about poll numbers, its who supports Fox's agenda. Simply talking about sound money is enough to make the owners of Fox have a collective conniption fit.

 

[richk]

OK, please provide the Link to Fox's criteria, then.

>ABC has stated their criteria; FOX has mainly said double digit polling required and/or limited room on the bus.

Um NO, you put up your proof. Otherwise shut your yammering hole. I don't have time to babysit trolls who come to the defense of fox news at the drop of a hat. If you can put up your url link I will then put up mine. You can't do it, can you? Come on Ricky where's your proof? That's what I thought. For fairness, I'll put up mine after you put up yours. Only then.

>Why are u so confused on this?

I'm not confused at all. You're the one with the "Confused face/symbol"

>Does it really matter why?

Yes

>Only a fool would believe their excuses! :rolleyes


You're creating fake number criteria for them.

This is my last post on this; they are going by NATIONAL polling percentages. Everyone invited to their forum on the 6th is in double digits(in NATIONAL Polls). The 2 candidates not invited are Paul and Hunter. Both Paul and Hunter are in single digits in all NATIONAL polls. That is the criteria that FOX is purported to be using. I do not know how to make it any clearer than that. If they used NH polling, that would be easily refuted, as Paul is polling ABOVE Thompson.

Sorry you are upset about this, if you were half as good at reading comprehension as you are at hurling insults, this thread would've died already. Good day to you.

 

[mconder]

ur not really gordon ramsey!!!
are you??

I love Kitchen nightmares

No doubt...Kitchen Nightmare is the best! If Ron Paul can withstand the scrutiny of Ramsey, then he really is a cut above the rest.

 

[xao]

Gordon 1

richk 0

Game over.

 

[Leslie Webb]

Let's hope that Ron does well in Iowa, around third, and then he could announce during the ABC debate that Fox has excluded him from the forum on the following day. He could add it in as an aside when commenting on foreign policy. He could say to a national TV audience what he said the other day in an interview. The war propagandists at Fox News are scared of him and that's why they excluded him.

Making the censorship an issue will help us. Third place in Iowa, top Republican fundraiser for the quarter, and support of his position by the NH GOP will all get us voters' sympathy and backfire on Fox. Let's just hope we can beat McCain's and Thompson's folks for third. Blow, Canada, blow!

 

[Kade]

Let's hope that Ron does well in Iowa, around third, and then he could announce during the ABC debate that Fox has excluded him from the forum on the following day. He could add it in as an aside when commenting on foreign policy. He could say to a national TV audience what he said the other day in an interview. The war propagandists at Fox News are scared of him and that's why they excluded him.

Making the censorship an issue will help us. Third place in Iowa, top Republican fundraiser for the quarter, and support of his position by the NH GOP will all get us voters' sympathy and backfire on Fox. Let's just hope we can beat McCain's and Thompson's folks for third. Blow, Canada, blow!

If Ron Paul gets third in Iowa, and Fox is caught with it's pants down like that, the other networks would become carrions feeding on the remains of Murdoch's Empire...

Seriously, I would love to see it.