Ron Paul...

[wgadget]

just got glitter bombed...

Anthony Terrell @AnthonyNBCNews Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
One man glitter bombs @RonPaul as he shakes hands after speech. Security shrugged it off, kept going instagr.am/p/Gr--BsTWAJ/

 

[MrGoose]

The one man in the race that's won't ban same sex marriage?

EDIT: Interesting 100th post...

 

[dannno]

I see the glitter packet but I see no RP

 

[cstarace]

The one man in the race that's won't ban same sex marriage?

EDIT: Interesting 100th post...

Meh, he did vote against same-sex adoption, though.

 

[GeorgiaAvenger]

Good for Ron. Don't cower to the glitter morons.

 

[BrittanySligar]

A gay man spent $3 Million supporting Ron this election.. Ron is clearly anti-gay. smh.

 

[MrGoose]

Meh, he did vote against same-sex adoption, though.

Interesting, thankfully I'm not a moron/single issue voter.

 

[Eric39]

Meh, he did vote against same-sex adoption, though.

Just against funding it. The price of being consistent is you sometimes stick to your values of small government and people think that means youre attacking groups when you vote no on federal funding.

 

[cstarace]

Just against funding it. The price of being consistent is you sometimes stick to your values of small government and people think that means youre attacking groups when you vote no on federal funding.

I actually didn't know this was the case... makes me feel better actually.

 

[RickyJ]

Same sex adoption is wrong. If you are going to allow that then you might as well allow a person to adopt a kid that is single.

 

[MrGoose]

Just against funding it. The price of being consistent is you sometimes stick to your values of small government and people think that means youre attacking groups when you vote no on federal funding.

Like RP more

 

[gerryb]

I actually didn't know this was the case... makes me feel better actually.

This is always the case... Whenever there is a Ron Paul vote that makes you think... "Well that isn't quite right...", come back to this.

 

[cstarace]

Same sex adoption is wrong. If you are going to allow that then you might as well allow a person to adopt a kid that is single.

Yes, because two loving gay parents are completely incapable of raising a child. Might as well let the kid feel completely unloved and unwanted in a foster home his whole life.

 

[Eric39]

Same sex adoption is wrong. If you are going to allow that then you might as well allow a person to adopt a kid that is single.

Are you serious?

 

[Okie RP fan]

Been wondering when this would happen... Those idiots, yes I will say idiots.

Anyone have a tube?

 

[VBRonPaulFan]

Same sex adoption is wrong. If you are going to allow that then you might as well allow a person to adopt a kid that is single.

that... doesn't even make any sense. there are probably almost as many stay-at-home dad's as there are stay-at-home mom's. who gives a damn what sex the parents are as long as they're both loving adults that care for the child?

 

[Austrian Econ Disciple]

Same sex adoption is wrong. If you are going to allow that then you might as well allow a person to adopt a kid that is single.

Let the market decide, not the State. Pretty much every study has said the same thing: love matters, genitalia don't.

 

[gerryb]

A gay man spent $3 Million supporting Ron this election.. Ron is clearly anti-gay. smh.

He's a 1%er, so your argument is invalid!

 

[affa]

Same sex adoption is wrong. If you are going to allow that then you might as well allow a person to adopt a kid that is single.

A loving couple can raise a child. Heck, a single mom or dad can raise a child, though two is better if only for time reasons... though one loving parent is better than two parents who ignore their child.

Gender has nothing to do with it.

 

[Nate-ForLiberty]

Same sex adoption is wrong. If you are going to allow that then you might as well allow a person to adopt a kid that is single.

[children singing!] "...because the Bible tells me so!"