Alright, two different takes. I do not believe that there is an assumed civil authority of our leaders to influence our religion. I am merely saying that they are human beings too, and entitled to have religious beliefs. As long as the Church of the United States is not created I am happy. Once the one world government takes over, if it does happen, will most likely establish a world religion, and that is what frightens me. With the up and coming NAU, I am worried about an official Church of North America, or other. I am in agreement with Ron Paul on this issue, that the second Amendment merely prevented the establishment of a Church of the United States. A church like this would be frightening.
I would like to say that I am in agreement over something like not allowing the ten commandments in courtrooms. It is foolish, because the ten commandments have nothing to do with a secular judicial system. America is too diverse to turn into a Nazi type religious fascism. The people won't allow it, however, I see your point that secretive influence over religion is a sneaky way to make religious fascism acceptable. The more government takes control, the more you can be sure that religious freedom will be decreased.
This is why I think issues like prayer in school should be left up to local governments. This promotes freedom, because if a parent does or does not want prayer in a school, then she or he can move to another district, or whatever. Respect the Second Amendment, don't allow a national church. Respect local and state rights, support the tenth amendment.
