Ron Paul tells the world "Goldman Sachs owns Romney and Obama"

[donnay]

Ron Paul tells the world "Goldman Sachs owns Romney and Obama"




Here is what Ron Paul said for those who cannot view video:

The people who run the Federal Reserve make sure their interests are protected. They have their two guys there, believe me! Why does Obama not attack Romney for being a Goldman Sachs candidate? It’s because they both are within the establishment! Neither one of them have the vaguest idea of what Austrian economics and sound money economics is all about. They play the game and they represent the one-party system.

Some people say why don’t we get a 3rd part? I say, why don’t we get a 2nd party!?! I’ve been in this business for a long time, and there is essentially NO DIFFERENCE FROM ONE ADMINISTRATION TO ANOTHER NO MATTER WHAT THE PLATFORM!!

 

[Travlyr]

Jim Rogers - "It doesn't matter Jackie whether it is Romney or Obama they are both the same. They don't have a clue what is going on. They caused the problems these are the guys that got us into this situation. Do you think they will get us out?"

Jackie Deangelis - "Alright two questions for you representative Paul. One, do you agree with what Mr. Rogers said? And two, are you ready to endorse Mitt Romney?

Ron Paul - "No to the second. Yes, I agree with Jimmy Rogers, he knows exactly what he is talking about. He emphasies the ignorance of the two when it comes to economic policy. That is something I would agree with. That isn't exactly the way I look at it. I look at it that there are people who are very very powerful that are able to make sure their interests are protected whether it's the people who run the federal reserve and bail out banks and bail out European banks and International situations.

Right now they have their two guys there. Believe me. Why does Obama not attack Romney for being the Goldman Sachs candidate? It's because they are both within the establishment where they need the federal reserve and the lender of last resort to make sure you can take all the risk in the world but don't sweat it because government will be there and the fed will be there and they are going to get bailed out.

So, I think the two guys are there, Jimmy can argue that they don't really understand economics, and in many ways that's true, because neither one of them have the vaguest idea what Austrian free market hard money economics is all about!

But, at the same time they know how to play the game and represent a one party system. Somebody said, "why don't we get a third party? And another one said, and I think correctly so, "why don't we get a second party? You know... compete with this single party.

I've been in this business a long time, and believe me, there is essentially no difference from one administration to another no matter what the platform says."

I believe you Ron.

 

[Anti Federalist]

Golden Sacks?

Quick edit ftw!

 

[Anti Federalist]

I've been in this business a long time, and believe me, there is essentially no difference from one administration to another no matter what the platform says."

I do too.

 

[MelissaWV]

Golden Sacks?

+rep

You keep using that punctuation. I do not think it means what you think it means.

 

[donnay]

Golden Sacks?

"Merry New Year!"

"That's "happy." In this country we say "Happy New Year."

"Thank you for correcting my English!"

 

[Lucille]

Awesome.

I read someone say in a comments section somewhere that they were just going to write in Goldman Sachs for POTUS. LOL...

 

[Anti Federalist]

"Merry New Year!"

"That's "happy." In this country we say "Happy New Year."

"Thank you for correcting my English!"

I am Nigel Ibeku, exchange student from Camaroon!

 

[Travlyr]

I am Nigel Ibeku, exchange student from Camaroon!

No you're not. You just made that up to impress a girl. I did my homework. There is no such guy as Nigel Ibeku. Unless he is undercover.

 

[presence]

No to the Second!

 

[bill1971]

From the Wall Street Journal. Looks like Goldman Sachs is moving away from Obama and towards Romney.

Employees at Goldman donated more than $1 million to Mr. Obama when he first ran for president. This election, they have given the president's campaign $136,000—less than Mr. Obama has collected from employees of the State Department. The employees have contributed nothing to the leading Democratic super PAC supporting his re-election.

By contrast, Goldman employees have given Mr. Romney's campaign $900,000, plus another $900,000 to the super PAC founded to help him.

 

[NIU Students for Liberty]

But Ron Paul has not confirmed that he's not endorsing Romney

 

[liberty2897]

From the Wall Street Journal. Looks like Goldman Sachs is moving away from Obama and towards Romney.

Employees at Goldman donated more than $1 million to Mr. Obama when he first ran for president. This election, they have given the president's campaign $136,000—less than Mr. Obama has collected from employees of the State Department. The employees have contributed nothing to the leading Democratic super PAC supporting his re-election.

By contrast, Goldman employees have given Mr. Romney's campaign $900,000, plus another $900,000 to the super PAC founded to help him.

I'm pretty sure they still prefer Obama with all the "civil rights" stuff, plus he has done a great job of bombing the shit out of the middle east (from their perspective). They win either way. They have to alternate between the R and D to keep the illusion of choice going for the masses. It is all about protecting Israel's interests (and power). Romney will almost certainly speed up the "bomb Iran" plan, so I'm sure he has that going for him (from their perspective).

Remember, the founder of Goldman Sachs is part of the "2 percent club" (at least in religious terms).

 

[2young2vote]

This was an article on The Blaze and the comments were almost sickening. There were many people accusing Ron of wanting to split the republican vote so Obama got elected again. Most just said "a vote for a third party is a vote for Obama." And of course there was the baseless name calling. The sad part is none of them were defending Romney. I bet they actually agreed but just can't get it through their heads that they aren't improving anything by voting for Romney. They just have an unbridled hate for Obama and Democrats.

 

[sailingaway]

This was an article on The Blaze and the comments were almost sickening. There were many people accusing Ron of wanting to split the republican vote so Obama got elected again. Most just said "a vote for a third party is a vote for Obama." And of course there was the baseless name calling. The sad part is none of them were defending Romney. I bet they actually agreed but just can't get it through their heads that they aren't improving anything by voting for Romney. They just have an unbridled hate for Obama and Democrats.

Yeah, I can post on there but if it is far down the comment page no one is going to read it, and frankly, I don't like wading in there.

 

[bill1971]

This was an article on The Blaze and the comments were almost sickening. There were many people accusing Ron of wanting to split the republican vote so Obama got elected again. Most just said "a vote for a third party is a vote for Obama." And of course there was the baseless name calling. The sad part is none of them were defending Romney. I bet they actually agreed but just can't get it through their heads that they aren't improving anything by voting for Romney. They just have an unbridled hate for Obama and Democrats.

Yep, keeping the 2 party system alive. It's sad.

 

[NIU Students for Liberty]

This was an article on The Blaze and the comments were almost sickening. There were many people accusing Ron of wanting to split the republican vote so Obama got elected again. Most just said "a vote for a third party is a vote for Obama." And of course there was the baseless name calling. The sad part is none of them were defending Romney. I bet they actually agreed but just can't get it through their heads that they aren't improving anything by voting for Romney. They just have an unbridled hate for Obama and Democrats.

The same type of comments show up on Napolitano's Facebook page. Funny because they act as if Napolitano suddenly betrayed the Fox News viewers.

 

[AGRP]

Michael Weiner's best work. I wish I could find the audio:

"I pledge allegiance to the Stock of Goldman Sachs of Wall Street and to the Gang for which it stands One Gang indivisible with liberty and profits for them."

 

[Keith and stuff]

Some folks in New Hampshire are promoting a similar idea.

Goldman Sachs 2012 campaign kick-off
Today 4:00pm until 6:00pm
Support the true winner this presidential election -- vote Goldman Sachs.

Help promote our campaign to remind voters that, whether they support the blue or the red team, their vote is already cast for Goldman Sachs. T-shirts and posters, hand-screenprinted with care at the workspace, will be available for purchase, and we'll be giving away stickers.
https://www.facebook.com/events/231057703689700/232862323509238/

 

[Travlyr]

Some folks in New Hampshire are promoting a similar idea.

Goldman Sachs 2012 campaign kick-off
Today 4:00pm until 6:00pm
Support the true winner this presidential election -- vote Goldman Sachs.

Help promote our campaign to remind voters that, whether they support the blue or the red team, their vote is already cast for Goldman Sachs. T-shirts and posters, hand-screenprinted with care at the workspace, will be available for purchase, and we'll be giving away stickers.
https://www.facebook.com/events/231057703689700/232862323509238/

I don't do farcebook... is there somewhere else I can buy a T-shirt with that Goldman Sachs message?