My letter to CNN
I saw this thread a little too late, but I sent the following to CNN via their contact about TV link on the bottom of the page. Feel free to forward it if you want:
-------------------
One of your post debate commentators essentially called Ron Paul crazy for mentioning the highway connecting Mexico, US, Canada stating that it wasn't a reality. He said:
"if you want to be taken seriously as a candidate you can't be like ron paul, who is national TV still talking about these things like secretive superhighways that are a figment of his imagination."
This is incorrect, and apparently this individual does not know how to inform himself before presenting his uneducated opinion. The lack of integrity is disgusting.
You only have to go as far as the North America's SuperCorridor Coalition's web site at:
http://www.nascocorridor.com/ to learn about the project which has been called the "NAFTA Supoer Corridor," the "NAFTA Super Highway," the "NASCO Trade Corridor," and the "Ports-to-Plains Trade Corridor."
But why stop there. Some US States have setup web sites talking about it as well:
Texas Department of Transportation:
http://www.keeptexasmoving.com/
Colorado Department of Transportation:
http://www.portstoplainscorridor.com/
And let's not forget:
http://www.portstoplains.com
All of which essentially state:
"The Ports-to-Plains Trade Corridor is a planned, multimodal transportation corridor including a multi-lane divided highway that will facilitate the efficient transportation of goods and services from Mexico, through West Texas, New Mexico, Colorado, and Oklahoma, and ultimately on into Canada and the Pacific Northwest."
Some simple Google searches yield numerous articles and commentaries discussing the topic and the legislation related to it. You would hope that I wouldn't have to waste my time pointing these out to a news network like CNN.
The commentator needs to be held accountable for presenting uneducated opinion as fact. First and foremost, a formal apology should be issued to Ron Paul and his campaign. Secondly a "LOUD" retraction should be issued and broadcast numerous times in an attempt to undo some of unfair and un-American damage that your broadcast station has inflicted on the Ron Paul campaign.