Superbowl ads need to be creative or funny to get really noticed. I don't see our current ad people (from the official campaign) pulling something like that off. No offense to them.
Superbowl ads need to be creative or funny to get really noticed. I don't see our current ad people (from the official campaign) pulling something like that off. No offense to them.
We dont have to spend $2M for a 30 second ad. We just have to have THE BLIMP in the sky over sundevil stadium. ....
Pointless post whether it's funny or not, professionally produced or not, $2 million or not.. because...
wait for it..
POLITICAL ADS AREN'T ALLOWED IN THE SUPERBOWL
Thanks.
On what grounds would they not be allowed?
We dont have to spend $2M for a 30 second ad. We just have to have THE BLIMP in the sky over sundevil stadium. ....
Political adds are acceptable in the Superbowl.
The cost of just running the add this year will be 2.6Million or maybe a bit higher.
If the campaign is not planning on something like this the grassroots should. If we get 100k donors on the 16th we should go for it.
Everyone agrees...Superbowl commercials have to be funny, or appeal to emotion to be remembered(e.g. Budweiser commercial with the troops at the airport). I think a funny commerical would be:
A scene with a Rudy look-a-like sleeping in his bed. He is mumbling, tossing and turning. Softly and slowly, an audible chant grows louder and louder as visions of his "nightmare" pop on the screen. Real video of thousands of people chanting "RON PAUL, RON PAUL." As it chanting reaches peak volume, Rudy awakens in a cold sweat and screams "AAHHHHH" as an image of Thomas Jefferson appears in front him with the Constitution held out. Jefferson then rolls it up and smacks him with it. Rudy awakens again in a cold sweat. Then the words appear on the screen, "A nightmare for crooked politicians" then "A Revolution for Americans" ... "Ron Paul 2008"
Maybe something along those lines![]()