Ron Paul on Hannity (12/15/11) Post Debate Interview - Official Thread

Ron has blown Hannity off on every post fox debate show this year I believe. He should do it again. If he goes on he needs to crucify Sean. He needs to start with Hannity calling him an "idiot" in 2008 and than explain exactly why he's a statist.

America deserves to know what a statist is. It explains a LOT about most of the candidates.
 
America deserves to know what a statist is. It explains a LOT about most of the candidates.

Where the hell is that video of the interviewer, not Paul, using that word Statist, and Paul not denying it, because I think that's the interview Hannity uses to accuse Paul of calling him a Statist. Or maybe I'm wrong and it doesn't exist?
 
I actually think it's more prudent to thank Hannity for questioning him about the newsletters. "Hannity, you are actually doing a job that the rest of the media isn't doing. They're all caught up in polls and who's winning the horse race, but you're one of the only ones actually digging into the past of the candidates. Thank you! This is what journalists are supposed to do!" Then he can go on to explain.

First, it makes it seem like the newsletters are no big deal. Second, it makes Hannity feel good about himself and have a more favorable opinion of Paul.

I know you want red meat, but this is the wiser path.



Trust This

Probably the best approach.
 
Ron NEEDS to come out tonight with TOTAL CONFIDENCE and smack down the newsletter BS. He's gotta do it right or it's going to stick around.

RP needs to get pumped up and mad like when he gets challenged by these dimwits in the debate, NO SCREWING AROUND, NO PADDY CAKE LAME COMPLEX ANSWERS!

This is going to be the attack Ron Paul debate, pray God lights a fire in Ron Paul's belly so he can demolish their attacks with passionate precision!
 
OK, I've been browsing the conservative sites(Ace, hotair, etc) and they are pushing the newsletter story hard. It's incredible how hard they are pushing it, actually. Shit needs to be addressed with Hannity tonight.
 
It was addressed last campaign. Does it really need to be addressed - it would give it legitimacy.
 
I wouldn't have said this a few weeks ago, but I wish Ron would blow Hannity off. Yes, he reaches a large number of conservative voters that we need, but obviously we haven't needed his help. There is NO WAY Ron's success so far has been because of Hannity.
 
OK, I've been browsing the conservative sites(Ace, hotair, etc) and they are pushing the newsletter story hard. It's incredible how hard they are pushing it, actually. Shit needs to be addressed with Hannity tonight.
Very Well Planned... Like they say, Nothing happens as a surprise in Politics and that also goes for political news.

Yeah, they crafted this very well HIT CAMPAIGN in the 11th hour of Iowa.

Cavuto will be neutral, but we have seen the other 3 are given orders to attack like Pit Bulls,

Bret Beair *signed* at Ron Paul @ the last debate he moderated and Jon Stewart covered Beair's ridiculous animations during the debate.
Carl Cameron... do we even need to discuss this fascist-neocon statist?
Megan Kelly already tried to attack Ron Paul as "MEAN" "BRUTAL" in her HIT INTERVIEW this afternoon. Only took her 95 seconds to bring Israel into the entrapped interview.

Neil Cavuto just stated, "We've got a couple of people leading the polls right now, Ron Paul and Newt Gingrich, so it might be the 'Mutual Pyle-On by some of the Other Candidates' "
 
Very Well Planned... Like they say, Nothing happens as a surprise in Politics and that also goes for political news.

Yeah, they crafted this very well HIT CAMPAIGN in the 11th hour of Iowa.

Cavuto will be neutral, but we have seen the other 3 are given orders to attack like Pit Bulls,

Bret Beair *signed* at Ron Paul @ the last debate he moderated and Jon Stewart covered Beair's ridiculous animations during the debate.
Carl Cameron... do we even need to discuss this fascist-neocon statist?
Megan Kelly already tried to attack Ron Paul as "MEAN" "BRUTAL" in her HIT INTERVIEW this afternoon. Only took her 95 seconds to bring Israel into the entrapped interview.

Neil Cavuto just stated, "We've got a couple of people leading the polls right now, Ron Paul and Newt Gingrich, so it might be the 'Mutual Pyle-On by some of the Other Candidates' "


he also asked something along the lines of "you know there's a possibilty they will attack you tonight?" an ominous reference to candidates (or mods) attacking him tonight.
 
I actually think it's more prudent to thank Hannity for questioning him about the newsletters. "Hannity, you are actually doing a job that the rest of the media isn't doing. They're all caught up in polls and who's winning the horse race, but you're one of the only ones actually digging into the past of the candidates. Thank you! This is what journalists are supposed to do!" Then he can go on to explain.

First, it makes it seem like the newsletters are no big deal. Second, it makes Hannity feel good about himself and have a more favorable opinion of Paul.

I know you want red meat, but this is the wiser path.



Trust This
After actually listening to a piece of Hannity's show today, I am once again endorsing this type of response! It will be huge! Remember to use your opponent's strength against him. Hannity wants to throw bombs at Paul? Paul thanks him and says it's about time someone in the media is examining the candidates record. It would confuse and neuter Hannity's attack!
 
The whole premise of this attack is stupid. Ultra-right talking heads who spew hate for a living calling Ron a racist to an ultra-right audience that doesn't really care about racism.

I'll worry about this when there are MSM stories.
 
Back
Top