Ron Paul need to ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK!! 2nite

M

mikeycapz

Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2008
Messages
104
He needs to put Mclame to shame by attacking his straight talk and then give the real straight talk. Romney, I dont even know where to start there are so many things to attack this nut on. But I do think it should be the economy he attacks Mitt on. And Huckabee I bet takes Ron's side as they both go on the Mclame Romney attack. Anyone agree????
 
Rally the army, and charge. This is where we need to make our stand. Liberty, now and forever.
 
Well, I agree this is probably the last opportunity to do a big stand-out performance before Super Tuesday. Rather than 'angry attacking' Ron I'd like to see the 'condescending and belittling' Ron. If he attacks it will just look like a desperate move. But I'd like to see him call other politicians ideas "moronic" or "foolish" or "wow - you're pandering to the 3rd graders again..." or something like that. When you have the right philosophy you don't have to get angry all the time. There's nothing they can say that can knock him off course. They are pandering, he has positions. I say denigrate them..
 
Ron is Ron - he's going to be what he's always been in these debates. The more airtime they give him, the better he looks. If he goes all unhinged like you want him to, he'll come off looking like Alan Keyes. Politics is won in responses, not in questions. As long as he has the strongest responses against the other candidates, he'll be on top.

But there's going to be no "dramatic change" tonight. You n00bs are so caught up in your fantasies of silver-bullet stunt moments that you lose sight of the forest for the trees. Ron isn't going to change, HQ isn't going to change, and there ain't no billionaire.

Tactics don't win the White House - strategy does. Remember that.

Go canvas.
 
Last edited:
stewie3128 said:
Ron is Ron - he's going to be what he's always been in these debates. The more airtime they give him, the better he looks. If he goes all unhinged like you want him to, he'll come off looking like Alan Keyes. Politics is won in responses, not in questions. As long as he has the strongest responses against the other candidates, he'll be on top.

But there's going to be no "dramatic change" tonight. You n00bs are so caught up in your fantasies of silver-bullet stunt moments that you lose sight of the forest for the trees. Ron isn't going to change, HQ isn't going to change, and there ain't no billionaire.

Tactics don't win the White House - strategy does. Remember that.

Go canvas.
Click to expand...

I'm talking about the Paul that answered the Electability question. We need that Ron Paul the entire debate!!
 
To people who do not know Ron Paul it will not go over well if he behaves less than presidential. So calm down. His attacks must be more subtle--not screaming attacks. :)

Frankly I find attacks make it appear one is on the defensive and not confident.
 
Im not talking about scream and go crazy attacks. Im talking about going after Mclame & Romney on their stupid ass policy's and then talk about his own policy's and get his point across. I want Ron to make them all look stupid and make them have a speechless response
 
If he goes all unhinged like you want him to, he'll come off looking like Alan Keyes
Click to expand...

Nobody is advocating being unhinged. Hell, that's McCains forte.

We are talking about things such as bringing up the fact that McCain was reported by sources such as NEWSWEEK, to have called Chuck Grassley an Asshole, and told John Cornyn, to go fuck himself, when throwing temper tantrums.

We need Paul to ask McCAin if he is willing to undergo the same instant background check previous to commanding the military arsenal of the U.S., since McCain voted to make every other veteran in America undergo a backgound check before purchasing a firearm to be sure they did not suffer any "post trauatic stress disorder" and thus be named "mentally defective".

After all, McCain voted for that bill in the Senate. It passed, and now vets are having their concealed carry permits denied, due to even mild cases of PTS disorder treatment from the Korean war, and Viet Nam, and Desert Storm "Democracy Building" efforts.

Don't confuse rationality, with "being unhinged".
 
I appreciate people's faith that Ron Paul - after having achieved 4% during Super Tuesday - will spontaneously levitate and convince the delegates to switch their votes prior to the convention.

Sorry, this is the moment - without an explosive performance (of some sort) tonight he will be fully ignored for the next 5 days and pass into history. We will be stuck with war, deficits, taxes, and onerous laws for the next four years - and no one with the credibility of Dr Paul to lead us in 2012. And when countries go to heck (almost certain in that time) like the Russians - they vote in nice strongmen like Putin.

We've seen detailed economic questions, wonderful answers to stupid questions like "electability... do you have any?", well-thought consistent responses - and it hasn't amounted to anything. The point of an election is to get elected. Ron needs to make the move tonight - even if it is a desperate one. If he is just going to politely stand there tonight - I'd prefer he quit tomorrow and go write some more books.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Charlie Kirk Asked If Israeli Government Gave “Stand-Down” Order Allowing 10/7 Attack Before He Was Hit
Replies
6
Views
73
acptulsa
acptulsa
J
The End Fruit of the Israeli Attack on America on 9/11 is Here, Gen. Wes Clark, "...And Finishing off, Iran." Well Played, Khazars
Replies
4
Views
101
James_Madison_Lives
J
J
With Netanyahu-Funded Hamas and ‘Inside Job’ October 7 as a Pretext, No Reason to Expect Anything But Genocide in Gaza Invasion
Replies
1
Views
98
unknown
unknown
PAF
Senior Israeli Lawmaker Suggests Nuclear Attack on Iran
Replies
7
Views
926
unknown
unknown
J
Netanyahu Talks Tough Against Hamas While Media Fails to Report That He Funded Them
Replies
1
Views
36
unknown
unknown
Back
Top