justinpagewood
Member
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2011
- Messages
- 395
![]()
Ehh ehh?
Lol! First person to notice! haha, jk.
![]()
Ehh ehh?
Oh ya, and it needs a Donate button.
You are misrepresenting it. I am drawn to the branding on a shirt, I am repulsed by branding on a candidate. Really, really repulsed.
I'm with you. I think its phony. BUT at the same time, I think good design isn't phony. It serves a purpose, not to fluff or 'sell', but to present. To a degree we are selling, and no one, who's new to the idea of liberty, is going to 'buy' into something they can't grasp. I think its different on a national level vs local races. But if the design focus on presenting, and not selling, then I would be for that.
Justin, I like that webpage. This is the radical shift I'm talking about when it comes to campaigning. But on the other side, people support a candidate because they are 'inspired' to. I"m not saying flag it up, but something more positive that appeals on an emotional level. It's very much an emotional thing... this is a time when people don't want 'govt' and I think black and white screams it, via IRS tax forms.
I think the campaign needs to have good design and a consistent brand, but along an anti-campaign, anti-political, atypical concept.
Maybe just color wash in back, red to blue or something? I mean, I don't know design, but color might do it.
I'll go further.... Ron Paul is the 'President of the Internet' and I think he should have a killer web page.
How about Purple (mixing the blue and red of both sides) or Green (for grassroots)?
I too think he should have a bad ass website, and it should tell campaigns and politics to screw off with design that is completely against the grain and spectrum that is anything to do whatsoever with typical elections as we know it.
Look at the background to Rand's campaign site. I liked it. Not that exact picture, but the idea of a picture background. http://www.randpaul2010.com/
but a simple color might work too.... I do like it to be different.
Look at the background to Rand's campaign site. I liked it. Not that exact picture, but the idea of a picture background. http://www.randpaul2010.com/
but a simple color might work too.... I do like it to be different.
Original poster: I may be wrong, but it looks like you may have used a bitmap in your design. The campaign shouldn't adopt a design that isn't a vector, as they will need a highly scalable logo. You should vectorize it if it isn't already 100% vector.
I'm with you. I think its phony. BUT at the same time, I think good design isn't phony. It serves a purpose, not to fluff or 'sell', but to present. To a degree we are selling, and no one, who's new to the idea of liberty, is going to 'buy' into something they can't grasp. I think its different on a national level vs local races. But if the design focus on presenting, and not selling, then I would be for that.
Justin, I like that webpage. This is the radical shift I'm talking about when it comes to campaigning. But on the other side, people support a candidate because they are 'inspired' to. I"m not saying flag it up, but something more positive that appeals on an emotional level. It's very much an emotional thing... this is a time when people don't want 'govt' and I think black and white screams it, via IRS tax forms.
I think the campaign needs to have good design and a consistent brand, but along an anti-campaign, anti-political, atypical concept.
I think it looks pretty good with inverted colors (black background) too
![]()
I think it looks pretty good with inverted colors (black background) too
![]()
There's something to be said about minimalism.. look at craigslist.
But even minimal design despends on good design. Again, we are courting a general voting populace. That needs to be kept in mind.... way, way in back, but kept in mind none the less.
That looks very cool, but very bird of prey-ish. Not sure if that is the connotation you want. Now if it were for a shadow campaign, fine. Although..... I really like it -- for a pin or bumper sticker. I like the black/gray the other way better for a shirt..
I'm sorry, did you mean the WEBSITE? that might be cool....