Ron Paul: Christine O'Donnell Can Win - We Live In Revolutionary Times!
YouTube - Ron Paul: O'Donnell Can Win - We Live In Revolutionary Times!
YouTube - Ron Paul: O'Donnell Can Win - We Live In Revolutionary Times!
Last edited:
Ron Paul: Christine O'Donnell Can Win - We Live In Revolutionary Times!
- Thread starter FrankRep
- Start date
teamrican1
Banned
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2007
- Messages
- 344
One of his best interviews ever. Very few stumbles and he looks poised and sharp. Did he just get a haircut or perhaps lost some weight?
I don't think I have seen him this positive over the direction of the country and his support.
PatriotOne
Member
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2007
- Messages
- 10,722
He does look good. Nice suit, haircut and a summer tan I think.
PatriotOne
Member
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2007
- Messages
- 10,722
Wow. That was a great interview by Anderson Cooper on Liberal media. He actually let him talk and didn't interupt or argue or anything! I don't think I have ever seen that happen before.
silentshout
Member
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2010
- Messages
- 884
I guess she could, but is that a good thing? What would she do differently? When I looked at her site, it had been scrubbed and was just a splash page, but I haven't been back. However, from what I have read, she doesn't seem like some champion of liberty to me..not even close. (and I am not talking about the anti-masturbation stuff and other personal views)
Anyway, I liked the rest of the clip
Anyway, I liked the rest of the clip
Last edited:
Cynanthrope
Member
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2009
- Messages
- 94
As much as I support and Ron Paul, I have to strongly disagree that O'Donnell has a chance of winning considering what she's already said and that she's a Christian moralist campaigning in a deeply liberal state.
With that aside, it's a great interview.
With that aside, it's a great interview.
Stary Hickory
Member
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2009
- Messages
- 3,917
Yep that was a good interview for Ron Paul. I can send that one out through the normal channels.
Stary Hickory
Member
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2009
- Messages
- 3,917
We will see, I would like to think her religious beliefs would not be something that people would vote against.
If she does win in Delaware then I have a whole new kind of optimism for the future. Her win in the primamary was borderline revolt or revolution. I like how things are getting mixed up.
If we could divert this energy towards states rights,nullification, or secession(mass nullification) that would be great. If one state would draw first blood the facade would crumble and hopefully the power holdover us would break away or weaken.
Just looking to find liberty and freedom in my lifetime here.
BlackTerrel
Member
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2008
- Messages
- 10,464
Thanks for posting Frank. Good video.
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2007
- Messages
- 63,472
Is she campaigning as a Christian moralist? Or is that from 20 years ago?
Does anyone have any recent speeches from O'Donnell where she goes into any of that stuff?
sofia
Banned
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2009
- Messages
- 3,485
what's so bad about being a "Christian Moralist"????...Morality is the underpinning of liberty.
do u prefer atheistic immoralists like Obama?
nate895
Member
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2007
- Messages
- 12,091
Who cares if she does, unless she specifically says that it is a Federal issue. The Johnson supporters on this board try to convince me to vote for him on the grounds that he believes that abortion is a state-issue, even though he is pro-choice himself. This is my opportunity to turn it around on them: Unless O'Donnell believes it is a Federal issue, then it does not really matter, does it?
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2007
- Messages
- 63,472
It isn't an issue we are in total agreement on. If we don't agree 90% on an issue, we really shouldn't focus on it. At least that's my opinion. 50/50 issues are divisive.
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2007
- Messages
- 63,472
Agreed. I don't care.
But I am growing tired of people using these as litmus tests (one way or another) to put down certain "Tea Party" candidates (for lack of a better description).
nobody's_hero
Member
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2008
- Messages
- 10,908
Best definition of what compromise should look like, that I have ever heard.
I swear if I hear one more neocon say that we have to learn to compromise and it results in slipping away towards tyranny, instead of a compromise toward freedom, I'm going to 'compromise' my sanity.
People think we should be bipartisan just for the sake of good sportsmanship, then accuse Ron Paul et. al. of being fringe wing-nuts because we won't even start down the slippery slope.
I swear if I hear one more neocon say that we have to learn to compromise and it results in slipping away towards tyranny, instead of a compromise toward freedom, I'm going to 'compromise' my sanity.
People think we should be bipartisan just for the sake of good sportsmanship, then accuse Ron Paul et. al. of being fringe wing-nuts because we won't even start down the slippery slope.
Last edited:
Similar threads
