Ron Paul Channel Monthly Fee...

[torchbearer]

The thing about Ron Paul, which I love him for, is that I already know pretty much his exact position on all the issues. I don't see something in the news and think "I wonder what Ron Paul thinks about this" because I already know he would take the consistent principled approach. So for me this show is kind of redundant in that regard, even if it were free.

I got to see a conversation between Ron Paul and Glenn Greenwald.
I know ron's position, but how does Glenn respond to Ron's position?

 

[GregSarnowski]

I got to see a conversation between Ron Paul and Glenn Greenwald.
I know ron's position, but how does Glenn respond to Ron's position?

I haven't seen the interview but let me take a wild guess -- they agreed with each other? j/k...

I just think if we want our message to permeate the culture we have to take it to the mainstream, not expect it to come to us. In that regard I think the Reason/CATO/Koch faction does a much better job than the LRC/Mises/Paul one, even if they do sometimes temper their positions more than I think is necessary.

 

[torchbearer]

I haven't seen the interview but let me take a wild guess -- they agreed with each other? j/k...

I just think if we want our message to permeate the culture we have to take it to the mainstream, not expect it to come to us. In that regard I think the Reason/CATO/Koch faction does a much better job than the LRC/Mises/Paul one, even if they do sometimes temper their positions more than I think is necessary.

they didn't agree, and weren't the same.
Glenn does not believe him and Ron are the same. Glenn thinks its perfectly moral to rob from you to give to another person. and he stated such about their differences in economics and 'social justice'. Glenn almost seemed pissed that Ron inferred Edward was a libertarian because he donated to him.

 

[evilfunnystuff]

I got to see a conversation between Ron Paul and Glenn Greenwald.
I know ron's position, but how does Glenn respond to Ron's position?

Too bad no newly disillusioned Democrats, will get to see that discussion locked behind the paywall.

Matt Damon and Obama recently broke up, one of the issues was the NSA scandle if I remember correctly. Shouldn't this interview be out there prominently, waiting for him to stumble upon it.

 

[torchbearer]

Too bad no newly disillusioned Democrats, will get to see that discussion locked behind the paywall.

Matt Damon and Obama recently broke up, one of the issues was the NSA scandle if I remember correctly. Shouldn't this interview be out there prominently, waiting for him to stumble upon it.

what pay wall?
the videos are being posted for free on youtube by the people who are squatting on ronpaul's web address.
everyone should just drop their subscription, and stop subsidizing people who won't contribute.
then no more videos.

 

[QueenB4Liberty]

It's $10 a month people. lol I agree it's not such a good idea if you want to gain non-supporters, but if you love Ron Paul, you should support him.

 

[torchbearer]

judge napolitano on 2nd episode to discuss the strike down of the ny law of stop and frisk.

 

[TaftFan]

Somebody on youtube is uploading them (not me).

 

[torchbearer]

in this episode, ron paul actually states that local police departments are getting out of control.
AF special guest next episode.

 

[angelatc]

It's $10 a month people. lol I agree it's not such a good idea if you want to gain non-supporters, but if you love Ron Paul, you should support him.

He is a millionaire. I can't even afford to get my car fixed.

I don't feel entitled to his content for free, but not subscribing doesn't mean I don't love him.

 

[QueenB4Liberty]

He is a millionaire. I can't even afford to get my car fixed.

We don't know what the money goes to, maybe it goes to Campaign for Liberty or something like that. Better him than Obama. I guess a lot of Ron Paul "fans" finally show their true colors. It's $10, it's so insignificant. And it's funny how people bitch about freeloading all the time and then expect to get this for free.

 

[angelatc]

We don't know what the money goes to, maybe it goes to Campaign for Liberty or something like that. Better him than Obama. I guess a lot of Ron Paul "fans" finally show their true colors. It's $10, it's so insignificant. And it's funny how people bitch about freeloading all the time and then expect to get this for free.

Who the fuck are you to decide that $10 isn't significant, exactly? Since it isn't significant, buy me a subscription.

I don't feel entitled to the content. But just because I am not subscribing does not mean I do not love him. It just means I don't see value in it.

But the rest of what you're saying - I agree with. It's the liberal side of the movement - they want someone else (advertisers) to pay for their stuff. (Content).

 

[ClydeCoulter]

We don't know what the money goes to, maybe it goes to Campaign for Liberty or something like that. Better him than Obama. I guess a lot of Ron Paul "fans" finally show their true colors. It's $10, it's so insignificant. And it's funny how people bitch about freeloading all the time and then expect to get this for free.

I can't direct the unholy people there to get their sins washed away, because the sinners will not pay to get preached to.

in other obfuscated words

 

[fr33]

We don't know what the money goes to, maybe it goes to Campaign for Liberty or something like that. Better him than Obama. I guess a lot of Ron Paul "fans" finally show their true colors. It's $10, it's so insignificant. And it's funny how people bitch about freeloading all the time and then expect to get this for free.

You act like I'm obligated to buy this subscription just because I'm a Ron Paul supporter. It's strange. What's next? Will I have to purchase and wear an arm-band everywhere I go?

 

[torchbearer]

wow, great conversation with the judge. deep.

 

[green73]

Who the fuck are you to decide that $10 isn't significant, exactly? Since it isn't significant, buy me a subscription.

I don't feel entitled to the content. But just because I am not subscribing does not mean I do not love him. It just means I don't see value in it.

But the rest of what you're saying - I agree with. It's the liberal side of the movement - they want someone else (advertisers) to pay for their stuff. (Content).

Of course you don’t see value in it. That right there, personifies you. xx

 

[QueenB4Liberty]

You act like I'm obligated to buy this subscription just because I'm a Ron Paul supporter. It's strange. What's next? Will I have to purchase and wear an arm-band everywhere I go?

no one said you have to buy it. You don't want to pay for it? Your loss. Just don't watch the youtube for free and then get pissed when someone calls you a free loader.

 

[angelatc]

Of course you don’t see value in it. That right there, personifies you. xx

How so?

 

[QueenB4Liberty]

Who the fuck are you to decide that $10 isn't significant, exactly? Since it isn't significant, buy me a subscription.

I don't feel entitled to the content. But just because I am not subscribing does not mean I do not love him. It just means I don't see value in it.

But the rest of what you're saying - I agree with. It's the liberal side of the movement - they want someone else (advertisers) to pay for their stuff. (Content).

You sound like a liberal when you say "buy me a subscription." lol As long as you don't think you can watch the youtube for free.

 

[angelatc]

You act like I'm obligated to buy this subscription just because I'm a Ron Paul supporter. It's strange. What's next? Will I have to purchase and wear an arm-band everywhere I go?

I think this is where we separate the cultists from the realists.