Ron Paul CAN still win the nomination.

[Ivash]

It would be nothing more than further proof that he doesnt exist because WE were the ones that got off of our collective asses and did something about our own problems instead of placing an expectation on the great noodly sky appendage to just solve our problems for us.

Actually at this point the odds are so astronomically against Dr. Paul that his victory really would be pretty good proof that God exists.

That little caveat aside, if people want to put their faith in God, why do you feel the need to bash them? This is a libertarian website, and personal faith is a personal matter. Shouldn't that just be respected? Particularly because many here have had difficult times enough recently without someone who is supposed to be an ally attack them.

 

[SilenceDewgooder]

Got math anyone?

got someone who can get 15%?

 

[SilenceDewgooder]

Unfortunately I have yet to come across a Christian denomination that spells out happy ending without the world ending first, hell, isn't Israel supposed to be destroyed and then rebuilt?

Solomon's Temple has to be rebuilt for a 3rd time..

 

[sailingaway]

Actually at this point the odds are so astronomically against Dr. Paul that his victory really would be pretty good proof that God exists.

That little caveat aside, if people want to put their faith in God, why do you feel the need to bash them? This is a libertarian website, and personal faith is a personal matter. Shouldn't that just be respected? Particularly because many here have had difficult times enough recently without someone who is supposed to be an ally attack them.

^^this. Don't attack other people's faith just because you don't share it.

 

[sailingaway]

If we had given up months ago, we would've have had the opportunity for the Romney to show what a big cheater he is. Some recognize that Romney is slightly better than Obama on policy. But they might not have known that Romney was a giant Fking Ahole. Now they know that Romney is a Giant Fking Ahole and that is going to cost Romney a whole lot more votes than if he just said "whatever" about the Paul delegates. If we didn't fight, people wouldn't know that Romney is a GFA, now they know he is.

LOL!

I don't always agree with you, but + rep for that!

 

[LibertyEagle]

So I see why you're no longer a moderator with posts like this. You're instigating people with your passive aggressive posts.

What it means I have been around here for a long time and know what has been posted.

Apparently, it hit too close to home.

 

[mac_hine]

What it means I have been around here for a long time and know what has been posted.

Apparently, it hit too close to home.

Nope, you're just really friggin annoying. I don't post here all that much. Out of all the people here who irritate me, you take the cake. You ruin threads with your passive aggressive remarks.... Whenever I see your avatar, I immediately get irritated. There is something about you i just don't trust.

 

[jeremiahj13]

This thread was created to say that Paul still has a chance at the nomination, just a very small one at that. I do believe in God, but believe everyone is entitled to their own opinions. God bless you all (if you don't believe in God, then I will simply wish you good luck with your lives for the next 4 years)

Hopefully things work out better in 2016 for us.... but from the poll(s) I've seen, Rand doesn't stand much of a chance either.

 

[GeorgiaAvenger]

No, Ron Paul is not getting the nomination. Good heavens.

edit-nm, i see the thread is a mockery

 

[LibertyEagle]

Nope, you're just really friggin annoying. I don't post here all that much. Out of all the people here who irritate me, you take the cake. You ruin threads with your passive aggressive remarks.... Whenever I see your avatar, I immediately get irritated. There is something about you i just don't trust.

You know, most people who didn't see themselves in the remark, would have laughed at it.

 

[runamuck]

Get over it already. It's over

 

[1stAmendguy]

What it means I have been around here for a long time and know what has been posted.

Apparently, it hit too close to home.

To put it quite frankly you were trolling. Sure, a few other people made snide remarks but there's was a genuine reaction to thread. The purpose of your post on the other hand was to try and canvass people who share your worldview to visit a more obscure place on the forum that they otherwise wouldn't know or care about to incite debate and judging by the way you put together your words ( the poorly prepared off the cuff kind). I'm guessing you're a female because of the sense of entitlement that comes off to me in your posts feeling you need to control discourse on every topic debated on in this forum. When it's all men who are discussing matters a female will barge in and demand the discourse change to make her feel comfortable. That's primarily female behavior. She uses the passive aggressive tone in her manipulating efforts.

 

[LibertyEagle]

To put it quite frankly you were trolling. Sure, a few other people made snide remarks but there's was a genuine reaction to thread. The purpose of your post on the other hand was to try and canvass people who share your worldview to visit a more obscure place on the forum that they otherwise wouldn't know or care about to incite debate and judging by the way you put together your words ( the poorly prepared off the cuff kind). I'm guessing you're a female because of the sense of entitlement that comes off to me in your posts feeling you need to control discourse on every topic debated on in this forum. When it's all men who are discussing matters a female will barge in and demand the discourse change to make her feel comfortable. That's primarily female behavior. She uses the passive aggressive tone in her manipulating efforts.

It was a joke. Perhaps you didn't get it, because you have not been around here long enough. But, those who were here in the first campaign know why the Religion subforum was setup and it was setup so that there would be a place to move all the Christian and God-bashing that was taking place all over the forum. It was a real problem.

Clearly, you didn't like my post. Ok. That's your prerogative. Maybe you saw yourself in it. Who knows.

What is clear is that you chose to act like a young child and throw a temper tantrum and start flinging personal insults, not only towards me, but towards women, in general. In case you didn't realize it, that is not only rude, it is collectivism.

How about you grow up.