Can RFK Jr Win? With Special Guest Nicole Shanahan

[Brian4Liberty]

Can RFK Jr Win? With Special Guest Nicole Shanahan

Tech entrepreneur Nicole Shanahan burst into the American political scene when Robert F. Kennedy, Jr announced her as his running mate in what may be the most significant third-party run in recent memory. She joins today's Liberty Report to discuss the ideas that animate her campaign and the hurdles faced by "outsiders" in the duopoly called the American political system.

 

[acptulsa]

We as a country are being tested as to whether or not we're going to put up with this coup any more.

Yes, these people want to "fix it" and are being supported by the most earnest of the "we just have to get the right people in charge of government" crowd.

But if they're sincere, and both have life records which indicate they may well be, they're going to find that the only way to get the swampy out of the swamp is to eliminate bureaus en masse and start over with a clean piece of paper.

That would give us a very, very rare opportunity to ask, "Why did we ever need that agency at all?" over and over. We're good at arguing why they aren't needed. We just need for the subject to come up.

We as a country are being tested as to whether or not we're going to put up with this coup any more. I don't know when or how we could possibly expect a better chance than we have with this Kennedy. It was, after all, his uncle who was lost when this coup was executed. Even the least informed and thoughtful voter can comprehend that concept.

As for Trump, he's just the other proven tool. And now he's promoting nationwide stop-n-frisk. Papers, please.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Not a chance.
And it's disgusting that Ron had her on.
I blame McAdams, he's the one who sided with Macron and the globalists against the Yellow Vests.

 

[Anti Globalist]

Doubtful. RFK's turnout will not be better than Perot's was. At least there were polls back in '92 that actually had him ahead of Bush and Clinton.

 

[acptulsa]

And it's disgusting that Ron had her on.
I blame McAdams...

Ron Paul has never been one to try to silence people.

That's your schtick. No wonder you hate the man and everyone who likes him.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Ron Paul has never been one to try to silence people.

That's your schtick. No wonder you hate the man and everyone who likes him.

It's not silencing someone to not give them your megaphone.
He shouldn't be giving publicity to a commie like her. (Or RFKOMMIE)
They are getting plenty of publicity on their own, and nobody said to try to prevent them.

 

[acptulsa]

It's not silencing someone to not give them your megaphone.
He shouldn't be giving publicity to a commie like her. (Or RFKOMMIE)
They are getting plenty of publicity on their own, and nobody said to try to prevent them.

At least he has some standards, unlike the LP. He doesn't point a microphone at Komrade Trump the Original Funder of Drag Queen Story Hours.

 

[Swordsmyth]

At least he has some standards, unlike the LP. He doesn't point a microphone at Komrade Trump the Original Funder of Drag Queen Story Hours.

Telling that lie about Trump over and over won't make it true.
They started before Trump and Congress was the one putting them in veto proof budgets.

RFKOMMIE is far more likely to support them than Trump who banned trans from the military.

RFKOMMIE is far worse than even your jaundiced fantasies about Trump.

 

[acptulsa]

Telling that lie about Trump over and over won't make it true.
They started before Trump and Congress was the one putting them in veto proof budgets.

Who was the big balls unbeholden alpha swamp draining gator killer who obediently signed those budgets, which could indeed have been vetoed because Constitution?

The fanboi trumpsucking lie "veto proof" is what won't become a thing through repetition.[/QUOTE]

 

[Swordsmyth]

Who was the big balls unbeholden alpha swamp draining gator killer who obediently signed those budgets, which could indeed have been vetoed because Constitution?

The fanboi trumpsucking lie "veto proof" is what won't become a thing through repetition.

It's already a fact in the Constitution, a large enough majority can override any veto, and the uniparty will most certainly do it.
RFKOMMIE says he can't say whether parents should be able to mutilate and poison their children, kind of like how the left suddenly can't define a woman without being a biologist.
He's from the party of child abusing perverts, and you won't catch him opposing it, let alone banning them from the military.

 

[acptulsa]

It's already a fact in the Constitution, a large enough majority can override any veto...

That didn't turn every man who held the office into a mouse.

Even Jimmy Carter was brave enough to nut up, tell Congress to suck eggs, and take his override.

 

[Swordsmyth]

That didn't turn every man who held the office into a mouse.

Even Jimmy Carter was brave enough to nut up, tell Congress to suck eggs, and take his override.

Carter and the others were not fighting their own party as much or more than the opposition and weren't being hounded with false treason charges etc. in never ending impeachment pushes.
They could afford to make more waves even when they accomplished nothing.
Trump could only afford waves that accomplished something.

 

[acptulsa]

Carter and the others were not fighting their own party as much or more than the opposition...

The hell he wasn't. Carter wasn't a member of the CFR. He had no friends in D.C.

 

[Swordsmyth]

The hell he wasn't. Carter wasn't a member of the CFR. He had no friends in D.C.

LOL

Don't make me laugh so hard.
He spent his life trying to destroy America and serving globalism.

 

[acptulsa]

LOL

Don't make me laugh so hard.
He spent his life trying to destroy America and serving globalism.

Is that why he vetoed the repeal of a tariff on imported oil in 1980, just to have Congress override him?

History exists, and this site isn't traditionally a place where you can rewrite it to suit yourself.

And I don't know why I'd waste my time trying to make you laugh. I've never seen the slightest sign you have a sense of humor.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Is that why he vetoed the repeal of a tariff on imported oil in 1980, just to have Congress override him?

History exists, and this site isn't traditionally a place where you can rewrite it to suit yourself.

One overridden veto proves nothing.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Is that why he vetoed the repeal of a tariff on imported oil in 1980, just to have Congress override him?

History exists, and this site isn't traditionally a place where you can rewrite it to suit yourself.

And I don't know why I'd waste my time trying to make you laugh. I've never seen the slightest sign you have a sense of humor.

Lots of Presidents owned by the uniparty have issued vetoes and had them overridden, there are factional differences.
He vetoed that bill because he wanted to stifle our economy with high energy prices.

 

[acptulsa]

Because this says you are a liar:

The fact that you think so doesn't speak well of your grasp of history -- or your ability to read.

https://ballotpedia.org/Donald_Trump:_Vetoed_legislation

President Donald Trump (R) issued ten vetoes during his presidency. One of these vetoes was overridden by Congress.

Carter had cojones enough to veto three times as many bills and force Congress to do the work of overriding him twice as often.

https://www.parkspresidentsandparks.com/blog-page/2021/10/15/the-presidential-veto-1977-1980

I guess that means he had balls two or three times bigger than Trump's.

 

[acptulsa]

Lots of Presidents owned by the uniparty have issued vetoes and had them overridden, there are factional differences.
He vetoed that bill because he wanted to stifle our economy with high energy prices.

And Trump wants tariffs to stifle our economy with high prices too.

Too bad you don't have any more principle than Trump does. You might spend less time contradicting the living snot out of yourself.

 

[Swordsmyth]

The fact that you think so doesn't speak well of your grasp of history -- or your ability to read.



Carter had cojones enough to veto three times as many bills and force Congress to do the work of overriding him twice as often.

https://www.parkspresidentsandparks.com/blog-page/2021/10/15/the-presidential-veto-1977-1980

I guess that means he had balls two or three times bigger than Trump's.

I misread your post and edited my reply.

Carter was as deepstate as they come, and one overridden veto doesn't prove otherwise.