bluesc
Member
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2011
- Messages
- 10,644
Do you want to pull your deeply embedded foot out of your mouth on this one?
I'll keep going.
Do you want to pull your deeply embedded foot out of your mouth on this one?
Seems people have been forgetting the purpose of this campaign.
Iv seen alot of people saying lately stuff like, forget the campaign go grassroots.
Don't you think all that oppose us are dying for the day where our assembly for Ron Paul becomes divided? The campaign is going to do what it chooses to do, our focus is to push our guy and get him in office. If the Ron Paul campaign goes too far out of your belief system, you have full freedom and rights to withdraw your trust in this movement, if you choose to do that...don't cause a rift on your way out.
The last thing we need is Ron Paul supporters fighting between campaign and grassroots, people need to remember we are here for Dr.Paul.
No fight is needed. The grassroots is required to break away if it comes down to a fight between Ron Paul 2012 and Rand Paul 2016.
The grassroots exists to push for Ron in 2012.
Wouldn't this allow the RNC to suck up donations from big banks and the military industrial complex, etc... early on while they still believe that Romney is going to be the nominee? Then if our delegate strategy pays off in the end and Ron gets the nomination, he'll be able to use all these funds against Obama, funds that would have never originally been donated to him by these institutions had they known that Paul was going to be the nominee. If so, I think this is a smart move. They're using Romney's inevitability as a way to amass funding for a campaign against Obama. If all goes well, Romney will never get a chance to use that money and we won't have to rely solely on grassroots donations anymore. We'll have a huge warchest provided by the establishment to take down Obama. It's brilliant!
Wouldn't this allow the RNC to suck up donations from big banks and the military industrial complex, etc... early on while they still believe that Romney is going to be the nominee? Then if our delegate strategy pays off in the end and Ron gets the nomination, he'll be able to use all these funds against Obama, funds that would have never originally been donated to him by these institutions had they known that Paul was going to be the nominee. If so, I think this is a smart move. They're using Romney's inevitability as a way to amass funding for a campaign against Obama. If all goes well, Romney will never get a chance to use that money and we won't have to rely solely on grassroots donations anymore. We'll have a huge warchest provided by the establishment to take down Obama. It's brilliant!
If Rand doesn't deliver his state for Ron, I don't think alot grassroots will follow him later ...
Wouldn't this allow the RNC to suck up donations from big banks and the military industrial complex, etc... early on while they still believe that Romney is going to be the nominee? Then if our delegate strategy pays off in the end and Ron gets the nomination, he'll be able to use all these funds against Obama, funds that would have never originally been donated to him by these institutions had they known that Paul was going to be the nominee. If so, I think this is a smart move. They're using Romney's inevitability as a way to amass funding for a campaign against Obama. If all goes well, Romney will never get a chance to use that money and we won't have to rely solely on grassroots donations anymore. We'll have a huge warchest provided by the establishment to take down Obama. It's brilliant!
Nice smoke and mirrors. The issue is not if the fund was set up, the issue is that it is being USED to support one candidate when that candidate does not have the nomination yet. That's where the problem is.
Now if they want to give equal funding to Paul to run Paul vs Obama ads - that's a different story entirely.
-t
Because he is a plant and is about himself (and whatever interests support him). About time people wake up to what I've known for four years.
Wouldn't this allow the RNC to suck up donations from big banks and the military industrial complex, etc... early on while they still believe that Romney is going to be the nominee? Then if our delegate strategy pays off in the end and Ron gets the nomination, he'll be able to use all these funds against Obama, funds that would have never originally been donated to him by these institutions had they known that Paul was going to be the nominee. If so, I think this is a smart move. They're using Romney's inevitability as a way to amass funding for a campaign against Obama. If all goes well, Romney will never get a chance to use that money and we won't have to rely solely on grassroots donations anymore. We'll have a huge warchest provided by the establishment to take down Obama. It's brilliant!
I’m not sure if it’s going to be a defining issue, but clearly for people in America – where gay marriage is their number one issue, we clearly have two candidates with two different views. On one hand, you’ve got Barack Obama who is now, I guess, going to promote and perhaps crusade for this issue. And you have Mitt Romney who’s been consistent and I think in line with most Americans – which is that marriage ought to be defined between one man and one woman. So, for those people that this is their issue, they have a clear choice.
And this...but I think Bradley is toast.
Just curious. I noticed Glen got 13% in the primary. Would it not have been a wise choice to run to reclaim his House seat in 2012, instead of going for senate? Just wondering.