Ron Paul Calls 'THEM' Out

Joined
Nov 21, 2011
Messages
1,196
Anyone know where this was from? Surely it couldn't be from some public TV appearance lol. But god damn, he really hit a grand slam here. I mean, it's no secret he knows about all of this crap, since being around it his whole life, but ive seldom ever heard him talk about like this.



Lol imagine him saying this at a debate? As soon as he'd be done, youd hear crickets.
 
Last edited:
I believe this is from a Congressional speech. He wanted it to be on the record.. haha
 
that's part of the famous 'neo-conned' speech if i remember correctly. 2003 I believe.
 
Oh snapppp lol. Never heard this one before. Must go viral, mustttt go viral.
 
And they allowed him to live to run for President :)? I hope you guys realize that we can embed people to take over in the same the neoconservatives did. Bush wasn't a neocon, and nor is Obama. The people around them are.
 
What do you think of this?

I don't if this is allowed in America. Here in Brazil, political campaign have a car with loud sound in every city to spread the ideas of the candidates.

If possible, I think people could do this. I would suggest putting this speech, so people learn a little bit about this. That is, instead of playing a loud song on your car, play Ron Paul's speeches.

What do you think about that?
 
I don't if this is allowed in America. Here in Brazil, political campaign have a car with loud sound in every city to spread the ideas of the candidates.

If possible, I think people could do this. I would suggest putting this speech, so people learn a little bit about this. That is, instead of playing a loud song on your car, play Ron Paul's speeches.


What do you think about that?

Lol, reminds me of some theocratic countries like Iran, when you go out side into certain venues or communities there are loudspeakers posted every where, with Islamic sermons playing 24-7 and/or music, to keep the people brainwashed or whatever.

I dont think that would work too well here though, would look way to nazi'ish or communistic.
 
No wonder Bill Kristol, Max Boot, etc. are all calling for Paul's head:

"Neocon spokesman Max Boot brags that what he advocates is “hard Wilsonianism.” In many ways, there's nothing “neo” about their views, and certainly nothing conservative. Yet they have been able to co-op the conservative movement by advertising themselves as a new or modern form of conservatism.

More recently, the modern-day neocons have come from the far left, a group historically identified as former Trotskyists. Liberal Christopher Hitchins has recently officially joined the neocons, and it has been reported that he has already been to the White House as an ad hoc consultant. Many neocons now in positions of influence in Washington can trace their status back to Professor Leo Strauss of the University of Chicago. One of Strauss' books was Thoughts on Machiavelli. This book was not a condemnation of Machiavelli's philosophy. Paul Wolfowitz actually got his PhD under Strauss. Others closely associated with these views are Richard Perle, Eliot Abrams, Robert Kagan and William Kristol. All are key players in designing our new strategy of preemptive war. Others include: Michael Ledeen of the American Enterprise Institute; former CIA Director James Woolsy; Bill Bennett of Book of Virtues fame; Frank Gaffney; Dick Cheney; and Donald Rumsfeld. There are just too many to mention who are philosophically or politically connected to the neocon philosophy in some varying degree.

The godfather of modern-day neo-conservatism is considered to be Irving Kristol, father of Bill Kristol, who set the stage in 1983 with his publication Reflections of a Neoconservative. In this book, Kristol also defends the traditional liberal position on welfare.

More important than the names of people affiliated with neo-conservatism are the views they adhere to. Here is a brief summary of the general understanding of what neocons believe:

1. They agree with Trotsky on permanent revolution, violent as well as intellectual.
2. They are for redrawing the map of the Middle East and are willing to use force to do so.
3. They believe in preemptive war to achieve desired ends.
4. They accept the notion that the ends justify the means — that hard-ball politics is a moral necessity.
5. They express no opposition to the welfare state.
6. They are not bashful about an American empire; instead they strongly endorse it.
7. They believe lying is necessary for the state to survive.
8. They believe a powerful federal government is a benefit.
...
"
 
I always thought that labeling Hitchens as a neocon was a bit hasty and exaggerated, to be honest.
 
It's fun to call them Neo-Trots, which has not yet been labeled an "anti-Semitic."
 
Back
Top