FTFY.Wowthean anarchists[is] really stretching here. Ron doesn't throw his anarchist supporters under the bus, but I have yet to see anyone take his comments at face value and realize that he clearly shows he isn't an anarchist in this video and talks about the fruits of his political involvement.
Wow the anarchists are really stretching here. Ron doesn't throw his anarchist supporters under the bus, but I have yet to see anyone take his comments at face value and realize that he clearly shows he isn't an anarchist in this video and talks about the fruits of his political involvement.
How do you figure? He says anyone who's an anarchist is a libertarian and is for non violence, therefore he is for them. He's clearly pro-anarchy here, but says that he believes working within the system for the purposes of education has merit. If he said, "No, we need government" I would agree with you. But he didn't say this, the only credibility he gave government is that we could use political campaigns for education.
Earlier in the CSpan interview, Ron said that self-government is the goal, and if it isn't possible to get there, then get as close to home as possible. It reiterated that twice.
This is at least the third time in an interview that he's publicly said that self-government is the goal/endgame.
Earlier in the CSpan interview, Ron said that self-government is the goal, and if it isn't possible to get there, then get as close to home as possible. It reiterated that twice.
This is at least the third time in an interview that he's publicly said that self-government is the goal/endgame.
Right, and self-government includes voluntary contractual socialist communes and self-contained police state co-ops.
Exactly. There's another interview from 2008 where the voluntaryists interviewing him asked him the question:
"If given the choice between a small government libertarian society or an anarcho-capitalist society, which would you be for.
Ron answered, clearly: "In that case I would join the anarchists."
Yes he believes in true anarchy, but sees that people can be educated through the political system (as long as it exists).
Can you give me a link?
I was convinced that anarcho-capitalism was the best possible solution since around this time last year, but I kind of assumed that while Ron understood that point of view that he was more of a minarchist. But this thread is really convincing me that I was wrong.
Ron is a CONSTITUTIONALIST. That's the best way to describe him and his views...........
Voluntaryism (or sometimes voluntarism), is a libertarian philosophy which holds that all forms of human association should be voluntary.[SUP][2][/SUP] The principle most frequently used to support voluntaryism is the non-aggression principle (NAP). It is closely associated with, and often used synonymously with, the anarcho-capitalist philosophy.
Many voluntaryists base their thinking on the ideas of voluntaryist philosophers Murray Rothbard and Robert LeFevre. Rothbard maintained, first, that every government "presumes to establish a compulsory monopoly of defense (police and courts) service over some geographical area. So that individual property owners who prefer to subscribe to another defense company within that area are not allowed to do so"; and, second, that every government obtains its income by extortion, euphemistically labeled "taxation". "All governments, however limited they may be otherwise, commit at least these two fundamental crimes against liberty and property."[SUP][3][/SUP]