Ron Paul 2016, MORE VOICES!!!!!

Do you really think the cartel would allow both Rand and Ron in the debates?


Ron will campaign for Rand. I am sue he deserves a rest from running.

This would be likey case.

I have reservations about Rand's foreign policy but so far open to supporting him depending on how he evolves from here on. If Ron Paul campaigned for Rand, then it would be a very easy decision.
 
Last edited:
He's free to do as he pleases. I for one am glad he has chosen to, in his "retirement", sponsor a homeschooling curriculum, a foreign policy think-tank, and start an online TV channel.

My God, Ron Paul has done more for the liberty of humanity in one lifetime than I could hope to achieve in 100. May God bless and keep you, Dr. Paul. I wish there were a more emphatic phrase than, "thank you", to express my appreciation for you, your life, and your efforts.

He's been pretty clear. The way to thank him is to do what Justin Amash and Thomas Massie did. Get involved!
 
I'd support Ron for president in an instant, if he runs. Yet, I doubt there is any chance, I admire the man a great deal, a main reason why I support Rand for president.

There is no doubt in my mind that Ron will fully endorse him with no reluctance. Rand is a good man and I truely believe hes 100% with us, I respect reservations and criticisms of him, but grandiose claims of neocon appeasement is delusional fabrication. Let Rand supporters make their arguement to you, because I feel those who support and respect Rand do so because of their admiration for Ron, atleast to some extent. Rand is 99% similar on the issues as Ron, the man's own words.
 
Last edited:
I think a lot of people are missing the point of this thread.

No one is DEMANDING that Ron run again in 2016. No one is implying that Ron deserves less than to do whatever he wishes to do going forward.

That said, there are those of us who would give 110% of ourselves to Ron's campaign IF he decided to run again, even though I think we all realize that he won't.

Why is that so hard?
 
He's been pretty clear. The way to thank him is to do what Justin Amash and Thomas Massie did. Get involved!

I don't know if you meant that comment this way or not, but I'm tired of the implication directed toward some of us here to get involved as though we aren't already. There are many other ways to get involved in the liberty movement that don't involve being on the inside of the GOP.
 
I think a lot of people are missing the point of this thread.

No one is DEMANDING that Ron run again in 2016. No one is implying that Ron deserves less than to do whatever he wishes to do going forward.

That said, there are those of us who would give 110% of ourselves to Ron's campaign IF he decided to run again, even though I think we all realize that he won't.

Why is that so hard?

I said I would-
But at the same time, are we just engaging in hypothetical fantasy, or is someone trying to "volunteer" Ron for another round of pain?
 
I said I would-
But at the same time, are we just engaging in hypothetical fantasy, or is someone trying to "volunteer" Ron for another round of pain?

Maybe it's just a "shout out" to Ron, "Hey, if you've been wondering or contemplating...um....we're with you all the way!".

edit: 2+ voices of freedom in the debates.
 
i support the ideas of liberty. i love ron.
but my hopes for freedom in my lifetime do not hinge on ron. they hinge on me.

But, you cannot deny that Ron voice in the wilderness has been a big, big boon toward that goal.

edit: And, I'm not implying that you would.
 
Last edited:
sometimessquirrel.gif
 
Pulling...

I wonder how much effort he is putting into the, at least, 3 projects his name is attached to right now.

its not the same as running for office. it is nothing like it.
he runs these projects at his leisure... and is trying to set up foundations that will live beyond him.
 
i support the ideas of liberty. i love ron.
but my hopes for freedom in my lifetime do not hinge on ron. they hinge on me.
I agree with this...and to take that a step further, I would say my hopes for liberty do not hinge on politics.
 
I agree with this...and to take that a step further, I would say my hopes for liberty do not hinge on politics.

politics is a word used to describe the action of men in controlling others.
its not something you just decide you aren't part of- it is force on you.
everywhere you go through the day- the results of politics is weighing upon you. when i need to cope with the scope of how much of this crap interferes with my every minute of life- i sometimes pretend that i can just ignore it...
but that never last long.
 
I don't know if you meant that comment this way or not, but I'm tired of the implication directed toward some of us here to get involved as though we aren't already. There are many other ways to get involved in the liberty movement that don't involve being on the inside of the GOP.

Owe you rep!
 
Back
Top