Roe v Wade overturned ?

Wow! At 50 seconds in. "Outside the quarantine zone a new pathogen has killed 27 people." Sound familiar?


Note the symbolism at a 0:04 mark, on both sides of the screen. Red Jesuit (Vatican)/Knights Templar Crusades crosses. The original design of the symbol carried had the two horizontal lines of equal length. Later it was changed to what is now called the Patriarchal cross or the Cross of Lorraine. It's all the same symbol of the Vatican's foot soldiers.

Hmmm....all SCOTUS justices are all Jesuits and Catholics and administer the City of London's legal and monetary system based on Roman law and trusts. Must all be coincidence.
 
SCOTUS sure has bailed out the Democratic Party for the mid-term election. Dems had precisely -zero- to run on before but now have the biggest of red meat emotional hot buttons to run on.

Every run up to an election invariably some hot button social issue is resurrected just in time for fundraising and soap-boxing.
I'm always reminded of this scene:



Yep!

And one of the greatest movies ever made to show exactly what's going on.
 
Pro-Abortion Protester to Pro-Lifer: ‘I Don’t Love Abortion, I Just Fucking Hate You’

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...-lifer-i-dont-love-abortion-i-fking-hate-you/

HANNAH BLEAU 16 May 2022

A pro-abortion advocate on Saturday told a pro-life demonstrator outside of the Supreme Court that he did not love abortion but just “fucking hate[d]” her, calling her a “controlling, unbelievable bitch.”

“Women deserve better than abortion,” a pro-life activist shouted during protests outside of the Supreme Court on Saturday — protests spurred by the leak of a draft Supreme Court opinion overturning Roe v. Wade.

“Abortion-loving men are creepy,” she repeatedly shouted as an opposing activist shouted “pro-choice!”

“I don’t love abortion. I just fucking hate you. I just hate you,” he later said to the pro-life woman, calling her a “controlling, unbelievable bitch.”

“I don’t love abortion. I just can’t stand her,” he added.

The continued protests — sporadically taking place outside of the Supreme Court as well as outside of the homes of certain Supreme Court justices — follow the historic scandal that took place earlier this month after Politico published a draft Supreme Court opinion overturning Roe.

“It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives,” the draft, reportedly penned by Justice Samuel Alito reads in part.

O7r6NJn.jpg
 
Last edited:
Pro-Abortion Protester to Pro-Lifer: ‘I Don’t Love Abortion, I Just $#@!ing Hate You’

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...-lifer-i-dont-love-abortion-i-fking-hate-you/

HANNAH BLEAU 16 May 2022

A pro-abortion advocate on Saturday told a pro-life demonstrator outside of the Supreme Court that he did not love abortion but just “$#@!ing hate[d]” her, calling her a “controlling, unbelievable bitch.”

“Women deserve better than abortion,” a pro-life activist shouted during protests outside of the Supreme Court on Saturday — protests spurred by the leak of a draft Supreme Court opinion overturning Roe v. Wade.

“Abortion-loving men are creepy,” she repeatedly shouted as an opposing activist shouted “pro-choice!”

“I don’t love abortion. I just $#@!ing hate you. I just hate you,” he later said to the pro-life woman, calling her a “controlling, unbelievable bitch.”

“I don’t love abortion. I just can’t stand her,” he added.

The continued protests — sporadically taking place outside of the Supreme Court as well as outside of the homes of certain Supreme Court justices — follow the historic scandal that took place earlier this month after Politico published a draft Supreme Court opinion overturning Roe.

“It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives,” the draft, reportedly penned by Justice Samuel Alito reads in part.

O7r6NJn.jpg

She should have told him "Your side said if you don't have a uterus you don't get to choose." Then again...

this-trans-man-gave-birth-and-shared-photos-of-the-experience-online-1280x960-768x432-1568225504.jpg
 
[MENTION=849]jmdrake[/MENTION] what about a legal contract the sperm donor gets the possible sperm bucket to sign stating that the sexual encounter was consensual and if by some chance it results in a pregnancy the sperm bucket will under not circumstances abort the baby.
 
Anyone watch the coverage outside the Courthouse Today?

Prayer ran off the Pro Death crowd.

Not covered by MSM.
 
Last edited:
Men need to take control of this by never donating to an unwanted pregnancy. Stop relying on the woman to make sure she doesn't get pregnant.

That's a good idea. Men need more birth control options. I don't know why the FDA has gone 30 years without approving vagasel.

[MENTION=849]jmdrake[/MENTION] what about a legal contract the sperm donor gets the possible sperm bucket to sign stating that the sexual encounter was consensual and if by some chance it results in a pregnancy the sperm bucket will under not circumstances abort the baby.

The most that the sperm donor could expect out of a breach of contract suit in that situation would be to get his money back or whatever else he gave in exchange for the contract. And in most abortions the "sperm donor" doesn't care or may be even encouraging the abortion. If you've got enough money to pay a woman to have a baby for you then you (hopefully) have enough money to pay her to raise the child for you. There are a lot of women happy to accept that arrangement. It's called child support. And this brings us to what's really driving the abortion industry. It's economics. Children used to be an asset. They helped you run the family farm or the family business. If you were too poor to own a farm or a business, at a certain age you could hire them out. They earned their keep. Now, thanks to child labor laws, they are a liability. An increasingly expensive liability. There was no such thing as "child care" expense 100 years ago. Most women worked at home and those who worked outside the home could have friends or relatives raise their kids. Now most women work outside the home and laws in most states require day cares to be licensed. The current corporatist model, the fascists corporations squeeze as much money out of childless adults as they can.

https://www.fastcompany.com/business-case-for-abortion-access
 
I don't watch MSM. Do you have a link on alternative media?

Little MSM,,if any..

Live Streams.. (Indi Journalism)Convoy streamers covered some. ,,though some might have been made private after the Live Stream.

Here is one.

 
Last edited:
Quick question. Why do we care if some leftist wackjob kills their unborn child? If you truely want to win you want numbers right? If fewer of them are having children you guys eventually win right?
 
Quick question. Why do we care if some leftist wackjob kills their unborn child? If you truely want to win you want numbers right? If fewer of them are having children you guys eventually win right?

- It's a matter of principle. The Federal government should not be regulating this, just as they should not be regulating many other things. If we can use the Constitution to set this issue right, we should. It also sets a precedent that could affect many other issues of Federal overreach as well.

- Being pro-life means that we desire the life that is struggling to enter the world to succeed. We believe in God and so we believe in God's will in the life of every individual. There are no accidental people.

- As a matter of faith and righteousness, it is wrong to use just any means to achieve an end. Sure, we definitely do need fewer leftists, but not at any cost. So no, we do not want the unborn in leftist households to be killed because it's still a tragedy.

- As you note, leftism tends to be a "self-solving problem" when left to its own devices, which shows that the root of the problem is not in the popular left but, rather, within the parasitic apparatus of the inflationary warfare State which upholds and promotes these otherwise unsustainable lifestyles and beliefs. There's no point attacking the symptoms while leaving the root-cause untreated. The State is the root cause.
 
Quick question. Why do we care if some leftist wackjob kills their unborn child? If you truely want to win you want numbers right? If fewer of them are having children you guys eventually win right?

Because I would prefer to chuck fully grown Marxists out of helicopters than allow them to kill innocent babies.
 
- It's a matter of principle. The Federal government should not be regulating this, just as they should not be regulating many other things. If we can use the Constitution to set this issue right, we should. It also sets a precedent that could affect many other issues of Federal overreach as well.

- Being pro-life means that we desire the life that is struggling to enter the world to succeed. We believe in God and so we believe in God's will in the life of every individual. There are no accidental people.

- As a matter of faith and righteousness, it is wrong to use just any means to achieve an end. Sure, we definitely do need fewer leftists, but not at any cost. So no, we do not want the unborn in leftist households to be killed because it's still a tragedy.

- As you note, leftism tends to be a "self-solving problem" when left to its own devices, which shows that the root of the problem is not in the popular left but, rather, within the parasitic apparatus of the inflationary warfare State which upholds and promotes these otherwise unsustainable lifestyles and beliefs. There's no point attacking the symptoms while leaving the root-cause untreated. The State is the root cause.

I will take fewer leftist by any means necessary. The ends do justify the means.
I say let "those people" do whatever they please. The rest of us can sit back grab some popcorn and enjoy the object lesson that they provided for us. Anyone with an IQ over 80 who is based can see that leftist behavior isn't conducive to live a productive well adjusted life.
 
Back
Top