RIP: Charlie Kirk Assassinated at Event in Utah

I'll be damned. You're right. I was remembering it ass-backwards. Sorry.

Damn, I just noticed that was a long time ago.

That was a fun trip down memory lane. A lot of her threads have disappeared.
No worries.

Yes, they have and that's a shame.
 
What the actual fuck is the matter with you?

@jmdrake jumped on my ass, just a few posts back in this very thread, for me saying there was an exit wound that is clearly visible.

I don't call our exchange me "jumping your ass" but whatever. I've only seen one would on Charlie Kirk's neck shown in any video or picture and its in the front of his neck and it's pretty small.

And I'll bet solid money, if the pathology report is ever released, that the wound in his neck looks exactly like the photo I posted.

That would be great! The only thing we've heard so far from the reports is that there was no exit wound and the bullet was stopped by his spine.

And by 2007, when this forum was started, I was fully convinced that the official story of 9/11 was utter bullshit.

Yep. So was I. And yet there were some aspects of 9/11 truth that I had to warm up to because I couldn't believe my lying eyes. Take for example the idea that something other than a plane hit the Pentagon. I could have sworn I saw a plane fly into the Pentagon, but I never did. It wasn't until they finally released "proof" that a plane hit the Pentagon when I was like "That's it? Where's the damn plane I was promised?" I was slow to warm up to controlled demolition too. Yes that's in my sig now but at first I thought that was a distraction. I'd rather talk about Able Danger and 9/11 war games and Zacharias Moussoui / Colleen Rowley and the 1993 WTC bombing done by an FBI information. That I was confronted with WTC 7 and, well, I couldn't refute it. I still don't buy the "no plane hit the towers" theory of the oh so popular "Loose Change" documentary.


Here I am discussing "9/11 Truth" back in 2008 with Amy.

I had a long debate thread with her, it was I that took the position that 9/11 was most certainly a government "inside job", although the exact level and mechanics of that could certainly be questioned.

She did not believe that.

(I've searched high and low for it, but came up empty. Maybe The Roach @Occam's Banana could dig it up.)

So why not shut the fuck up about shit you can't remember?

RPG-amy-pi-9-11.jpg



That said, ya'll can sit and spin for all I fucking care.

You've all poisoned the well so fucking badly with harebrained, crackpot theories about how he was killed, that thing I said would happen is now sure to happen, fucking yet again: he will pass from the public eye, be forgotten in a month, and no-fucking-body will be held accountable, again.

Mission fucking accomplished, you fucking asshat.

Well we started down this rabbit hole when you asked me if I thought Israel did it. And I'm still at the same place. I have no proof that Israel did it although Charlie Kirk doubting Oct 7th would be a strong motivation for the Mossad to take him out. But what we're being told currently about a bullet getting lodged in his spine and no exit wound seems sus.
 
Well we started down this rabbit hole when you asked me if I thought Israel did it. And I'm still at the same place. I have no proof that Israel did it although Charlie Kirk doubting Oct 7th would be a strong motivation for the Mossad to take him out. But what we're being told currently about a bullet getting lodged in his spine and no exit wound seems sus.

I was honestly just curious.

I got angry with @acptulsa for calling me a brainwashed CIA stooge WRT to 9/11.

And I hate "well poisoning" almost as much as I hate government inside jobs.

Not everything that ever happens bad in the world is the result of a grand Machiavellian conspiracy.

At the same time, not everything in the world is the truth as it appears on face value.

All I can do is offer some commentary on shooting, bullets and terminal injuries, based on 45 years of shooting, hunting and research.

More than that, I don't know for sure what happened here.

Discernment, long term patience and analysis, and a sense of "justice will be done" is what needs to happen.

The body politic lacks all those abilities.
 
Clips from this interview are starting to make the rounds.

This Cullen dude has been screaming about drones, UAVs and hovering planes from day one.

 


"Brilyn Hollyhand, touted as Charlie Kirk’s successor by establishment media, said that America should increase legal immigration and continue the "melting pot" experiment.

When the audience member added the context that immigrants overwhelmingly vote against American values, Hollyhand said, "We can't close our borders and have our nation."

Hollyhand asserted that America began as a melting pot and that English settlers assimilated into a nation, finally doubling down and saying America should encourage legal immigration.

Hollyhand has faced backlash for promoting his tour as a “Turning Point USA” tour.

Turning Point Action COO Tyler Bowyer recently confirmed that Hollyhand misrepresented his speaking engagements with local chapters, emphasizing that the organization has no affiliation with him and that Hollyhand had let down TPUSA."
 
RIP Charlie, many of us were on the same path as you during the Ron Paul Revolution and thank God you went all the way to inspire us.
We are praying for the truth to come out and for justice to be served.
 


Oops.



Double oops.

It the lead up to 9/11 several events happened that were blamed on Osama Bin Laden and "radical Muslims." Thus when it was clear that 9/11 was a terrorist attack people were already primed to believe the official story. And look at what happened in the lead up to the assassination of Charlie Kirk? "Conservatives" were primed to accept the idea that transgenders (and in this case a "transgender ally") might be dangerous in the same way we were thinking Muslims are inherently dangerous. And it just so happens that CK gets shot right when he's answering a question about transgender gun violence. It could just all be coincidence. In fact some of it likely is coinicdence. But to the extent that prejudice prevents people from questioning the official story, that's always a problem.
 
Back
Top