RIP: Charlie Kirk Assassinated at Event in Utah

[unknown]

This is one of the pricks who threatened Charlie.

 

[unknown]

 

[unknown]

 

[unknown]

Let’s Dissect Andrew Kolvet’s “Miracle” Statement

Andrew Kolvet, a Turning Point USA media handler, released a statement that reads like it was written by a crisis PR firm scrambling to patch up a failing narrative.

Let’s break it down, line by line:

1. “I’m usually not interested in delving into online chatter…”

Translation: “I don’t usually respond to conspiracy drivel… but let me make an exception this time.

”This is the classic defensive opener: discredit public speculation while subtly signaling moral authority — as if his involvement should automatically be trusted.

2. “I just spoke with the surgeon who worked on Charlie in the hospital…

”Problem: Charlie died instantly from a gunshot wound that caused decerebrate posturing, massive arterial bleeding, and catastrophic CNS trauma.

Let’s be clear: he wasn’t “worked on”.

He was dead on arrival — if not at the scene, then certainly before any meaningful medical intervention.

Unless Kolvet thinks surgeons perform autopsies, this claim is either fabricated or a willful misuse of medical terminology to sell emotional closure.

3. “The bullet should’ve gone through… it would’ve killed a moose… but it didn’t…

”This is the “trust me bro” forensic analysis from someone with no background in terminal ballistics, gunshot trauma, or even basic anatomy.

If the bullet lodged beneath the skin, that suggests low velocity, deflection, or inconsistency in caliber used — none of which support the idea of a clean high-powered rifle kill.

Also: where’s the actual ballistics report?

4. “His bones were so strong, like the man of steel.”

Now we’re just fully in the realm of myth-making.

Turning a human corpse into Superman doesn’t just defy science — it tells you exactly what this is:

A psychological operation meant to close the book on forensic doubt and redirect the public into emotional worship of the martyr.

5. “Even in death, Charlie managed to save others. Remarkable. Miraculous.”

This is narrative closure layered on top of miracle-language.

In legal or psychological terms, this is called “preemptive emotional closure” — used to block further questioning by dressing tragedy in divine finality.

When a known TPUSA employee uses miracle-language, contradictory medical claims, and a triple “trust me” format — all without forensic transparency — it’s not just cringe.

It’s coordinated damage control.The truth doesn’t require miracles.

It leaves evidence."

 

[unknown]

There it is.

The 33 hours to find Charlie Kirk’s suspected killer: ‘No sleep, go to work’

Charlie Kirk was assassinated Wednesday at Utah Valley University as he appeared at a debate forum.

www.yahoo.com

"Entin said the Utah County sheriff confirmed Kirk was not wearing armor, not that it would have made a difference in Wednesday’s shooting."

 

[ClaytonB]

 

[unknown]

If nothing else, the comments are entertaining.

Referring to this guy:

https://files.catbox.moe/2cbwxn.mp4

IF that's the same guy, that alone would be sus AF.

 

[unknown]

 

[acptulsa]

There is no need for ten thousand multifaceted, 24 layer conspiracy theories to explain this.

We know, we know. You're perfectly happy with what the government spoon-fed you, ridiculous as it is so far as the evidence goes, because it fits your prejudices so nicely.

Just like Butler.

Just like 9/11.

And you refuse to look at Butler or this as critically as you eventually looked at 9/11 because I'm not as cute and charming as Amy.

We know.

Hey. You're not alone. I know another "my scientific method is ignoring all evidence that doesn't fit the official MSM narrative" type, and she has a PhD in physics!

 

[acptulsa]

Is this correct, that images of the rifle were not released until the 11th?

Yes.

 

[acptulsa]

No mention of body armor?

I'm assuming that he would know.

In the absence of body armor and the round fragmenting, we're being told that the we witnessed the entire round's entry wound...

In which case, the official explanation, is gay AF.

What bone?

The only bones in the neck are vertebrae, and you can displace those by sleeping on an unfamiliar pillow. Even if it were made of solid carbon steel, a 30.06 round would have knocked the one it hit right out of line with the rest and out the back of his neck.

 

[Anti Federalist]

And you refuse to look at Butler or this as critically as you eventually looked at 9/11 because I'm not as cute and charming as Amy.

I have always maintained that 9/11 was a LIHOP situation.

Yes, Muslim terrorists want to kill Westerners and take over in the name of Allah.

The men who flew those planes were assisted and aided by elements of the US government, in order for the event to happen.

They are doing the same thing now, by whipping up the Bolsheviks to kill us.

Only it's much easier with domestic stock.

I believe a jihadist when he says he wants to kill me.

I believe a Queer Race Communist when he says the same thing.

 

[CaptUSA]

We know, we know. You're perfectly happy with what the government spoon-fed you, ridiculous as it is so far as the evidence goes, because it fits your prejudices so nicely.

Just like Butler.

Just like 9/11.

And you refuse to look at Butler or this as critically as you eventually looked at 9/11 because I'm not as cute and charming as Amy.

We know.

Hey. You're not alone. I know another "my scientific method is ignoring all evidence that doesn't fit the official MSM narrative" type, and she has a PhD in physics!

Still have questions - just no real answers.

From everything I've seen, it seems like we know the shooters in Butler and Utah. I also think there are lots of things we're missing. Especially, what led up to those events and what kind of contact these kids had with intelligence agencies ahead of their acts.

All of this stuff about Robinson not being the shooter, seems... like a reach.

 

[Anti Federalist]

Still have questions - just no real answers.

From everything I've seen, it seems like we know the shooters in Butler and Utah. I also think there are lots of things we're missing. Especially, what led up to those events and what kind of contact these kids had with intelligence agencies ahead of their acts.

All of this stuff about Robinson not being the shooter, seems... like a reach.

In spite of whatever nonsense @acptulsa wants to throw my way, (I guess he's looking for a new swordsmyth to bash), I have questions as well.

But there is a difference between asking questions and carefully weighing the answers, and simply throwing whatever shit you can lay your hands on and seeing what sticks.

When that happens, nothing happens.

No questions get answered and nobody is held accountable.

 

[Anti Federalist]

See, this is precisely what I am talking about.

Anybody who knows anything about ballistics would know that a projectile fired from such a gun would not have the downrange energy to do the soft tissue damage that we all saw, in real time, to Charlie Kirk's neck.

Whatever shot Kirk, it was not a palm gun or cel phone derringer or PU 235 Explosive Space Modulator.

It was a relatively high power rifle round of .30 caliber or greater.

 

[acptulsa]

I have always maintained that 9/11 was a LIHOP situation...

The men who flew those planes were assisted and aided by elements of the US government, in order for the event to happen.

That is, by definition, not LIHOP but MIHOP. If government aided and assisted they helped make it happen.

 

[acptulsa]

In spite of whatever nonsense @acptulsa wants to throw my way, (I guess he's looking for a new swordsmyth to bash), I have questions as well.

But there is difference between asking questions and carefully weighing the answers, and simply throwing whatever shit you can lay your hands on and seeing what sticks.

See, this is precisely what I am talking about.

Anybody who knows anything about ballistics would know that a projectile fired from such a gun would not have the downrange energy to do the soft tissue damage that we all saw, in real time, to Charlie Kirk's neck.

I'm not sure that's true, or even what difference it makes. I don't see anyone firing a palm gun from 147 yards. There isn't a vantage point off to Kirk's right (which is where many believe the shot must really have come from) that far away. Therefore you can't even define the range you're talking about. You're either missing or deflecting from the point, which isn't that someone could have used a palm gun from a roof, but that they might have gotten away with using one from much closer, in the crowd.

Not that I care. I have no vested interest in that or any other alternative theory. I have not posted one thing about a palm gun. But I am posting this. Are you looking at the official narrative with a critical eye, or are you saying, a leftist killed a rightie and I don't want to be confused with facts because I'm invested in that narrative?



The official narrative is a joke. We are not done, not poking holes into it, but pointing out the holes that are baked into it.
Bullshit like that may satisfy you under the circumstances...

There is no need for ten thousand multifaceted, 24 layer conspiracy theories to explain this.

Not when you have the governor of California and scores just like him, whipping up the Marxists into a homicidal rage on a daily basis.

When they say they want you dead, believe them when they say it.

...but it does nothing to satisfy me. And no, Swordsmyth (God rest him) has nothing whatsoever to do with it. Doing things because of personalities, or teams and their preferred narratives, is your style, not mine. I want the truth to come out. I'll be satisfied with the truth, no matter how appalling, and not satisfied with anything else, no matter how appealing.

 

[acptulsa]

His narrative powers have improved in the last three years.

 

[Snowball]

Make sure to post it when its done.

This will reveal the agenda. If she tries to wipe it away, we know she's compromised.

 

[Brian4Liberty]

See, this is precisely what I am talking about.

Anybody who knows anything about ballistics would know that a projectile fired from such a gun would not have the downrange energy to do the soft tissue damage that we all saw, in real time, to Charlie Kirk's neck.

Whatever shot Kirk, it was not a palm gun or cel phone derringer or PU 235 Explosive Space Modulator.

It was a relatively high power rifle round of .30 caliber or greater.

Come on AF, you are too skeptical. It was 4 simultaneous shooters, so it only seemed like a single shot. Very tight coordination. Hard to say, where all of the rounds went, but it is possible that Charlie was hit by more than one.