RIP: Charlie Kirk Assassinated at Event in Utah

How the hell could they possibly know that the bullet passed close to the person asking Kirk a question?

I posted a map yesterday. Why did the cop go climb up on that particular roof?

 
There is no need for ten thousand multifaceted, 24 layer conspiracy theories to explain this.

Not when you have the governor of California and scores just like him, whipping up the Marxists into a homicidal rage on a daily basis.

When they say they want you dead, believe them when they say it.

 
There is no need for ten thousand multifaceted, 24 layer conspiracy theories to explain this.

We know, we know. You're perfectly happy with what the government spoon-fed you, ridiculous as it is so far as the evidence goes, because it fits your prejudices so nicely.

Just like Butler.

Just like 9/11.

And you refuse to look at Butler or this as critically as you eventually looked at 9/11 because I'm not as cute and charming as Amy.

We know.

Hey. You're not alone. I know another "my scientific method is ignoring all evidence that doesn't fit the official MSM narrative" type, and she has a PhD in physics!
 
And you refuse to look at Butler or this as critically as you eventually looked at 9/11 because I'm not as cute and charming as Amy.

I have always maintained that 9/11 was a LIHOP situation.

Yes, Muslim terrorists want to kill Westerners and take over in the name of Allah.

The men who flew those planes were assisted and aided by elements of the US government, in order for the event to happen.

They are doing the same thing now, by whipping up the Bolsheviks to kill us.

Only it's much easier with domestic stock.

I believe a jihadist when he says he wants to kill me.

I believe a Queer Race Communist when he says the same thing.
 
We know, we know. You're perfectly happy with what the government spoon-fed you, ridiculous as it is so far as the evidence goes, because it fits your prejudices so nicely.

Just like Butler.

Just like 9/11.

And you refuse to look at Butler or this as critically as you eventually looked at 9/11 because I'm not as cute and charming as Amy.

We know.

Hey. You're not alone. I know another "my scientific method is ignoring all evidence that doesn't fit the official MSM narrative" type, and she has a PhD in physics!
Still have questions - just no real answers.

From everything I've seen, it seems like we know the shooters in Butler and Utah. I also think there are lots of things we're missing. Especially, what led up to those events and what kind of contact these kids had with intelligence agencies ahead of their acts.

All of this stuff about Robinson not being the shooter, seems... like a reach.
 
Still have questions - just no real answers.

From everything I've seen, it seems like we know the shooters in Butler and Utah. I also think there are lots of things we're missing. Especially, what led up to those events and what kind of contact these kids had with intelligence agencies ahead of their acts.

All of this stuff about Robinson not being the shooter, seems... like a reach.

In spite of whatever nonsense @acptulsa wants to throw my way, (I guess he's looking for a new swordsmyth to bash), I have questions as well.

But there is a difference between asking questions and carefully weighing the answers, and simply throwing whatever shit you can lay your hands on and seeing what sticks.

When that happens, nothing happens.

No questions get answered and nobody is held accountable.
 
Last edited:
See, this is precisely what I am talking about.

Anybody who knows anything about ballistics would know that a projectile fired from such a gun would not have the downrange energy to do the soft tissue damage that we all saw, in real time, to Charlie Kirk's neck.

Whatever shot Kirk, it was not a palm gun or cel phone derringer or PU 235 Explosive Space Modulator.

It was a relatively high power rifle round of .30 caliber or greater.

 
Back
Top