Richard Viguerie: Ron Paul 'Shocking and Disappointing;'

[phree]

You expect me to take your word for it, but you don't believe I voted for him in 1988 because I didn't hear about this forum until after Christmas? Your logical fallacies are as numerous as they are patently goofy.

P.S. Actions still speak louder than words, troll.

You obviously care more about feeding a troll (if he is one), than addressing an important issue. Post on forums much?

 

[acptulsa]

You obviously care more about feeding a troll (if he is one), than addressing an important issue. Post on forums much?

I have weighed in on both the endorsement question and the earmark question. Read through threads much before you start barking?

 

[kylejack]

You expect me to take your word for it, but you don't believe I voted for him in 1988 because I didn't hear about this forum until after Christmas? Your logical fallacies are as numerous as they are patently goofy.

P.S. Actions still speak louder than words, troll.

FYI: I still don't care and would like to discuss the topic of this thread.

 

[phree]

I have weighed in on both the endorsement question and the earmark question. Read through threads much before you start barking?

There is nothing inappropriate about criticizing someone for keeping a thread off-topic. So fuck off.

 

[acptulsa]

There is nothing inappropriate about criticizing someone for keeping a thread off-topic. So fuck off.

Nah, too easy. I just can't do it.

 

[Sandra]

There is nothing inappropriate about criticizing someone for keeping a thread off-topic. So fuck off.

And you posted here because.............

 

[kylejack]

let it go

 

[acptulsa]

let it go

Ja vohl, mein herr!

 

[Sandra]

let it go

Man! and he printed it in BOLD! We better back off and give him the last word!

 

[Rhys]

So, hurling insults at people is the right way to handle them asking questions about what Ron Paul is earmarking money for?

I have no problem with him earmarking money, but I posted certain things that he requested money for, like security cameras, and money for Washington, D.C. schools. And I wanted to know why he asked for those things.

Instead, I get:



Maybe if you answered questions instead of cursing, insulting, and acting like a jerk...

everything I said is truth, not an insult. I answered you, you just dismissed it off hand without knowing what you're talking about. That's why I have low opinions of so many who post here.... high strung dip shits.

 

[SnappleLlama]

*grabs popcorn much too late*

So THIS is what happens when I leave for a few weeks, eh?

 

[phree]

And you posted here because.............

I posted here because I want to understand the subject of this thread. In case you've had even more koolaid than usual the subject is Ron Paul endorsing Don Young. My posts have been on topic.

From the day I discovered RP I've been committed to voting for whoever he endorsed. I don't live in Alaska, but how he uses the power of his endorsement is extremely important to me. If you can't deduce that from my posts you either aren't trying or you don't have good comprehension. The fact that you pointed to Young's position on Iran as a rationalization for the endorsement makes me think it's the latter.

 

[qh4dotcom]

Okay gang....many of you defending the earmarks probably haven't seen the earmark requests themselves with RP's signature....here you go

http://i.cnn.net/cnn/interactive/allpolitics/0706/popup.congress.earmarks/pdfs/tx.14.paul.pdf

 

[kylejack]

Ron Paul also submitted an earmark request for a portion of the Trans-Texas Corridor.

 

[acptulsa]

Okay gang....many of you defending the earmarks probably haven't seen the earmark request themselves with RP's signature....here you go

http://i.cnn.net/cnn/interactive/allpolitics/0706/popup.congress.earmarks/pdfs/tx.14.paul.pdf

You want to change my mind show me where Ron Paul voted for this stuff.

 

[Sandra]

Right now, Congress is focusing on a strike on Iran. Young seems to be one of the few that backs diplomacy. Anybody backing diplomacy gets my backing too. We can sort out the other stuff once we get more noninterventionalists in. Young may have at one time backed the was in Iraq but it's evident he thinks differently on Iran now.

 

[phree]

Right now, Congress is focusing on a strike on Iran. Young seems to be one of the few that backs diplomacy. Anybody backing diplomacy gets my backing too. We can sort out the other stuff once we get more noninterventionalists in. Young may have at one time backed the was in Iraq but it's evident he thinks differently on Iran now.

Sandra, really....

Young on Iran:

The Iranian regime’s record on human rights, its links to terrorist groups such as Lebanese Hezbollah and Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and its well-documented attitude towards Israel are outrageous. I am continuing to urge Congress to make strong gestures to the Iranian regime regarding its treatment of its citizens.



I have serious concerns about the nature of Iran’s nuclear activities, and share international concern that the aims of the Iranian nuclear program are not exclusively peaceful. I will continue to support the international community’s efforts to resolve the issue through diplomacy. It is important to place the maximum pressure on Iran to return to meaningful negotiations about its nuclear ambitions and to fully meet the requirements of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). I welcome the June 2006 initiative put forward by Germany and the five permanent members of the Security Council, which offers Iran a wide-ranging basis for negotiations and a positive future relationship, in return for the suspension of its nuclear enrichment program and a return to meaningful negotiations.



Furthermore, I will support measures against Iran if it fails to comply with the Security Council. These should include banning all international nuclear co-operations with Iran, halting the sale of dual-use nuclear technology and military technology to it, and prohibiting new international investment in oil and gas projects in the country. The United States remains at the forefront of efforts to generate and maintain consensus over Iran. We hope that the united front that the permanent members of the Security Council have shown will be maintained now that we are approaching a critical juncture in our dealings with Iran.

 

[Sandra]

Ron Paul also submitted an earmark request for a portion of the Trans-Texas Corridor.

Give us a source or shut up! You have made so many claims and when asked for a source, you change the subject. You are proving yourself a troll.

 

[kylejack]

Give us a source or shut up! You have made so many claims and when asked for a source, you change the subject. You are proving yourself a troll.

I told you, you're cut off until you provide a source for your claim that Congress members are required by law to submit earmark requests (hint: they're not).

 

[Kludge]

I told you, you're cut off until you provide a source for your claim that Congress members are required by law to submit earmark requests (hint: they're not).

You're obviously a DHS psy-ops troll sent to convince us Ron Paul isn't the Messiah and that rainbows in the water supply is OK.

Personally, I hope you get banned.