PPP had us leading in Iowa in their final poll, when everyone else did not. Every poll is flawed, and no poll is 100% on the money. A poll may say it can say with 95% confidence that the numbers are correct within a 4% margin of error. Well that means that 5% of the time, the numbers are wrong even more than the margin of error (this might have happened in that infamous Santorum CNN poll). All polls are fallible unless God himself is conducting them.Because I trust PPP more.
The 9% and 20% were both from ARG, i think, and we're clearly now at the high end of that.From the 5 polls I've seen the last couple days:
Romney: 28-37%
Gingrich: 12-25%
Paul: 9-20%
Santorum: 7-16%
I'm not sure how to explain those kinds of spreads.
Remember Iowa. It's very possible for a candidate to surge or crash quickly.Yesterday Gingrich was at 24% and now he is at 12%... yeah right. This poll is complete BS.
That about sums it up, Mitt's super PAC is hitting Santorum hard as well.I know why Newt went down mitt romeny's super PAC just spent over 7 million against new Gingrich in 10 days, super PAC called Restore Our Future..
http://www.jpost.com/Headlines/Article.aspx?id=253637
Romney: 37%
Paul: 16%
Santorum: 16%
Gingrich 12%
I don't know what to think of this one. I have a hard time believing Romney is that high and Gingrich that low, but I also believe we are in the middle of a Ron Paul surge and things could shift.
A distant 2nd is perceived as better than a close 3rd. I'll take it, if we push to 2nd and Romney is on top.Looks like New Hampshire, ugh. Hard to believe Romney is that high.
Didn't know that. Perhaps it is, then.1. conducted online
2. registered voters rather than likely voters
This poll is crap.
Need a source for the conducted online notion.
Reuters/Ipsos are generally telephone calls, and included in RCP average.
1. conducted online
2. registered voters rather than likely voters
This poll is crap.
If we look at this poll in a bubble it would seem that Gingrich is falling and his support is going to Romney.