Republican Presidential Debate to Exclude Ron Paul

[Craig_R]

We should do that, but also all chant in unison, "RON PAUL RON PAUL RON PAUL!"

its stuff like that , that the msm uses to paint us as crazy

 

[literatim]

CNN/Opinion Research Corporation Poll
11/3/2007
w/o Newt Gingrich
Margin of Error = 4.4% [?]
Rudy Giuliani 28%
Fred Thompson 19%
John McCain 16%
Mitt Romney 11%
Mike Huckabee 10%
Ron Paul 5%
Duncan Hunter 4%
Tom Tancredo 3%
Unsure 5%

It seems Unsure could be getting an invite. How's he coming along in Iowa?

 

[kevman657]

Guys, don't get off track. It doesn't matter if RP gets 5% in time or not. This is a matter of free speech and liberty. ALL the candidates should be allowed to participate whether the Iowa Republicans think so or not. It is the smaller voices that matter the most, always. Everyone already knows what the mainstream puppets have to say.

Yeah but, we need to confirm this before we attack Fox. What if this is totally false and they just think we're crazy?

 

[ladyliberty]

if we make big announcements they will have the riot police and swat teams to haul us away upon arrival - better to do this incognito - underground effort works best.

just sort of "show up" on December 4 (or come earlier when they aren't expecting us) and not be an angry hostile mob, but peaceful concerned citizens...well organized, peaceful demonstrators, with big signs and big mouths!

 

[Falseflagop]

You guys make me laugh you really believe those POLL NUMBERS??

Are you kidding me. RP would be the top 2!! If these guys were so popular where are their people with signs promoting them??


Please wake up people!! This is the same shit with the IOWA TAX debate remember that!

 

[parke]

Time for civil disobedience. I say RP supporters upset the debate. Then organize the meetups to protest outside of fox newstations around the country.

 

[Mortikhi]

Time for civil disobedience. I say RP supporters upset the debate. Then organize the meetups to protest outside of fox newstations around the country.

If its true, Im there with you

 

[Johnnybags]

Relax- we simply rent the Hall next door

and cheer thunderously at a 5-1 outnumbered margin at the same time. FOX has gone mad, I think you can all see now FOX is a government news channel. He will never see 5 percent on national polls and the ARG one is a simple chamber of commerce poll. Let the campaign make the first move.

 

[fletcher]

Don't these polls usually have a margin of error of about 5? What a joke.

 

[RadioDJforPaul]

I think Fox News will let him in it because they would rather let him in the debate and ignore him, than face the wrath and the bad pub they would get if they dont let him in.

 

[kickzman]

Come on guys I don't think they could exclude Dr Paul with the money we have raised... and remember these donations are small so literally there are thousands upon thousands of donators.. They wouldn't dare do it, the blowback would be MASSIVE.

 

[axiomata]

This should be motivation for us to get his poll numbers up.

 

[belian78]

Come on guys I don't think they could exclude Dr Paul with the money we have raised... and remember these donations are small so literally there are thousands upon thousands of donators.. They wouldn't dare do it, the blowback would be MASSIVE.

i wouldnt put it past them, and yes the blowback would be massive. I'm looking forward to it.

 

[ClayTrainor]

If they do this, the world will wake up to the corruption... they dont realize how big the support actually is.

FUCK THE MSM... those bastards hate freedom.

 

[davidhperry]

Before this gets out of hand, lets confirm this with HQ.
If true then we need to get on the phones and call people in Iowa and get the polls up.

Yes, this is coming from one source - hearsay basically. I'm all for opening up both barrels on these folks if Ron Paul isn't invited be we must get the facts before we can be effective. Let's see what HQ has to say. If need be, we'll unload on these people.

 

[Original_Intent]

This could be the biggest thing to happen to the campaign if this is true.

We would get far more attention from an exclusions (and the ensuing surge of angry Paul supporters) than Ron is likely to get in the debates.

All those people that signed up for ThisNovember5th.com - when that crowd of 21,000+ new enthusiastic supporters as well as the rest of us feel that we are being sidelined..... I see serious repurcussions. Peaceful, but not able to be ignored.

Frankly, I will be amazed if Ron Paul is not invited. They have got to realize what will happen if he is excluded.

 

[Johnnybags]

That was before yesterday - The establishment

I think Fox News will let him in it because they would rather let him in the debate and ignore him, than face the wrath and the bad pub they would get if they dont let him in.

has the gloves off, how can an obscure Texas congressman think he can be President? Mitt will be forced to throw 20 million more in, Rudy too and the others are there for flank protection. No way Ron gets in but strangely enough, everytime they sh*t on him he gets more popular. I see bus charters from every corner of the US hammering this event if they pull this.

 

[sylvania]

This is not surprising and it isn't just the media.

1. Iowa Tax debate (Excluded RP)
2. Iowa Straw Poll (Remeber the Vote in Sunshine issues)

Iowa GOP does not like RP. He thwarted their moves during the Iowa Tax debate and then caused them massive amounts of grief with his supporters flooding their office with phone calls during the Iowa Straw Poll..

But until I hear from an official that he has been excluded, I'll just hope that isn't the case.

 

[Syren123]

Not these turds again.

Okay so they play their usual game. We urge HQ to spend some of our bake sale money to run bitchen ads the whole week before the debate.

Then we'll see who polls what.

 

[dircha]

We will car pool in 5,000 people.

We will infiltrate their audience and disrupt their prime time programming with Ron Paul chants and t-shirts.

It will be the biggest embarrassment Fox News has ever seen.

Find out how we get in that audience.