Republican presidential candidates in 2016 (Reuters 5-Day Rolling poll)

[Patrick Henry]

http://polling.reuters.com/#!respon...ID_:2/dates/20150808-20150929/collapsed/false

Trump 30%
Carson 12.9%
Fiorina 10.8%
Bush 9.8%
Paul 5.6%
Rubio 5.3%
Huckabee 5.2%
Cruz 5.1%
Christie 3.2%
Jindal 1.5%
Kasich 1.4%
Santorum 1.4%
Pataki .3%
Graham .1%

 

[chronicaust]

Interesting! Gaining ground?!

 

[liberty_nc]

Does this poll count? Like in RCP average? or just a internet poll?

 

[Crashland]

I didn't realize they even had this, thanks for the link. It's interesting to play with the filters too

 

[luctor-et-emergo]

Now this is more of a realistic poll of how the landscape looks right now. It's still low-information season. Based on name recognition and media. Not a whole lot based on who people would actually support..

Sucks for Lindsey though.

 

[01000110]

Looking better!

 

[eleganz]

Interesting! Gaining ground?!

he isn't gaining ground.

We all need to look at these numbers with a calm and reasonable mind.

Rand has been between 2 and 6% (all within most surveys' margin of error) since before the first debate.

For Rand to average out to 5.6% might be telling us that he is on the higher end on the 2-6% spectrum but it is very difficult to tell.

It is hard to break out of this until Trump's grip on the low info voters is loosened. The most important thing to take away from this is that Rand hasn't been rising or falling for at least the last two months so all of the knee jerk reaction from liberty supporters is unwarranted and based on emotion more than fact.

Another takeaway is that we are still early in the Season and anything can happen, I think Fiorina might be next to be the front runner...

 

[Jan2017]

Yes, thanks for the link - people like Kasich don't have weird spikes suddenly in these moving averages.



.

 

[brandon]

I can't find the source data for the poll, but the OP is misleading. When you only look at likely Republican primary voters, Rand gets 2.9%. About the same as the other polls.

http://polling.reuters.com/#!respon...ID_:2/dates/20150808-20150929/collapsed/false

 

[LatinsforPaul]

I can't find the source data for the poll, but the OP is misleading. When you only look at likely Republican primary voters, Rand gets 2.9%. About the same as the other polls.

http://polling.reuters.com/#!respon...ID_:2/dates/20150808-20150929/collapsed/false

The OP is not misleading as he stated (Reuters 5-Day Rolling poll).

 

[65fastback2+2]

I can't find the source data for the poll, but the OP is misleading. When you only look at likely Republican primary voters, Rand gets 2.9%. About the same as the other polls.

http://polling.reuters.com/#!respon...ID_:2/dates/20150808-20150929/collapsed/false

you only worry about republican primary voters only if you're interested in losing.

winners look at all voters because they plan to grab some from other demographics.

 

[brandon]

The OP is not misleading as he stated (Reuters 5-Day Rolling poll).

Not sure what you mean. I agree that this is a "Reuters 5-Day Rolling poll"

 

[William Tell]

http://polling.reuters.com/#!respon...ID_:2/dates/20150808-20150929/collapsed/false

Trump 30%
Carson 12.9%
Fiorina 10.8%
Bush 9.8%
Paul 5.6%
Rubio 5.3%
Huckabee 5.2%
Cruz 5.1%
Christie 3.2%
Jindal 1.5%
Kasich 1.4%
Santorum 1.4%
Pataki .3%
Graham .1%

Thanks for posting!

 

[carlton]

Republican presidential candidates in 2016 (Reuters 5-Day Rolling poll, Paul in 5th)

Trump 30%
Carson 12.9%
Fiorina 10.8%
Bush 9.8%
Paul 5.6%
Rubio 5.3%
Huckabee 5.2%
Cruz 5.1%
Christie 3.2%
Jindal 1.5%
Kasich 1.4%
Santorum 1.4%
Pataki .3%
Graham .1

​Read more at polling.reuters.com ...

 

[Kotin]

Hmm well this could help with the debate invite..

 

[carlton]

Hmm well this could help with the debate invite..

Its not in RCP avg

 

[65fastback2+2]

repost, fyi: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...ndidates-in-2016-(Reuters-5-Day-Rolling-poll)

 

[kahless]

The RNC has not released the debate criteria to be used for the Oct. 28 debate. At one point they mentioned using New Hampshire and Iowa polls which would exclude Rand, Christie and others.

 

[Liberty Commentary]

This is great news?

 

[erowe1]

This is great news?

I'd call it good news. But the numbers aren't anything especially remarkable. It's essentially a 4-way tie for 5th place, pretty much the same as all the other recent polls, accounting for margins of error.