In an open primary state, I have no reason to be a Republican party member. It would make me feel dirty inside anyway at this point.
When I hear people say stuff like this - I can't help but think that they're projecting what other people think about the republican party onto themselves. Just remember, you are you - not what others think you are.
In other words, when I hear people say things like "makes me feel dirty inside" I can't help but get the impression that you're afraid of what others might think of you. Unless you're doing something wrong and selfish - why should it feel unjust?
I too am not sure if I'll remain in the republican party or revert back to libertarian, but I sure as hell won't do it because I care what others think of the party. If I am to remain in the Republican party, it would be to uphold the values and message that Ron Paul is fighting for.
I really dislike all of this upper/lower case party stuff..
(in jest)
What do you call people from India?
I'm stuck...I don't know what to do. Should I stay a Republican or switch to Libertarian. They both have benefits and setbacks
Republican - Already recognized. Easier to vote for people, BUT (the BIG but) as long as I'm registered Repub I have to deal with those dirty neo-cons. They will bother me and I don't even want to be seen near any of them lol. Plus being a republican they automatically assume your a dirty neo-con as well lol
Libertarian - They agree with everything I do, and it would be so much easier to deal with those guys calling me lol. At the same time it's hard for any candidate to get on ballots.
Logic tells me to stay Republican for the voting reasons, but I don't know if I can deal with it lol
Anyway what are you guys doing?
I would agree, but amend it a little.
Stay Republican, but vote whoever is likely to represent the ideals of maximum liberty, combined with the best chance of actually enacting those ideals into policy.
If you have a 3-way race, a run-of-the-mill Democrat, a Libertarian polling at 5%, and a Ron Paul style Republican who agrees 90% with Ron Paul and is polling even with the Democrat, vote the Republican.
Same is true if it's a Democrat who will 90% stand up for liberty, vs. a Neo-con... vote the Democrat.
If it's an average Democrat (socialist) and an average Republican (neocon), then look for a Libertarian or Constitution party candidate to vote for... don't vote for the lesser of two evils.
That's what I'll do, anyways... just my two cents.
By the way, the purpose of staying Republican is not to vote Republican, particularly... except in the occasional cases of a Ron Paul/libertarian Republican in a contested primary. In the general election, you can vote for whomever anyways. The point of staying in, is to take over the party by numbers at the grassroots level party meetings, where 99.5% of Republicans never bother to get involved. If we do get involved, en masse, we can take over the Republican platform, and eventually elect our own kind to national Republican leadership positions, and start swaying the voters to the side of liberty through the official party, rather than be mostly locked out like this year with the current Neocon leadership.
I've been trying to work out this one in my head:
Does constitutionalist = libertarian (is Constitutionalism Libertarianism)
Is this what the Republic was meant to be in the first place and were the people living there called republicans.
I've been trying to work out this one in my head:
Does constitutionalist = libertarian (is Constitutionalism Libertarianism)
Is this what the Republic was meant to be in the first place and were the people living there called republicans.
I'm a little 'l' libertarian and a big 'R' Republican.