Fwiw, my post wasn't really directed specifically at yours even though I used it as a quote, sorry. I have a habit of quoting posts just as a springboard for my further thoughts. Sometimes I forget there is another person on the other side of the post who make take my comment more personally than it was intended to be.
That's an odd question on a generally anti-war movement forum. Having said that, he's likely been put in the position for a purpose. His war profiteering background may become relevant to future events, given the overall trajectory and VA's outsized position in "domestic events" the last few years.
That's the point. There is no time being bought. Just a shift in the narrative and a new guy in charge to handle the shift, and whatever that shift entails.
I agree. Too busy worrying about what some politician or billionaire business tycoon will do to institute more liberty....
My plan is to stop believing electoral action will change anything since 1) candidates of note are all part of "Team WEF" and 2) the system has been rigged to steal elections from anyone else who may slip through. I think both of those points have been abundantly proven over the years. The first step to a successful plan is recognizing losing moves before they are made and abandoning them as options. It's all about individual action these days and what are you going to do yourself? If that is voting, great, but know it won't change much, if anything and it's just mental masturbation over the latest R v D non-choice. Yes, I'm sure you do know that but yet here we are in yet another election thread, as if the outcome mattered.
