Republican Glenn Youngkin WINS in Virginia, Republican Also Winning in NJ at Midnight

[Anti Federalist]

Shem, Glenn and Ron all took the position of 'if we didn't run R we would have no voice at all'. I wouldn't call that an endorsement of the Republican party.

No, it's not...never said it was.

We have to stop playing divide and conquer games.

Who's dividing and conquering whom?

Of course I am going to "divide" from Marxist swine.

At current, our entire political system is corrupt to the root. Alternate societies and local conglomerates should be everyone's focus, not trying to 'beat the other team' and yelling 'let's go brandon!' cause it's cool.

Which is, literally, dividing and separating.

And I'm all for it.

 

[Anti Federalist]

You know I can name fascist purges without a trip to the library. And I suspect you know I only mentioned 9/11/01 because it happened here.

As long as I've been a part of this..."thing of ours", Islamo-Fascism was never an acceptable theory as to why 9/11 happened.

It's universally been understood as an inside job, to some degree, designed to increase war, damage the US, and usher in global Marxist government.

 

[Anti Federalist]

https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/st...erry-mcauliffe-loss-virginia-benefits-us-all/

 

[Occam's Banana]

Republican Glenn Youngkin WINS [...]

Youngkin didn't win. McAuliffe lost. That's not the same thing.

I'm quite glad that McAuliffe lost. That is indeed good news.

But as far as I can tell, Youngkin is just another standard-issue, garden-variety Republican.

And therein lies the problem ...

"The anti-woke electoral victories are good news. But they won’t get us far unless men like Youngkin are prepared to inflict pain on the institutions that pushed wokeness." -- Sohrab Ahmari​

Unfortunately, Youngkin and men like him aren't going to do any such thing. They are pleased to benefit from the reaction against unhinged progressives, to be sure - but they mistakenly treat that reaction as if it's some kind of endorsement of themselves and their (also objectionable) policies. So they will do nothing to actually strike the root. (And why should they? After all, it helps get them elected, and gives them venues through which to exercise their own power once they've been elected.)

Rather, Republicans and conservatives reliably work to preserve and protect all the institutions and other mechanisms that the Democrats and progressives have created and exploited over the years in order to make such deep inroads into culture and power centers (Exhibit A: the Department of Education). For example, based on what little I have seen from him, Youngkin is an enthusiastic supporter of "public" education.

IOW: Youngkin, et al. may not push the progressive agenda forward - and I suppose that's something, at least - but they'll do nothing to reverse it, either. That's exactly why we're in the mess we're in. It's why conservatism has failed so miserably (except when it comes to "conserving" whatever the progressives were doing a few decades ago).

IOOW: This is not a victory. It is, at best, a brief and limited respite. Again, that's not nothing. But it's not nearly enough, either - and it never will be.

 

[enhanced_deficit]

As long as I've been a part of this..."thing of ours", Islamo-Fascism was never an acceptable theory as to why 9/11 happened.

It's universally been understood as an inside job, to some degree, designed to increase war, damage the US, and usher in global Marxist government.

EM.

Global opinion polls suggest that also but within the U.S., majority of the public "universally" believes that it was an outside job by folks not connected to deep neocons.

 

[CaptUSA]

Yeah, but we also know who McAuliffe is.

NOBODY IN THIS THREAD IS GLAD YOUNGKIN WON. We're just glad McAuliffe lost.

Yep. That's my take. I get a little joy every time an incumbent loses. Especially, a former chairman of the DNC.

 

[acptulsa]

This tells you everything you need to know.
He has also said that Sandra Dang O'Conner was a great SCOTUS justice.


This thread is showing the difference between the sane and the insane/Dem operatives.

A Dem operative? Fucking tool.

JFK.

Vietnam.

Watergate.

Pardon and stagflation.

*Peace between Israel and Egypt.

More debt than all previous administrations combined in the name of Conservatism and Alzheimer's.

Desert Storm.

Leadup to 9/11.

9/11 and the PATRIOT Act.

Massive corporate welfare.

Warp speed and economic sabotage.

Pooped pants for the pope.

What's your oh so enlightened pick?

 

[CaptUSA]

Youngkin didn't win. McAuliffe lost. That's not the same thing.

I'm quite glad that McAuliffe lost. That is indeed good news.

But as far as I can tell, Youngkin is just another standard-issue, garden-variety Republican.

And therein lies the problem ...

"The anti-woke electoral victories are good news. But they won’t get us far unless men like Youngkin are prepared to inflict pain on the institutions that pushed wokeness." -- Sohrab Ahmari​

Unfortunately, Youngkin and men like him aren't going to do any such thing. They are pleased to benefit from the reaction against unhinged progressives, to be sure - but they mistakenly treat that reaction as if it's some kind of endorsement of themselves and their (also objectionable) policies. So they will do nothing to actually strike the root. (And why should they? After all, it helps get them elected, and gives them venues through which to exercise their own power once they've been elected.)

Rather, Republicans and conservatives reliably work to preserve and protect all the institutions and other mechanisms that the Democrats and progressives have created and exploited over the years in order to make such deep inroads into culture and power centers (Exhibit A: the Department of Education). For example, based on what little I have seen from him, Youngkin is an enthusiastic supporter of "public" education.

IOW: Youngkin, et al. may not push the progressive agenda forward - and I suppose that's something, at least - but they'll do nothing to reverse it, either. That's exactly why we're in the mess we're in. It's why conservatism has failed so miserably (except when it comes to "conserving" whatever the progressives were doing a few decades ago).

IOOW: This is not a victory. It is, at best, a brief and limited respite. Again, that's not nothing. But it's not nearly enough, either - and it never will be.

Yep - this ^

It's great to get rid of politicians - if only we didn't have to replace them with other politicians.

 

[Occam's Banana]

Rather, Republicans and conservatives reliably work to preserve and protect all the institutions and other mechanisms that the Democrats and progressives have created and exploited over the years in order to make such deep inroads into culture and power centers (Exhibit A: the Department of Education). For example, based on what little I have seen from him, Youngkin is an enthusiastic supporter of "public" education.

https://twitter.com/JeremyTate41/status/1455918204606365699

 

[Occam's Banana]

https://twitter.com/cher/status/1455729113415651339

 

[acptulsa]

https://twitter.com/cher/status/1455729113415651339

1. If they only have one purpose, why did you list two?

2. What gives the poor's money to the rich faster than corporate welfare and inflation, and why is President Poopy Pants doubling down on both?

 

[Occam's Banana]

Rather, Republicans and conservatives reliably work to preserve and protect all the institutions and other mechanisms that the Democrats and progressives have created and exploited over the years in order to make such deep inroads into culture and power centers (Exhibit A: the Department of Education). For example, based on what little I have seen from him, Youngkin is an enthusiastic supporter of "public" education.

https://twitter.com/jbarro/status/1456072629828337667

 

[Occam's Banana]

 

[acptulsa]

Yeah, more like...

 

[A Son of Liberty]

https://twitter.com/cher/status/1455729113415651339

She's either drunk, or everything she knows about politics she learned from a coloring book.

 

[acptulsa]

She's either drunk, or everything she knows about politics she learned from a coloring book.

No, I think "both" is a distinct possibility. Throw in she hasn't let "THE POOR" within fifty yards of her in fifty years.

 

[A Son of Liberty]

No, I think "both" is a distinct possibility. Throw in she hasn't let "THE POOR" within fifty yards of her in fifty years.

Yep.

She didn't seem to mind it when poor people were giving her money to listen to her awful voice, or to watch her awful acting, enabling her queen-like standard of living.

 

[Occam's Banana]

She's either drunk, or everything she knows about politics she learned from a coloring book.

No, I think "both" is a distinct possibility. Throw in she hasn't let "THE POOR" within fifty yards of her in fifty years.

Yep.

She didn't seem to mind it when poor people were giving her money to listen to her awful voice, or to watch her awful acting, enabling her queen-like standard of living.

But what about the safety of Catholics and Buddhists?

Won't someone please think about the Catholics and Buddhists?

 

[Anti Federalist]

She's either drunk, or everything she knows about politics she learned from a coloring book.

Like too many people today she has the mind of an idiot child.

As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths. Isaiah 3:12

 

[Occam's Banana]

Ron Paul Liberty Report - Red Wave! Who Was Yesterday's Biggest Loser?
The shock votes in yesterday's elections - particularly in Virginia and New Jersey - have upended the Democratic Party juggernaut that has prevailed since the 2020 elections. Who are the real winners and losers from yesterday? Also - Minneapolis says "no" to BLM-inspired police defunding, a Pfizer whistleblower, and the CDC's old switcheroo on vax definition is exposed.
https://odysee.com/@RonPaul:d/red-wave!-who-was-yesterday's-biggest:b