Reported ARG poll numbers in ERROR, spread the word!

[pauladin]

Huntsman pimping the hell out of this poll on his facebook page.

 

[wgadget]

Huntsman pimping the hell out of this poll on his facebook page.

We need to let him in on the bad news, then.

 

[Liberty74]

Huntsman pimping the hell out of this poll on his facebook page.

That's because he is crapping his pants that all 50 people who show up to his little rallies on the side walk were polled.

 

[JJ2]

Anyone can post to his wall without even clicking "Like": http://www.facebook.com/jonhuntsmanjr?sk=wall

 

[ord33]

I just posted: "Too bad the ARG poll made an error in their "Definite" vs. "Probable" voter percentages that skews the entire poll. It is a farce! Take a look for yourself at the bottom of the poll (last category) and let me know how that 97/3 comes out to the percentages they are saying is the overall percentage of the candidates. http://americanresearchgroup.com/pres2012/primary/rep/nh/"

 

[limequat]

Tweet it to PPP, they may call them out.

 

[robert9712000]

I posted the error on john huntsmans facebook ,emailed the error to ppp and left a message on ARG's voice mail

 

[JJ2]

Tweet it to PPP, they may call them out.

Good idea.

 

[Avalon]

Hey, just so you guys know they removed the bottom table from the release. So I looked at the other tables and they seem to match the topline numbers. Was that true before? I didn't save a copy.

 

[JJ2]

Hey, just so you guys know they removed the bottom table from the release. So I looked at the other tables and they seem to match the topline numbers. Was that true before? I didn't save a copy.

Yes, the other tables look the same.

Wow, they changed the "Likely to Vote" to "Preference by Sex" (which they don't even have for the other polls, such as Iowa, SC, and FL), without any admission that they had made any error.

 

[The Gold Standard]

Tweet it to PPP, they may call them out.

Shouldn't have done that. That gave them the idea to do it for their poll too.

 

[jersdream]

HAHAHA they took off likelihood to vote. Such bullsh*t.

 

[PauliticsPolitics]

ARG always = Garbage

 

[ord33]

I have it as a .pdf if anybody wants it. Probably not that important, but if someone needs it with the original information just let me know.

 

[ord33]

Wow...They kept the wording the same on the questions asked part of their poll:

About this Survey -

Survey Sponsor: American Research Group, Inc.

The American Research Group has been conducting surveys of voters since 1985.

Sample Size: 600 completed telephone interviews among a random sample of likely Republican primary voters living in New Hampshire (359 Republicans and 241 undeclared voters (independents)). An "*" in the tables indicates responses of less than 1 /2 of 1 percent.

Sample Dates: January 6-7, 2012

Margin of Error: ± 4 percentage points, 95% of the time, on questions where opinion is evenly split.

Question Wording:

If the 2012 Republican presidential preference primary were being held today between (names rotated) Newt Gingrich, Jon Huntsman, Ron Paul, Rick Perry, Mitt Romney, and Rick Santorum, for whom would you vote?

Do you consider yourself to be a supporter of the Tea Party movement, or not?

Using a scale of 1 to 10, with 1 meaning that you will definitely not vote in the 2012 Republican presidential preference primary and 10 meaning that you will definitely vote in the 2012 Republican presidential preference primary, what number would you give as your chance of voting in the 2012 Republican presidential preference primary?

And don't have anything related to "sex" in their stated questions, yet it somehow replaced how likely they were to vote as one of the categories?

 

[JJ2]

Wow...They kept the wording the same on the questions asked part of their poll:



And don't have anything related to "sex" in their stated questions, yet it somehow replaced how likely they were to vote as one of the categories?

Wow. Great catch, thanks!