Reince Priebus discusses the nomination of Ron Paul. Also says he reads DailyPaul..lol

[coffeewithgames]

Thank you for invading yet another topic with it. Do you see what I meant about invading every topic?

No, because it was a direct response to another forum poster. Did you miss that part?

 

[coffeewithgames]

he has a point, coffeewithgames. Discussing a topic when it is the thread topic or is brought up is one thing, but continuously inserting your personal top peeve into threads about completely different subjects when those topics have been fully discussed, including by you, is getting old.

Yea, and I guess moving threads wasn't old long ago, muting any actual discussions about the failures of a campaign by moving them to "Hot Topics" or "The Vent", closing threads wasn't old, and users running around here cursing up a storm wasn't old long ago? Again, I was responding directly to a user in this thread, it wasn't simply a troll "RP's terrible, Mitt Romney FTW!" posts, perhaps you miss that I write out my thoughts most of the time? The user responded to me, and I responded back...in the thread. That happens here ALL the time, but I guess conversations and discussions aren't really wanted from what I can tell, especially on certain topics.

 

[sailingaway]

Yea, and I guess moving threads wasn't old long ago, muting any actual discussions about the failures of a campaign by moving them to "Hot Topics" or "The Vent", closing threads wasn't old, and users running around here cursing up a storm wasn't old long ago? Again, I was responding directly to a user in this thread, it wasn't simply a troll "RP's terrible, Mitt Romney FTW!" posts, perhaps you miss that I write out my thoughts most of the time? The user responded to me, and I responded back...in the thread. That happens here ALL the time, but I guess conversations and discussions aren't really wanted from what I can tell, especially on certain topics.

the moved thread was a rant, and your ragging on it is also against forum rules, you are supposed to take complaints with mods up in pms or by appeal to Josh and Bryan jointly by pm. You are compounding the problem. I also wasn't the one who did it, but I support it.

 

[brandon]

what happend to coffeewithchess

 

[sailingaway]

what happend to coffeewithchess

permabanned

coffeewithgames can't get over it

 

[coffeewithgames]

permabanned

Without reason. I didn't mention anything about CWC, I'm over it. Have I contacted anybody about it? I didn't see the point of communicating with people that don't want to have discussions, so I let it go. If you don't like what someone says, you can get banned. If people run around here cursing up a storm, +REPPPPPP!!!!!!, and they will be here for ages.

 

[LibertyInJeopardy]

did anyone record the handoff?

Quoting an RNC delegate whom I will keep unnamed because I do not have his permission:

"I was literally standing two feet away when the 6 petitions were handed to the secretary of the convention and Reince Priebus is bald face lying when he claims it never happened. These are people who have no shame and for whom truth means nothing. They are beneath contempt."

It would be good to have this video of his denial and video evidence proving it a lie.

 

[sailingaway]

Without reason. I didn't mention anything about CWC, I'm over it. Have I contacted anybody about it? I didn't see the point of communicating with people that don't want to have discussions, so I let it go. If you don't like what someone says, you can get banned. If people run around here cursing up a storm, +REPPPPPP!!!!!!, and they will be here for ages.

No, you weren't quitting the behavior you were warned against multiple times and you don't actually seem to have learned from it. I didn't ban you either, by the way.

 

[coffeewithgames]

the moved thread was a rant, and your ragging on it is also against forum rules, you are supposed to take complaints with mods up in pms or by appeal to Josh and Bryan jointly by pm. You are compounding the problem. I also wasn't the one who did it, but I support it.

No, I'm talking about MULTIPLE threads that get moved. An interview with Doug Wead about the OFFICIAL campaign and decisions, and things at the RNC...buried.

Ragging on what? What are you even talking about? Considering I can provide links to reasons for posts, and get no responses around here, again you can be banned for simply having a difference of opinion. When I pointed out moving threads, trying to get it out of the spotlight, was like the RNC putting the RP delegates in the nosebleed section, and not following your own rules is like the RNC and changing them as you go, then apparently there is a lot in common. Considering you said, "I support it" doesn't surprise me either.

 

[coffeewithgames]

No, you weren't quitting the behavior you were warned against multiple times and you don't actually seem to have learned from it. I didn't ban you either, by the way.

Show me one time I was warned by a mod/admin about my behavior.

 

[sailingaway]

No, I'm talking about MULTIPLE threads that get moved. An interview with Doug Wead about the OFFICIAL campaign and decisions, and things at the RNC...buried.

Ragging on what? What are you even talking about? Considering I can provide links to reasons for posts, and get no responses around here, again you can be banned for simply having a difference of opinion. When I pointed out moving threads, trying to get it out of the spotlight, was like the RNC putting the RP delegates in the nosebleed section, and not following your own rules is like the RNC and changing them as you go, then apparently there is a lot in common. Considering you said, "I support it" doesn't surprise me either.

'hot topics" exists for topics that are "hot"

topics that start flame wars often are moved there. I understand you feel injured by this, but I don't see how you can say it is not following our own rules.

 

[sailingaway]

Show me one time I was warned by a mod/admin about my behavior.

the moved thread was a rant, and your ragging on it is also against forum rules, you are supposed to take complaints with mods up in pms or by appeal to Josh and Bryan jointly by pm. You are compounding the problem. I also wasn't the one who did it, but I support it.

 

[LibertyInJeopardy]

One of our delegates is going to upload video of them filing the nomination papers over an hour before Roll Call to refute the statement that papers weren't filed in time. Apparently the secretary was unreasonably difficult to find, as was Sununu with the rules committee stuff, but they found her.

Excellent. I was hoping it was recorded.

 

[coffeewithgames]

No, you weren't quitting the behavior you were warned against multiple times and you don't actually seem to have learned from it. I didn't ban you either, by the way.

So, mods can openly lie about RPF members? Or, make statements not backed up with facts? I was never warned "multiple times" for anything, you also claimed I was attacking people. When I asked you for that proof, what did you provide? NONE.

 

[sailingaway]

So, mods can openly lie about RPF members? Or, make statements not backed up with facts? I was never warned "multiple times" for anything, you also claimed I was attacking people. When I asked you for that proof, what did you provide? NONE.

did you even look at my response? How was that not a warning? I am not lying, but I am also not going to bother to research all your posts . And I warn you AGAIN that if you have a problem with mod action you are supposed to appeal it by pm to Josh and Bryan jointly, not fight it out in the forums.

 

[coffeewithgames]

did you even look at my response? How was that not a warning? I am not lying, but I am also not going to bother to research all your posts . And I warn you AGAIN that if you have a problem with mod action you are supposed to appeal it by pm to Josh and Bryan jointly, not fight it out in the forums.

I just checked my account, didn't see any PMs or emails, or -REPs with warnings. So, no multiple warnings there. Am I not looking in the right spot for them? Also, if you go around saying someone was personally attacking other RPF members, you should be able to back that up. No?

 

[sailingaway]

I just checked my account, didn't see any PMs or emails, or -REPs with warnings. So, no multiple warnings there. Am I not looking in the right spot for them? Also, if you go around saying someone was personally attacking other RPF members, you should be able to back that up. No?

A caution in a thread like the one I posted counts.

 

[coffeewithgames]

A caution in a thread like the one I posted counts.

LOL! You didn't caution anything, you said, "he has a point, coffeewithgames. Discussing a topic when it is the thread topic or is brought up is one thing, but continuously inserting your personal top peeve into threads about completely different subjects when those topics have been fully discussed, including by you, is getting old."

To which, I replied how I was responding to another poster in the thread, I believe you have done the very same thing in threads: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...n-Ron-s-forum-split-off&p=4634856#post4634856

But, I guess it's okay for you to do it because you are doing it to defend RP's name? Or, something?

 

[fr33]

This was an interesting topic about how our delegates were cheated but some obsessed fool ruined it.

 

[Bruno]

This was an interesting topic about how our delegates were cheated but some obsessed fool ruined it.

I propose to have a mod move those off-topic posts to a new whine and cheese thread.

Back on topic.