Re: Johnson / OG paulbot got something to say

Bunch of sellouts around here these days.

Be careful now NC; we are in the era of Gary Johnson Libertarianism, where you can do whatever you want as long as don't: hurt, offend, minorly irritate, bother, or look cross-eyed at other people, especially protected classes of people. And name-calling CERTAINLY will not be tolerated.
 
And that quickly I'm reminded me of why I left this shithole to begin with. Enjoy your "inclusive" movement. I'm sure you'll get all those converts acting like that.

I wish the old guard of RP activists could be a little more open to actually growing their own movement instead of waiting for candidates and supporters who align with them on 99% of issues to just show up on their own.

Good luck ladies and germs!
 
Be careful now NC; we are in the era of Gary Johnson Libertarianism, where you can do whatever you want as long as don't: hurt, offend, minorly irritate, bother, or look cross-eyed at other people, especially protected classes of people. And name-calling CERTAINLY will not be tolerated.

Well. I dont know, specs. Somebody's gotta have the fortitude to call a spade a spade around here. I'll be darned if I'm going to stand around cheerleading for Individual Liberty's openly admitted aggressor. And I sure as heck wouldn't do so in Liberty's name. I don't really care if anyone doesn't like to hear the truth. Somebody has to say it.
 
Last edited:
The old Ron Paul wing of the Liberty movement is full of pompous d-bags. Enjoy staying at 1% and making zero impact on the future of our country. It's cool though, you can bitch and moan about how you called it all along without ever having done anything to help. Stay on your sinking ship, asshat!
 
Hey, if GJ actually gets new people to embrace liberty, property rights, etc that's cool. Although he himself doesn't understand or believe in many of the things RP did. I haven't heard anyone say GJ cured my apathy, but I suppose they may be out there.

Weld doesn't embrace liberty at all. He's not good on anything.
 
Hey, if GJ actually gets new people to embrace liberty, property rights, etc that's cool.

Well. Doesn't seem like an open contention that sending men from the government with guns to force Individuals or groups of Individuals to relinquish their right to property is a very practical way to teach people to embrace property rights or liberty. Seems like that philosophy is actually teaching people that property rights and liberty should be rejected fully. That's a communist philosophy. Patently. Of course, the right to property is the principal support for Life and Liberty itself. So, technically, by popularizing a rejection of
Individual Liberty's principal support, he's teaching people to reject Individual Liberty fully. And he's doing so in Liberty, no less.

But wuheva. If someone can explain to me how I'm wrong and that sending men from the government with guns to force Individuals at the end of their barrels to relinquish their right to Individual Liberty's principal support is embracing Liberty, then, by all means, I'm open for correction.

We can set that little thing about illegally transferring power from the people solely to the President aside for the time being. That's something else.
 
Last edited:
The old Ron Paul wing of the Liberty movement is full of pompous d-bags. Enjoy staying at 1% and making zero impact on the future of our country. It's cool though, you can bitch and moan about how you called it all along without ever having done anything to help. Stay on your sinking ship, asshat!

I thought you were leaving.
 
Last edited:
ok so whats the choice then? i wont vote trump or hillary. there is no one else other than johnson with the ability to be on all state ballots. sooo, what am i supposed to do? johnson and weld arent perfect, but it seems like some of you here have no forward thinking. trust me, if rand was an option id vote for him without a doubt. if ron was an option...the same.

so who are you going to vote for? the ones who hate all 3, please tell me your secret candidate that has a real chance of getting into these debates. and i am NOT a traitor to this ron paul thing. fucking hell, i never thought id be classified as such by some of you after god damn 9 years of knowing me here.
 
I'm done trying to reason with asshats. I've been a part of the movement since 2007. If you want to be arrogant toward me you're only proving my point.
 
Johnson will be lucky to get 2% of the vote. After November, this is all going to be over. And we're going to be back to principles.
 
I'm done trying to reason with asshats. I've been a part of the movement since 2007.

Sheeit. I've been humping pavement the old fashoned way since the 80s and before most of you ever even knew who Ron Paul was. Heck, most of you likely weren't even born. 2007. Phht. What the heck is that supposed to mean to me? Heck, I think I even have a sock around here from 07 if it makes you feel better.
 
Last edited:
ok so whats the choice then? i wont vote trump or hillary. there is no one else other than johnson with the ability to be on all state ballots. sooo, what am i supposed to do? johnson and weld arent perfect, but it seems like some of you here have no forward thinking. trust me, if rand was an option id vote for him without a doubt. if ron was an option...the same.

so who are you going to vote for? the ones who hate all 3, please tell me your secret candidate that has a real chance of getting into these debates. and i am NOT a traitor to this ron paul thing. $#@!ing hell, i never thought id be classified as such by some of you after god damn 9 years of knowing me here.
TyrantEagle calling people traitors all the while he supports Trump with a passion the biggest anti-liberty spewing Hitler want to be, tyrant in the history of presidential politics. Ignore em if you must, I like to read his spew as it gives me a hardy laugh. As for NC he supports Castle, which at least is a decent candidate, he feels leaps and bounds above Johnson, personally I feel their about even although Weld is pretty bad, not Trump/Hillary bad but meh. My argument against Castle is he is running for the Constitution party which has a very crappy, non liberty platform and he most likely won't be on my state ballot or many others likely less than half of em. So that pretty much means his votes are pretty much just protest votes which only support a party which I disagree with its platform even though Castle is better than his parties platform.
 
Back
Top