cheapseats
Banned
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2008
- Messages
- 7,502
You sound exactly like Obama and the liberals...
That's a first, I'll grant you that.
You sound exactly like Obama and the liberals...
He's talking about the verifying the that the fence is being built. His whole amendment is about the fence.
Technological advancements ELIMINATING jobs (efficiency) is a whole different ballgame than Illegal Immigrants FILLING AVAILABLE JOBS.
It is a whole different LEAGUE than Illegal Immigrants filling available jobs while RECORD NUMBERS OF AMERICAN UNEMPLOYED collect "unemployment benefits" (taxpayer dough).
No, it isn't.
JUst curious how do you know it is about fence and not about bringing troops home to guard borders (like his father suggested)?
I guess I mean "fence" as in border security whether it's a virtual fence with drones and cameras, people or whatever.
It's not different at all. Technology and illegal immigrants both cost less...
Ah muchas gracias senorata.. whicha waya to Amerika?
If you have social state fence is a MUST.
Beneath contempt.
I'm all for open borders in a welfare free state. I'm as libertarian as anyone else on this issue. In fact I think illegal immigrants are the best because they can't get welfare, and they're off the grid. It's ironic that many people here STRIVE to accomplish that and I daydream about it as well.
What's wrong with the free market and supply and demand? Illegal immigrants live in a truer free market, the black market, than ourselves.
Illegal immigrants aren't eligible for welfare but their kids are, in fact over 50% of illegal immigrant households receive some form of government help. So the cheap labor you like so much isn't as cheap as you think. It's subsidized by tax payers through social welfare programs.
Illegal immigration distorts the free market by artificially increasing the supply of low wage workers.
If the "verify" part is referring to the report stating that the boarder is secure, before issuing more work visas, then that's different and I'm ok with that. I, personally, lean towards a more open/libertarian position and don't like the idea of fences, etc... Granted I don't see the welfare state being reduced in the immediate future, so I think it's probably about as good of a compromise as we are going to get right now. Admitting illegals can't be easily deported (not without a massive expansion of government and civil liberty violations), is a big step for the GOP.
You're right, very well said. The verify part does mean the fence. I listen to every Rand Paul interview and speech.
No, regulations distort the amount of businesses that are built. Regulation caps the amount of businesses and reduces available work. We could have all the work in world available given enough freedom.
So....round em up and ship em off? Not gonna happen. Get rid of welfare? That goes without saying. Welcome to the Ron Paul forums. Our party platform can be located:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarianism
/tongueincheek