Rand Paul to be featured on O'Reilly tonight (4/8)

[JoshLowry]

who was it that got banned that produce all the youtube videos?

All the YouTube videos?

Not sure. Have some worked to gain credibility in order to undermine? Yes. If they show themselves to be disruptive enough, then we ban them from posting here.

It's a simple concept but trolls are sneaky.

I think you and others harping on RPF for moderator abuse or resorting to insults is unwarranted. Dickhole?

FriedChicken and Traditional Con up to bat. No surprises.

 

[torchbearer]

All the YouTube videos?

Not sure. Have some worked to gain credibility in order to undermine? Yes. If they show themselves to be disruptive enough, then we ban them from posting here.

It's a simple concept but trolls are sneaky.

I think you and others harping on RPF for moderator abuse or resorting to insults is unwarranted. Dickhole?

FriedChicken and Traditional Con up to bat. No surprises.

sorry, the mods are part of the just-us system.
I think the guy who was publishing all the videos was Eduardo. only because all the videos seemed to be published by a youtube account with that name in it. apparently there was some personal shit that went on. because I never saw him post anything as devalued as my post, and he provided this site with on the spot video content. this place had it first. now its like a desert.

 

[FriedChicken]

FriedChicken and Traditional Con up to bat. No surprises.

I honestly don't know what that means

Edit: in the spirit of not derailing the thread I'd really appreciate a PM about what that means.

 

[andrew1229649]

I'm not normally like this but honestly, if people don't like the way things are here they can freely leave. This comment is not directed at anyone in particular.

 

[Brett85]

All of the banning is just going to make it harder to promote money bombs for Rand here at this forum in 2016. All of the people who are being banned are those who post in Rand's forum the most often. It's really quite ridiculous.

 

[torchbearer]

I'm not normally like this but honestly, if people don't like the way things are here they can freely leave. This comment is not directed at anyone in particular.

the site requires content. if you get rid of the content providers- then- all you have is a message relay and chat.

 

[andrew1229649]

the site requires content. if you get rid of the content providers- then- all you have is a message relay and chat.

The content is still there and can be easily posted by anyone here. He still has his Youtube page.

 

[Brett85]

I honestly don't know what that means

Edit: in the spirit of not derailing the thread I'd really appreciate a PM about what that means.

It means that the "libertarian" moderators are trying to make this forum as similar to Communist China as possible.

 

[torchbearer]

The content is still there and can be easily posted by anyone here. He still has his Youtube page.

is he keeping it current? was that him that got banned? he isn't the only Eduardo on the planet.

 

[JoshLowry]

Go China!

Spare me with your list of grievances. No really come up with a list of all our censorship and banning of rational members.

 

[VoteRandPaul2016]

This isn't going to end well.

 

[Brett85]

I felt that Abacabb, Confederate, and Spread of Libery were all rational members. I never saw any of them engage in any personal attacks or do anything to suggest that they weren't here to help promote the liberty movement.

 

[andrew1229649]

is he keeping it current? was that him that got banned? he isn't the only Eduardo on the planet.

Send him a message on Youtube and ask.

 

[Brett85]

It's strange that this thread started with someone complaining about members being banned in the past, and then another member was banned after the issue of banning was brought up. Really strange.

 

[PatriotOne]

10 minutes until O'Reilly. Hope someone recaps because the last time I tuned in I was really, really sorry I did.

 

[jtstellar]

i would suggest some changes be made in interest of accountability.. mods who ban people should put up the person banned and the reason and a open thread for discussion whether people agree with the action in a separate board, where mods' acts can be brought under broad daylight, and definitely not always someone else explaining for the person who did the banning where too often the person who made the decision doesn't even bother showing up. you don't want to go the way of dailypaul.

 

[torchbearer]

Send him a message on Youtube and ask.

I got an answer in private.

 

[PatriotOne]

Speaking of Fox News. I got a 6 page letter from The American Conservative Union today titled "Don't Drop Fox News" along with a survey and request for donations. Claims there is a massive attempt to pressure Fox News advertisers to pull their commercials by Media Matters liberals. I'll be filling out the survey but don't think they are going to like the answers.

 

[itshappening]

He's not being featured in the lead-in so I doubt he's appearing.

 

[GOP]

He's not being featured in the lead-in so I doubt he's appearing.

I think Thatcher might have taken his spot...