Rand Paul on CNN speaking truth about Trump...

[LatinsforPaul]

 

[mavtek]

That was really hard for me to pay attention. I find Erin Burnett to be so hot, those legs under that table and that chest! Oh man! I'm not even sure what Rand said.

 

[Dianne]

Rand is actually very foolish doing this. Insulting Trump helps him not a bit. It only helps the republican establishment push Jebbie or Christie to the top. I actually wouldn't be surprised to see Trump taking up for Rand, if Rand had not decided to insult him.

 

[hells_unicorn]

Rand is actually very foolish doing this. Insulting Trump helps him not a bit. It only helps the republican establishment push Jebbie or Christie to the top. I actually wouldn't be surprised to see Trump taking up for Rand, if Rand had not decided to insult him.

You would be disappointed, Trump isn't going to stick up for Rand, and why shouldn't Rand mention that Trump has said some detestable things that would even make Jeb and Christie seem tame by comparison? There is as much chance of Trump helping Rand as there is of Hillary Clinton helping Rand. You seriously can't take note of the MSM lying and not see this Trump dog and pony show for what it actually is.

 

[Dianne]

You would be disappointed, Trump isn't going to stick up for Rand, and why shouldn't Rand mention that Trump has said some detestable things that would even make Jeb and Christie seem tame by comparison? There is as much chance of Trump helping Rand as there is of Hillary Clinton helping Rand. You seriously can't take note of the MSM lying and not see this Trump dog and pony show for what it actually is.

Trump was asked about Rand the other day, and Trump was gentle and agreed with Rand not to sit at the kid table because he was due more respect then that. So why does Rand come out slugging at Trump on CNN today, when he should have been going after Reince Prevous and Butthead, head of the GOP instead? Rand is picking the wrong f'king adversaries.

 

[timosman]

Trump was asked about Rand the other day, and Trump was gentle and agreed with Rand not to sit at the kid table because he was due more respect then that.

That's not what I heard. He was gently putting Rand down basically saying he understands somebody in his position, blah blah blah. You hear what you want to hear, but most people would get an impression Rand is on his way out from Trump.

 

[hells_unicorn]

Trump was asked about Rand the other day, and Trump was gentle and agreed with Rand not to sit at the kid table because he was due more respect then that. So why does Rand come out slugging at Trump on CNN today, when he should have been going after Reince Prevous and Butthead, head of the GOP instead? Rand is picking the wrong f'king adversaries.

Uh, Trump talked about using nukes and killing entire families of suspected terrorists. You want to address that before laying all this crap on me about how allegedly nice Trump was to Rand in one interview where Rand wasn't even present? (he wasn't, for the record, I don't count being dismissive and casually soft-spoken about it as being supportive)

 

[Dianne]

That's not what I heard. He was gently putting Rand down basically saying he understands somebody in his position, blah blah blah. You hear what you want to hear, but most people would get an impression Rand is on his way out from Trump.

Not me, I hear Rand is on his way out from FOX News and the GOP. Why, after getting bitch raped by the RNC, would Rand do their bidding and help to take out their second most hated candidate, Trump? I just don't understand it.

 

[CPUd]

Trump was asked about Rand the other day, and Trump was gentle and agreed with Rand not to sit at the kid table because he was due more respect then that. So why does Rand come out slugging at Trump on CNN today, when he should have been going after Reince Prevous and Butthead, head of the GOP instead? Rand is picking the wrong f'king adversaries.

Rand is going after the RNC, too, for pushing him out of the debate. When Rand went after Trump in the past, everyone else was too scared to have his back. Now that others are stepping up their anti-Trump game, Rand is trying to remind folks he was the first one to do it.

 

[hells_unicorn]

Not me, I hear Rand is on his way out from FOX News and the GOP. Why, after getting bitch raped by the RNC, would Rand do their bidding and help to take out their second most hated candidate, Trump? I just don't understand it.

Trump wants to use nukes and kill families, we don't want to be touching Trump with a 10 ft. pole on matters of general principle, RNC or not.

 

[Dianne]

Rand is going after the RNC, too, for pushing him out of the debate. When Rand went after Trump in the past, everyone else was too scared to have his back. Now that others are stepping up their anti-Trump game, Rand is trying to remind folks he was the first one to do it.

Well it didn't work, because the RNC turned their back on Rand. I would prefer seeing Rand campaigning for the need to have a five party system in the U.S., rather than the republicrat system which now exists. He should be giving the RNC HELL right now.

 

[erowe1]

I don't like how Rand talks about destroying the Republican party like that would be a bad thing.

Am I supposed to like it.

 

[chiefsmurph]

That was really hard for me to pay attention. I find Erin Burnett to be so hot, those legs under that table and that chest! Oh man! I'm not even sure what Rand said.

thats exactly what they want you to think

 

[hells_unicorn]

I don't like how Rand talks about destroying the Republican party like that would be a bad thing.

Am I supposed to like it.

What gives you the impression that Rand is only talking to you? Last time I checked there were a few million people out there registered to vote, some of them even own televisions and computers, amazingly enough.

That was really hard for me to pay attention. I find Erin Burnett to be so hot, those legs under that table and that chest! Oh man! I'm not even sure what Rand said.

 

[erowe1]

What gives you the impression that Rand is only talking to you? Last time I checked there were a few million people out there registered to vote, some of them even own televisions and computers, amazingly enough.

I hope that he doesn't think many of them care about saving the Republican party.

Once again he's making the same mistake in how he attacks Trump. Rand sounds like he's speaking on behalf of the GOP establishment, and he's only bolstering Trump's phony anti-establishment credentials. Those credentials should be Rand's and he's acting like he doesn't want them. Why not blast Trump for being in the wrong party, for being by far the most liberal candidate ever to run for the Republican nomination, for supporting single payer healthcare, for wanting to take away our guns? Rand's point about the buffoonery of Trump's campaign wanting it to be easier for the US to nuke people was great. But when he attacks him for the good of the party, who does he think he's trying to win over to himself? Bush supporters?

 

[CPUd]

I hope that he doesn't think many of them care about saving the Republican party.

Once again he's making the same mistake in how he attacks Trump. Rand sounds like he's speaking on behalf of the GOP establishment, and he's only bolstering Trump's phony anti-establishment credentials. Those credentials should be Rand's and he's acting like he doesn't want them. Why not blast Trump for being in the wrong party, for being by far the most liberal candidate ever to run for the Republican nomination, for supporting single payer healthcare, for wanting to take away our guns? Rand's point about the buffoonery of Trump's campaign wanting it to be easier for the US to nuke people was great. But when he attacks him for the good of the party, who does he think he's trying to win over to himself? Bush supporters?

Rand has a vision of what the party should be. It is essentially the same as his father's (big tent, inclusive), and it is what the party said they needed to do (after the 2012 postmortem) to win this time around. He speaks out against Trump, because Trump is moving people in the opposite direction of that vision. Rand speaks out against party leadership, because they also are moving people away from that vision.

 

[FriedChicken]

So Dianne... What did he actually say that you disagree with?
I'm perplexed why anyone in the U.S.would find any of his statements controversial.

 

[hells_unicorn]

I hope that he doesn't think many of them care about saving the Republican party.

Once again he's making the same mistake in how he attacks Trump. Rand sounds like he's speaking on behalf of the GOP establishment, and he's only bolstering Trump's phony anti-establishment credentials. Those credentials should be Rand's and he's acting like he doesn't want them. Why not blast Trump for being in the wrong party, for being by far the most liberal candidate ever to run for the Republican nomination, for supporting single payer healthcare, for wanting to take away our guns? Rand's point about the buffoonery of Trump's campaign wanting it to be easier for the US to nuke people was great. But when he attacks him for the good of the party, who does he think he's trying to win over to himself? Bush supporters?

Uh, Rand has been doing all of this, have you been paying attention? You literally can not say all of this stuff in a singular interview, and your ignorance of him doing this is actually a testament to how media disinformation can poison Rand's own team against him. What would you prefer him do? Blurt out "The GOP sucks, and by logical deduction I suck for being in it, let's smoke a big blunt and hooray Libertarianism" and drone on about the Bush family being a bunch of inbred descendants of King George III?

Seriously, there's no pleasing you, and I think Rand would do well to not even try.

 

[CPUd]

Uh, Rand has been doing all of this, have you been paying attention? You literally can not say all of this stuff in a singular interview, and your ignorance of him doing this is actually a testament to how media disinformation can poison Rand's own team against him. What would you prefer him do? Blurt out "The GOP sucks, and by logical deduction I suck for being in it, let's smoke a big blunt and hooray Libertarianism" and drone on about the Bush family being a bunch of inbred descendants of King George III?

Seriously, there's no pleasing you, and I think Rand would do well to not even try.

 

[hells_unicorn]

I don't see a blunt in Rand's mouth, you lose.