Wise men choose their battles. Together with his past comments about the Civil Rights Act, if he would have taken the opposite stance on this flag, just imagine the soundbytes that would be spouted all over the airways.
He did the wise thing.
You really wonder how long this pushing can go? At some point, the rubber band breaks and snaps back violently.
Once again to be on the right side of politics Rand chooses to be on the wrong side of truth. There were other things he could have said or at least qualified that it's a symbol "to some". But no. A little lie here, a little lie there. The Lord doesn't care about your campaign. Whether you win or lose is up to him anyway. Good intentions are not an excuse for lying.
But whatevs, clearly as has been shown on this thread and others in the past I am in the minority on this lying to get ahead strategy.
EBay to ban sale of Confederate flag merchandise
http://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...0b6dae-19c9-11e5-bed8-1093ee58dad0_story.html
It is getting this ridiculous that clearly they would have destroyed Rand otherwise.
Defending the right to use a symbol that makes most people think you are unintelligent and racist. Why aren't hindu's defending the nazi symbol? Just retire it already.
I guess I see now that there is a strong bond people have with the symbol (and I know for the most part that's not a racist thing) that I can't relate with. More evidence, to me, that one should not allow personal identity to be defined by a symbol, because symbols change. Same philosophy that leads me to not have tattoos I guess.
I see the reasonable arguments on both sides, and I do think it's a pain and a shame that communication among people isn't better, and so symbols have to be retired. Tea Party is a good example. It sucks! But we just have to adapt.
You really think Rand lied about this? Where is the lie?
Lol at me listening to a Confederate state tell me the war was about "states rights" when the South felt it was there right to secede over slavery because it was a states rights issue. Ok Confederate
Wasn't it though?
The SCOTUS ruled in Dred Scott that slaves were property.
The FedGov was moving to "take" property in violation of the Fifth Amendment.
To be honest, I think there will be no further resistance, and it will all break down and start over.
Fine, how about the confusing U.S flag? They won't touch that because they are politicians, you know it and I know it. And that's fine, I don't expect them to. But I'm not going to get out my pom poms and start cheering over some dumb statements they put out.You have to be seriously biased to interpret this that way.
Tom Davis and Rand Paul aren't going PC - they are stating the true, correct position on the matter. Don't defend symbols that cause confusion. Seek clarity and unity.
Also banned at Sears, though I have never seen confederate merchandise at Sears.
It wouldn't surprise me if buying this stuff will put you on some kind of government "list". Makes me want to run out and buy a confederate flag.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/22/politics/confederate-flag-walmart-south-carolina/
TOTAL BLOWBACK!
These guys must be really happy right now...
http://www.rebelstore.com/confederateflags.html
Please allow a few extra days for delivery until we can get caught up - We appreciate your support during this terribly sad time while the intolerant and the mean spirited uneducated attack our proud southern heritage with a vengeance.
They sell a damn nice 3'x5' flag for $9. Sounds very heavy duty and well made.
-t
Lol at me listening to a Confederate state tell me the war was about "states rights" when the South felt it was there right to secede over slavery because it was a states rights issue. Ok Confederate