itshappening
Banned
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2007
- Messages
- 12,355
he can't run for both, at least in kentucky.
Ron could run for both house and president because texas law allowed it.
Maybe we can get Kentucky to pass a law allowing him to run for both?
he can't run for both, at least in kentucky.
Ron could run for both house and president because texas law allowed it.
he can't run for both, at least in kentucky.
Ron could run for both house and president because texas law allowed it.
Maybe we can get Kentucky to pass a law allowing him to run for both?
Josh Josh josh...., I love you.
his senate term won't coincide with another presidential election until 2028, which means he could run for president in 2020 or 2024 without having to worry about it.
I'm all about Rand 2016 - but if he doesn't have a realistic chance at winning maybe it would be best for him to wait? How shitty would it be for him to run and not win any state, and lose his Senate seat? He's building a lot of political capital and it would suck to blow it on an unwinnable race. I guess I'm just being a bit of a contrarian.
so who for VP...
he can't run for both, at least in kentucky.
Ron could run for both house and president because texas law allowed it.
Type in Randpaulforums.com
It leads you here to Ronpaulforums![]()
Josh Josh josh...., I love you.
He won't lose his Senate seat. Remember that Rand is supporting McConnell's reelection bid. This pretty much ensures that the KY GOP will not endorse a primary challenger to Rand's seat. KY Senate primaries are in May I believe. So Rand can test out the presidential waters and if he cannot make any headway he has plenty of time to defend his Senate seat.
Realistically, if Rand can't get a "ticket out of Iowa" there is little reason for him to continue past SC. He can drop out, and focus on his Senate seat and the seats of others.
Actually it was necessary. He made a promise during his Senate campaign and he had to keep that promise. Not to mention, he now can't be accused of being the reason Obama got reelected.I told people that they needed to let his endorsement play out and get off his case. I've also been critical of that endorsement because I thought it was completely unnecessary.
The "Establishment" isn't monolothic.If the establishment backs him, I won't vote for him, because I'll know he was compromised.
Beware Santorum
The "Establishment" isn't monolothic.
This. If 2016 doesn't pan out, he can pull out and take that groundwork laid to try again in 2020, hopefully increasing his support in the process--just as Ron did from 2008 to 2012. More name recognition and political capital for Rand should also help any like minded candidates running down ticket between now and then...
Rand Paul / Jim Demint
Rand Paul / Tom Davis
Rand Paul / Judge Nap
of those I think Paul / Demint has the most "electability"