Queeer Surgeon Admits Performing Transsexual Surgeries on Young Children

Joined
Aug 31, 2007
Messages
117,577
Surgeon Admits Performing Transsexual Surgeries on Young Children

https://www.breitbart.com/health/20...ming-transsexual-surgeries-on-young-children/

NEIL MUNRO 10 Jul 2023

A pro-transgender university surgeon says he is performing irreversible sex surgeries on pre-pubescent children who have had no experiences of sexual feelings and little ability to consent or accomplish the required post-surgical procedures.

“It’s a very complicated issue,” Dr. Blair Peters, a Canadian-trained “queeer” surgeon at Oregon Health & Science University, told a friendly interviewer. “But I think definitely something that we’re going to learn a lot more about in the next five to 10 years as we’re doing just increasing numbers of these cases,” Blair said in the now-archived video.

Getting consent and cooperation from the pre-sexual children is also a problem, Blair acknowledged:

It’s challenging because there’s this question of ‘How does that factor into consent?’ when you’re consenting someone for pubertal suppression, and there likely is some effect on downstage genital surgery, but you don’t know if an individual is going to desire genital surgery in the future or not.

And then it’s also hard to have a conversation with someone that maybe hasn’t went through puberty or ever engaged in sexual activity. It’s a really tricky thing … more often than not, there’s been almost no genital engagement in terms of self-stimulation or masturbation. So then trying to assess things like erogenous outcomes after a surgery when someone’s never had an erogenous experience is incredibly difficult because they don’t really have a baseline to compare it to.


https://twitter.com/i/status/1677064109995757568



The issue is especially difficult for young boys because they are expected to repeatedly use a painful wand to prevent their male body from closing up their just-created “vaginal” canal, Peters noted:

And then, you know, post-operative care, anyone knows that seeing the post-op or vaginal classification is really intense and we’re kind of asking someone that is younger and hasn’t really engaged or done much with their genitalia, to all of a sudden do this like really aggressive relaxation for dilation, and it’s just a huge ask. So we’re finding that to be a barrier, almost more so than [surgery].

Many of these medical problems are mentioned in accounts by young people who go through the surgeries, such as “Jazz” Jennings.

The surgeons know little about the long-term outcomes of the experimental surgery on children, according to Blair, who describes himself as a “queeer” surgeon:

You know, we’ve maybe done a couple, a handful, of pubertily suppressed adolescents as a field and no one’s published on it yet. OHSU is, we’re just putting our first series [of studies] together as we’re kind of learning and figuring out what works.

The frank admissions are a problem for the transgender industry and the insurance firms that cover lawsuits but also for President Joe Biden and the many Democrats in D.C. who are trying to shift progressives’ attention from policy failures on poverty, economics, and war, toward the emotional concept of needy “trans kids.”

“The reason they’re playing up the trans issue is to basically signal to their base, that [Biden] is the boldest candidate they’re gonna get, and they don’t want to lose voters to the Green Party,” said Terry Schilling, the president of American Principles Project:

The 2020 election was actually very close the terms of the Electoral College — it’s like 43,000 votes and you shift votes he loses. A Green Party candidate on the ballot in Wisconsin, Arizona, Georgia, in North Carolina, and will basically guarantee he loses if he doesn’t solidify the base.

The GOP has a chance to win more suburban moms by showcasing testimonies about the horrifying damage done to kids, Schilling told Breitbart News:

Suburban women, they’re with us on banning surgeries for minors, but they don’t believe it’s happening. They’re like, “Oh, yeah, but this isn’t really happening that much.” So the next Republican nominee, he’s got to talk a lot about this and bring out the transitioners. Like you almost want a “Detransitioners for Trump” coalition in order to get this out there.

Peters’ admissions drew much criticism online.

“This interview is mind-boggling,” said a tweet by 4thWaveNow, a group that opposes the transsexual ideology’s demand that Americans must submit to the cross-sex claims by men. The statement continued:

Gender surgeon Blair Peters admits how much he doesn’t know about outcomes (e.g. sexual function) for puberty-blocked males he operates on; we’ll “know more” in 5 to 10 years after more teens undergo genital surgeries.

https://twitter.com/4th_WaveNow/status/1677999679496232962



https://twitter.com/4th_WaveNow/status/1678065148936765440



“For an entire year, the mainstream media said that “gender-affirming” doctors were not performing genital surgeries on children,” tweeted Christopher Rufo. “This was always a lie—and now they’re admitting it in the open … There’s no other way to say it: they’re castrating kids in the name of ‘gender-affirming care.'”

“In any sane society this video would be used as evidence in Blair Peters’s trial for crimes against humanity,” tweeted lawyer Dan Minucci.

Polls show the public is increasingly opposed to the transexual agenda, especially the medical sector’s intensive marketing of transgenderism to kids:

https://twitter.com/Theo_TJ_Jordan/status/1677847355276820480



There is a growing pushback by professionals and media against the progressive-backed profitable business of sex surgery on children and teenagers.

https://twitter.com/TransJusticeOrg/status/166156714470064128

 
Last edited:
There was a time in the US when a few thousand person mob would have immediately formed outside this guy's home or hospital.

Maybe the 1950s ?

Doesn't seem like it was that long ago.
 
Hard to believe there was a time not so long ago where the public was enraged by Jack Kevorkian providing assistance to elderly people who wanted to end their lives.

But now, the public turns a blind eye to these kinds of monsters. No child can consent to this. Any parent that allows these people anywhere near their children should be charged with child abuse. What to do with the evil "doctors" performing these manglings?? Hard to find a punishment too extreme.
 
Hard to believe there was a time not so long ago where the public was enraged by Jack Kevorkian providing assistance to elderly people who wanted to end their lives.

But now, the public turns a blind eye to these kinds of monsters. No child can consent to this. Any parent that allows these people anywhere near their children should be charged with child abuse. What to do with the evil "doctors" performing these manglings?? Hard to find a punishment too extreme.

Monster...butcher of children.

But because he has a gay, lisping voice and cute purple clown hair, nobody sees he's John Wayne Gacy in a doctor's smock.

Christ help us.
 
Monster...butcher of children.

But because he has a gay, lisping voice and cute purple clown hair, nobody sees he's John Wayne Gacy in a doctor's smock.

Christ help us.

I'm not a violent man, but this makes me want to find this monster and teach it a lesson. But that's just what they want. Indeed, Christ help us.
 
[MENTION=3169]Anti Federalist[/MENTION], I listened to the Twitter video. I didn't hear where he admitted to performing gender surgeries on young children. What I did hear is that when young children are put on puberty suppressants, that makes them less (the boys anyway) viable for gender affirming surgery when they get older. Basically, they surgeons need a large enough penis to convert it to a fake vagina. (Sorry for being explicit, but it is what it is). That's already led to at least one well documented death of a 16 year old trans teen.

https://www.sportskeeda.com/health-...-dies-vaginoplasty-surgery-goes-awfully-wrong

The paper begins by saying that the absence of a vagina can negatively affect the sexual quality of life of transgender women and explains that multiple surgical procedures have been described for vaginal reconstruction in these patients.

The patient was described as a healthy 16-year-old who could not undergo standard vaginoplasty.

The patient, who had undeveloped genitals as a result of early puberty suppression caused by taking puberty-suppressing hormones, underwent gender reassignment surgery. The patient reported feeling much better after the operation and having fewer behavioral problems.

Within 24 hours of having a vaginoplasty, the patient started showing major complications. Necrotising fasciitis was confirmed in the days after the surgery.

Despite large doses of intravenous antibiotics and repeated surgical debridement (the removal of dead or infected tissue), the patient went into multiple organ failure and died.

Why is this important to note? Because what's being pushed in the U.S. as the best standard of care for minors with gender identity dysphoria is potentially deadly for them even if they stick with being transgender into adulthood.

This is really brought home by this debate between conservative transgender YouTuber Blair White, and leftwing (former Ron Paul supporter believe it or not) YouTuber "Destiny." Blair got Destiny to agree that gender surgeries, including mastectomies, for minors is a bad idea because a significant number of them change their mind later and there certainly seems to be social contagion going on. But Blair made the point that puberty blockers are likely a bad idea because it actually makes later vaginoplasty dangerous.

 
[MENTION=3169]Anti Federalist[/MENTION], I listened to the Twitter video. I didn't hear where he admitted to performing gender surgeries on young children.

It was the first 1:20 twatter clip posted.

He notes numerous times how "we" are performing these surgeries when the patient victim is not old enough to have grown enough skin to build a franken-penis.
[MENTION=849]jmdrake[/MENTION]

I'm not trying to pick a fight here, I'll address your other points when I get a little more time.

But I want establish the fact that, yes, indeed, Peters is admitting to performing genital mutilation surgeries on pre-pubescent children.
 
Last edited:
It was the first 1:20 $#@!ter clip posted.

He notes numerous times how "we" are performing these surgeries when the patient victim is not old enough to have grown enough skin to build a franken-penis.

Yeah....I watched it again. That's not what he's saying. The issue isn't that the patient victim isn't old enough. The issue is that he's been "puberty suppressed." The pee-pee didn't grow like it normally would have so there's not enough tissue to do the surgery "right." It doesn't matter the age.

Now on the one hand that's "not so bad" because the surgeries aren't being done on pre-adolescents. On the other hand it is bad because puberty blockers for trans teens is the current battleground. Few people who support "gender affirming care" will come out and say they support genital surgery for a 10 year old. But most would say they support puberty blockers for 10 year olds, when it's the puberty blockers themselves that make the later vaginoplasty surgery riskier. So all gender affirming care for minors, surgery or puberty blockers, needs to be banned.
 
I'm not a violent man, but this makes me want to find this monster and teach it a lesson. But that's just what they want. Indeed, Christ help us.

Yes, because they think that, use of force, will finally turn the tide of public opinion and lock sane people out of this debate forever, by lashing out and shutting these demons down with physical force.

They already have the law on their side, in many western nations you'll go to prison for upsetting a weirdosexual.

But they are playing a very dangerous game, running around in a powder magazine with a lit road flare.

The day may come where nobody gives a shit anymore, when the people have had enough of their perversions.

The last time that happened was Europe, around 1939 or so.
 
It was the first 1:20 $#@!ter clip posted.

He notes numerous times how "we" are performing these surgeries when the patient victim is not old enough to have grown enough skin to build a franken-penis.
[MENTION=849]jmdrake[/MENTION]

I'm not trying to pick a fight here, I'll address your other points when I get a little more time.

But I want establish the fact that, yes, indeed, Peters is admitting to performing genital mutilation surgeries on pre-pubescent children.

I went and did a transcript of the entire 1:20m video. You're welcome.

What's been going on with puberty blockers for gender dysphoria is that puberty that's happening normally is halted.


0:00 One thing that is new is genital surgery for someone who has undergone pubertal suppression.
0:07 Ummm..not so much an issue in someone who was assigned female at birth anatomy and has to undergo a phaloplasty because we are creating something with free tissue transfer of flap anyway...
0:19 But a much bigger issue for someone undergoing a penile inversion vaginoplasty.
0:25 Ummm...because we use all of that tissue to create the vulva as well lining the internal vaginal canal.
0:31 And as a specialty, those of us who do a very high volume of gender affirming surgery, we maybe had done maybe a couple or a handful of pre pubertally suppressed adolescents as a field and no ones published on it yet.
0:46 Ummm...Ohsq is just putting its first series together, we're kind of learning and figuring out what works.
0:52 But it's really changing things because, you don't have enough tissue to line the vaginal canals so you either have to take a skin gRaft or take skin from elsewhere or use some artificial products.
1:07 The way that we're dealing with it is by using a robot.
1:10 And we're basically performing inter-abdominal components of the surgery.
1:14 So we're using peritoneum which is the inner lining of the abdomen to line most of the vaginal canal.

He never says he's doing surgeries on "pre-pubescent children." He's doing surgeries on pre pubertally suppressed adolescents." It's not that they are too young to have grown the genital tissue. It's that they were chemically suppressed from going in to full puberty. Now he does admit doing surgeries on adolescents and that's bad in and of itself. The movie #WhatIsAWoman explains this. Puberty suppressing drugs have been around for a while because sometimes puberty starts too early and that can be a problem.

See: https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/articles/7060-adolescent-development
If puberty is happening early (before age 8 for girls and adolescents AFAB and before age 9 for boys and adolescents AMAB) or late (after age 14 for girls and adolescents AFAB and after age 15 for boys and adolescents AMAB), see your pediatrician or an adolescent medicine doctor. They can help manage and treat this problem of puberty. Ignoring these problems can have an impact on bone development and growth.​

I hope that clears this up. Not trying to be argumentative, just want to make sure we stay accurate. Knowledge is power. The puberty blockers themselves are a problem.
 
Man, the whole damned topic is a problem. Think this goes WAY deeper than the procedures used.

Agreed. A mental health issue is being treated as a physical issue. And I can tell you exactly how this happened. There are people who actually born physically intergender. But their issue has been conflated with those who have perfectly fine bodies but have a mental health condition. If your issue is in your mind, treating the body is never the right solution. I've posted videos of Walt Heyer on this forum multiple times but they mostly get ignored for some reason.

 
I hope that clears this up. Not trying to be argumentative, just want to make sure we stay accurate. Knowledge is power. The puberty blockers themselves are a problem.

I appreciate it and I'm not trying be argumentative either, I agree, we need to have our facts 100 correct, that's why I was asking.

Because this is starting to move into life or death territory.
 
“For an entire year, the mainstream media said that “gender-affirming” doctors were not performing genital surgeries on children,” tweeted Christopher Rufo. “This was always a lie—and now they’re admitting it in the open … There’s no other way to say it: they’re castrating kids in the name of ‘gender-affirming care.'”

//

https://twitter.com/robkhenderson/status/1404374397868199938
ucBfuaR.png
 
I appreciate it and I'm not trying be argumentative either, I agree, we need to have our facts 100 correct, that's why I was asking.

Because this is starting to move into life or death territory.

Bolded for emphasis! Yes there are people dying from this so called care. And transwomen in women's sports is dangerous as well. Falon Fox could have killed someone. So the irony is that the conservative straight male patriarchy once again finds itself needed to protect people that don't realize they need protecting. It''s insane when you think about it. But all of this is justified under the banner of suicide prevention. "I'd rather have a live daughter than a dead son." There's no proof that gender affirming care prevents suicide but their is proof that it can create infection and death.
 
Agreed. A mental health issue is being treated as a physical issue. And I can tell you exactly how this happened. There are people who actually born physically intergender. But their issue has been conflated with those who have perfectly fine bodies but have a mental health condition. If your issue is in your mind, treating the body is never the right solution. I've posted videos of Walt Heyer on this forum multiple times but they mostly get ignored for some reason.
...

From a scientific perspective, it is a nuanced situation, that has been hopelessly polluted with politics, almost exclusively created by Marxists to feed their victimhood scam, and pushed by the Malthusian elite who benefit from the scam.

And as in your video, there are real world examples too numerous to list of how the surgeries and treatments often go horribly wrong. The "bottom" surgeries simply do not work, unless amputation alone is the goal. Along with the massive medical complications, they will never be real, they will never pass for real, they will never fool anyone. They will not become "real" biological members of the opposite sex.

The concept of "trans" itself isn't a new one. It has been addressed in history as cross-dressing, and when combined with someone who can "pass" as the opposite sex, it was essentially "trans". There are a few people who are born with more characteristics and mannerisms of the opposite sex, so much so that they are mistaken for the opposite sex. That has always been the case. But there is no surgery or treatment that will make them real members of the opposite sex. "Trans" is simply a label for such a person who lives as the opposite sex without many people knowing.

What is new is the Marxist political victim agenda and the idea that expands these simple facts to ludicrous extremes, and attempts to apply them when they don't apply at all. Instead of being "born that way", anyone can now change sex, simply on a whim, mental problem, or insane medical recommendation. Then you have the medical industrial complex which profits, and the "Doctors" with a god complex.

This is not new. This doctor is following in the failed footsteps of the past. No doubt some of these doctors today believe that medication and surgery has advanced enough that they can make the “Theory of Gender Neutrality” true. Just like the "real communism has never been tried" excuse, they keep pushing their crackpot hypothesis in the face of continual failure.

John Money was a psychologist at Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland who was gaining fame as a pioneer in the field of sexual development and gender identity based on his research on intersex patients. Money was a supporter of the “Theory of Gender Neutrality” and believed that gender identity was a result of social learning and could be changed through behavioral intervention. After seeing his interview on TV in February 1967, the Reimers took Bruce to see Money. Money and his team persuaded the Reimers to believe that sex reassignment surgery was the best option for Bruce.
...
https://unbelievable-facts.com/2017/04/david-reimer.html
 
Pink-haired Portland surgeon who performs sex-change surgery on trans CHILDREN admits they face lifetime of infertility, incontinence and sexual dissatisfaction, in now-deleted video

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...-drawbacks-genital-ops-trans-adolescents.html

14 July 2023

A surgeon dubbed Dr Frankenstein has candidly revealed the downsides of performing genital re-shaping surgeries on transgender children and adults, in a video which has since been deleted.

In the video, Dr Blair Peters, a self-described '***** surgeon' with 'he/they' pronouns, pink hair and a 'passion' for genital surgeries, says patients face fertility, sexual pleasure and other lifelong post-op complications.

Perhaps more concerning is how Dr Peters — who works at one of America's most progressive hospitals — presents his procedures, some of which involve robotics, as experimental.

He says he's 'figuring out what works' and that his team will know more in the next 'five-to-10 years.'

Surgically altering male and female genitals to match those of the opposite sex, or simply removing patients' privates altogether, are widely understood to be tough and problematic procedures.

Advocates of gender-affirming care, as it is known, say they're rare but vital for some trans people. Critics say they should be banned, especially for kids, and that patients need counselling, not cutting.

Dr Peters, a highly-rated plastic surgeon at Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU), made the admissions in a 37-minute interview with Dr Brianna Durand, of Empower Physiotherapy in Seattle.

The original video post from last year appears to have been deleted, but then retrieved from an archive and shared recently on social media. Viewers called the procedures 'evil' and compared them to Nazi-era experiments.

The conservative scholar Christopher Rufo likened Dr Peters to another clinician, the fictional experimenter who builds a monster from body parts in Mary Shelley's 1818 novel, Frankenstein.

OHSU, Dr Peters, and Dr Durand did not answer our requests for comment. OHSU's gender clinic is well regarded among trans patients; wait times for some procedures stretch to as long as two years.

In the video, Dr Peters describes advances being made in phalloplasties and vaginoplasties, including by using a robot controlled by a second surgeon to build a 'neo-vagina' from penis and scrotum tissue.

He also describes wholesale genital removals for non-binary patients, an increasingly popular procedure known as 'nullification.'

Controversially, he addresses the 'handful of puberty-suppressed adolescents' undergoing genital surgeries at OHSU — referring to minors who have taken puberty blockers to delay their growth spurt.

With those boy-to-girl transitioners, he said, surgeons 'don't have enough tissue' to build the neo-vagina and must graft skin from elsewhere.

'We're kind of learning and figuring out what works,' said Dr Peters.

Patients frequently have problems after surgery, added the doctor.

They can suffer 'rectal injury and urinary incompetence,' he said. Others struggle to achieve 'sexual satisfaction' from altered body parts and have worse chances of 'future childbearing.'

Some have a 'really demanding post-operative care process,' he added.

Pretty much every male-to-female genital surgery recipient sees their neo-vagina canal shorten over time, he said.

'We've seen patients coming back even 20-plus years out from a vaginoplasty that have something happened in their life, that they just don't dilate, and aren't having sex for a year, and they will lose a lot of a lot of depth,' said Dr Peters.

Dr Peters said his techniques and success rates were improving as ever more Americans — both young and old — opted for genital surgery, but that there was still much to learn on this new frontier of medicine.

'We're going to learn a lot more about it in the next five to 10 years as we're doing just increasing numbers of these cases,' he said.

Dr Peters and other advocates of trans medicine present the surgeries as a trade-off, acknowledging the substantial drawbacks, but saying they're vital for those with serious discomfort with their own body.

Even so, they are rare within the transgender community.

Of the estimated 1.6 million trans and non-binary Americans aged 13 and above, only 31 percent take cross-sex hormones and 16 percent opt for surgery, according to research by the Washington Post and KFF, a health charity.

Most surgeries are breast removals for female-to-male transitioners.

Genital surgery on children is very rare and massively controversial. Even the World Professional Association for Transgender Health, which advocates for gender-affirming care globally, says procedures should not be attempted on children.

In the US, Republicans have sought to ban puberty blockers, hormones, or surgeries for minors in about 20 states this year. Sweden, Finland, the UK, and other European countries have restricted or halted trans care for kids.

Dr Peters and OHSU have faced criticism for their progressive approach in the past.

Last year, Dr Peters faced a backlash for a since-deleted tweet remarking on having performed breast-removal surgeries on three young adults and adolescents in a single day.

Another OHSU clinician, Dr Nicholas Gideonse, controversially became the first US professional to help terminally ill Americans travel from out-of-state to get their hands on a deadly cocktail of drugs in Oregon to end their lives.

73224205-12299393-image-a-14_1689355873738.jpg
 
Back
Top