QE4 Started & Nobody Noticed

Joined
Mar 6, 2014
Messages
18,553
The Fed has printed $326 billion since September 11, 2019.

g22Qwk5.png


This amounts to a monthly increase of $108 billion. For comparison, QE3 at its height was 'only' $85 billion per month.

There are two components to this new QE: repo operations (essentially lending against collateral, like the ECB does) and outright asset purchases (like the Fed did during previous QE rounds). Three months ago, the repo market blew up, with interest rates spiking to extraordinary highs. What exactly caused this is still unknown, but it indicates severe stress in the financial system (i.e. someone couldn't pay their debts). The Fed responded first by offering short term repos, then longer term repos, then it restarted the asset purchase program, promising to buy $60 billion per month through at least March 2020. Of course, this is in addition to the Fed lowering the funds rate several times last year, after they realized that this economy will implode if rates return to even a small fraction of what was once considered normal.

Had the Fed not taken these actions, we'd likely be a recession right now.

If they don't ease further in the near future, it's likely that we'll soon be in a recession.

What's really worrying, however, is not so much a recession, as the prospect of the Fed easing in perpetuity to prevent one.

 
The event which caused the Fed to lose their minds and suddenly restart QE was the breaking of the normal short term debt markets.

It started in repo markets, with something called asset backed commercial paper:

0fKa2gS.png


^^^not normal

The ABS market is about lending to lower quality borrowers against collateral.

Someone needed money, and the guys with the money said "no thanks," even at 5x the normal rate.

Why? Because the collateral being offered was highly questionable, to the point that lenders wouldn't take it at any price.

This is EXACTLY the same thing that happened in 2007.

Back then, the assets backing the asset backed commercial paper market were, ultimately, subprime mortgages.

This time, we don't know what it is, but my guess is that it's very shitty corporate junk bonds.

...which would include "investment grade" trash that the ratings agencies refuse to downgrade.

After failing in the normal repo markets, whichever shitbanks were involved desperately sought cash wherever they could get it:

skPiCPD.png


This shows the federal funds rate (the rate at which US banks lend to one another) exceeding the Fed's target.

This should pretty much never happen, because the Fed has a giant printing press and is committed to suppressing rates.

Yet, interbank lending rates broke the Fed's target as repo rates were exploding into the stratosphere.

This represents desperate debtors seeking cash to pay their liabilities.

They couldn't get the money in repo, so they tried to get it in federal funds.

And then, when they couldn't get what they needed in federal funds, they went overseas:

VutCxMr.png


This is LIBOR, which reflects the cost of borrowing dollars outside the US.

As you can see, it shows the same rate spike as all the other charts.

This was a massive event.

And that's why the Fed went full retard three months ago.

This was not an isolated event; this reflects a massive overhang of bad debt which can only be serviced with the help of the Fed.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: PAF
Hey now! Don't you know there's an IMPEACHMENT (read "dog and pony show") going on and that the fate of the entire civilized world likely hangs in the balance? Trivial stuff like QE4 can wait until after we save the world from that.
 
Hey now! Don't you know there's an IMPEACHMENT (read "dog and pony show") going on and that the fate of the entire civilized world likely hangs in the balance? Trivial stuff like QE4 can wait until after we save the world from that.

Market actors are determining the fate of the world (within the constraints imposed by jackass politicians).

Meanwhile, those jackass politicians, who ultimately caused 100% of the problem, fight over who will get the blame.

So, same ol same ol...

P.S. Really, they should be be fighting over getting out of dodge; whichever party's in power when this blows is done.
 
Last edited:
As to where this is all heading:

Liquidation, i.e. the reallocation of presently misallocated resources, is the only solution, but this is politically impossible, as the Fed's only true mandate is to reelect politicians, and politicians who preside over depressions don't get reelected. So, as always, the Fed is trying to provide a "soft landing," i.e. print enough to allow a tad of liquidation (i.e. future growth), but without serious unemployment (= lost elections). But they always fail, because what they're trying to do (control, in a rational way, the most important price in an immensely complex market economy) is impossible. All the Fed can do is print so much that the current debt problem is delayed., or print somewhat less, and then react to the recession by printing that larger amount anyway. Anyway, recession or not, Fed reacting quickly enough or not to present stresses, the long-term situation is that the Fed is going to have to either allow total liquidation (politically impossible - see above), or go absolutely apeshit with money printing, to the point that last episode's QE will be not noticeable on a chart. And have no doubt; the Fed can and, if politically necessary, will, monetize every fucking dollar denominated liability on planet Earth. Hyperinflation is preferable, politically, to liquidation.
 
only liberals who hate America want to complain about so called "QE", our economy is booming and there's nothing you can do about it.

DOW is up, 401Ks are up, people are getting tax cuts, job numbers are up, and all liberals can do is whine whine whine and cry like babies because they can't stand that a reality tv show host beat a woman who wanted to be President since she was a kid. Shame.
 
As to where this is all heading:

Liquidation, i.e. the reallocation of presently misallocated resources, is the only solution, but this is politically impossible, as the Fed's only true mandate is to reelect politicians, and politicians who preside over depressions don't get reelected. So, as always, the Fed is trying to provide a "soft landing," i.e. print enough to allow a tad of liquidation (i.e. future growth), but without serious unemployment (= lost elections). But they always fail, because what they're trying to do (control, in a rational way, the most important price in an immensely complex market economy) is impossible. All the Fed can do is print so much that the current debt problem is delayed., or print somewhat less, and then react to the recession by printing that larger amount anyway. Anyway, recession or not, Fed reacting quickly enough or not to present stresses, the long-term situation is that the Fed is going to have to either allow total liquidation (politically impossible - see above), or go absolutely ape$#@! with money printing, to the point that last episode's QE will be not noticeable on a chart. And have no doubt; the Fed can and, if politically necessary, will, monetize every $#@!ing dollar denominated liability on planet Earth. Hyperinflation is preferable, politically, to liquidation.

ahhhh, your wet dream of an economic collapse.
 
only liberals who hate America want to complain about so called "QE", our economy is booming and there's nothing you can do about it.

DOW is up, 401Ks are up, people are getting tax cuts, job numbers are up, and all liberals can do is whine whine whine and cry like babies because they can't stand that a reality tv show host beat a woman who wanted to be President since she was a kid. Shame.

I agree liberals are whiners .
 
Good time to buy PM's right now, they should be up 20% in the next few years if the last QE event is anything to go by
 
You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to r3volution 3.0 again.

https://www.ccn.com/the-fed-just-blew-the-lid-on-the-next-financial-crisis/


The Federal Reserve’s intervention in the financial system reached truly epic proportions Thursday after the central bank’s New York division announced the largest series of repo operations ever.

The announcement came mere days after the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) painted a rosy picture of the U.S. economy in its final policy meeting of 2019. But what the Fed says and what it does are two completely different things.
Central bankers are admitting – by their actions, not words – that crisis is brewing in the financial sector.

The New York Fed announced Thursday it’s planning to inject almost half a trillion dollars into the overnight repo market through the new year, significantly increasing intervention to ensure short-term interest rates are kept in check. The plan includes providing an additional $425 billion in short-term funding to banks in dire need of cash.

As the Financial Times reports, the nuts and bolts of the operations include $120 billion in overnight repo up to Dec. 30 and in early January, alongside $175 billion in longer-term operations.

But if the repo market is truly broken, as evidenced by the banking sector’s dependence on daily liquidity injections, there’s a good chance it’ll spill over to the rest of the economy.

Where in the economy will it spill over to first? That's what I'd like to know.
 
Last edited:
only liberals who hate America want to complain about so called "QE", our economy is booming and there's nothing you can do about it.

lulz

The Federal Reserve’s intervention in the financial system reached truly epic proportions Thursday after the central bank’s New York division announced the largest series of repo operations ever.

That's because we have the greatest, healthiest, biggerest economy ever, of course.
 
If the economy is really booming, is stimulus necessary?

You got it backwards

1. the economy is booming BECAUSE stimulus
2. we want to keep it booming, that's why we invest more, there's no such thing as "enough"
3. Warren Buffett 101 : when the stock goes up, BUY MORE.
 
You got it backwards

1. the economy is booming BECAUSE stimulus
2. we want to keep it booming, that's why we invest more, there's no such thing as "enough"
3. Warren Buffett 101 : when the stock goes up, BUY MORE.

Trump wants negative interest rates and heuge QE so he can look amazing just in time for the election.
 
The Federal Reserve Bank of New York added $86.4 billion in liquidity to financial markets.

In two operations carried out Monday, the Fed injected $36.4 billion in overnight liquidity and $50 billion in 32-day liquidity extending into the coming New Year. Eligible banks took far less than the $120 billion the Fed was willing to offer in the overnight repurchase agreements, or repo, operation, while they wanted just slightly more long-term liquidity than the Fed was offering in the longer-term repo operation.

As of the most recent data from last week, the Fed reported that its balance sheet had risen to $4.1 trillion from $3.8 trillion in September. About $213 billion in repo interventions were also outstanding then. That amount of repo operations could rise to nearly half a trillion dollars if the eligible banks tap all the liquidity the central bank has said it would offer over coming days.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/new-yo...day-of-key-money-market-pressures-11576509343
 
Back
Top