QAnon is Tearing Families Apart

"Go check out the Council on Foreign Relations and who it works for." - Said no QAnon post ever

They talk about Rothschild and Soros A WHOLE LOT.

CFR is discussed somewhat, but CFR is mid level. Rothschild and Soros are above.There is something that is discussed a whole lot there, and never here. It's ANONYMOUS over there, and not here, not really. It's fully Free Speech there, and not here. The kind of Free Speech they have over there is pretty rare.

We had people attempting to derail political campaigns that were potentially winnable. RP in 07 and 11. Some we did assist in winning. Rand in 09.

Free speech hasnt been our focus here, although very little outside of agitation is removed. Banksters, Soros, Rothschilds, CFR kind of info has never been a topic that isn't allowed. Our forums are full of this data.
 
It's the abuse that tears families apart.

Except that it isn't. Stephan's argument is not to separate from the people he says are abusing you (the government) but separating from the people who support the people abusing you (your family who still thinks government is a legitimate institution).



So basically it's an argument for separating people based on what they believe rather than what they have done. Sounds like Jehovah's Witnesses.
 
This sounds like a set up piece for the planned banning of QAnon content on social media, which has already been announced. "See how damaging it is to our precious family units?" As if everything else that's destroyed the family unit fabric hasn't been perpetrated intentionally for decades with the help of WaPo.

Having said that, while QAnon is a psyop that successfully kept conservatives sitting on ass while sovereignty was sold off (USMCA) and budding "conspiracy theorists", who knew something wasn't right, chasing fake leads that went nowhere, there's nothing whatsoever wrong with storing food and water. There is a Depression forming, in case people haven't yet noticed the severe reduction in monetary circulation underway and the associated withdraw of currency from Main St. The Great Depression was brought on by the removal of ~33% of circulating currency. In that regard, if some people are prepping for a rough patch, even if prompted by the fake QAnon stuff, that is a good thing.

------------------------



As he then straps on his covid mask before getting into his car by himself to drive to the grocery store, where he is face scanned by a camera and told he can't pay with cash and that for his safety he has to stand 6 feet away from everyone else. He complies. He pays with an interest bearing credit card for a balance that the bank created out of thin air, drives back home and watches the face on the television tell him about how everyone around him is sick so he must allow an unknown substance to be injected into his body, while he eats his dinner made of lab chemicals and washes it down with a glass of fluoride filled tap water.

Yes, sanity. You gots it.
Q has more people resisting the masks etc. than ever would have without Q, Q has not gotten anyone to not do anything they would have otherwise done that they should have and has gotten many to do good things they would not have done without Q.
 
As we once again face an election, and as we reflect on the fact that this year more than any other since 1972, no one--no one--is voting for but rather literally everyone is voting against a presidential candidate because each party has literally shoved its absolute worst person through to the nomination, it's informative and sadly amusing to see the biggest proponents of "guard against divide and conquer tactics and think for yourself" QAnon are among the least able to express a coherent (much less original) thought, and are also the biggest proponents of judging figures not by their records but by their enemies.
LOL

Q has lots of virtues that can be pointed to and are pointed to.

But you make yet another of the right enemies to add to that part of the equation.

Q has done more for liberty than you ever pretended to and you show your true colors by attacking him.
 
Thank you Lord for ensuring that Trump won the Presidency in 2016, on the great feast day of St. Michael, the Archangel and Commander of the Angelic Army and victor over Satan.

May You also send Your blessings upon Trump and his administration for the upcoming election and ensure that he continues to lead our nation and protect it from enemies foreign and domestic.

May You also send Your blessings upon the members of the Q team who have done a masterful job at informing and educating the public on the threats this nation faces and the means by which those threats will be defeated.

Some think this is a horrible time to be alive. Rather, for those with eyes and ears, this is and has been an epic drama and a pedagogy on how modern day Patriots can fight and overcome against the most powerful forces in the world. A truly David verse Goliath battle unfolding of which history will remember as a great awakening.
 
Low hanging fruit that doesn't lead anywhere.



CFR takes their orders from British Royal Institute of International Affairs. Rothschild and Soros are media cut-outs to distract from the much larger network of think tanks that shape everything and hides the truth that Britain is still in control here on a daily basis. Never focus on the known knowns. They are put there for your consumption. Look for the unknown unknowns to see what's really going on.
The Brit Royals get attention from the Q community too.
Q has personally pointed to the Brits as an important part of the cabal and the coup attempts.
 
It's apparent why we need movements like Qanon to exist. We don't necessarily need Q or to have faith in them, but we do need to be fighting tooth and nail against the establishment and the media. Q accomplishes both of these goals, and you don't have to be a blind follower of theirs to see that. There are plenty of other useful YouTube channels out there that expose truth like Tim Pool, Jimmy Dore, and even Joe Rogan, but these people are also often wrong, especially in their political ideologies. It doesn't mean we need to be purity absolutists and disavow because they said one or many things that are invalid or incorrect, we can support truth in the places where they shine it and condemn lies and deceit when it exists as well.

Q is not destroying families. The establishment and banker elites are and have been since before we were born. The focus needs to be there. Threads like this are attempts to distract from what we all know is the real fight.

To the people going after Q, where were you in the Ron Paul campaign years? We are fighting the exact same thing and trying to search for truth, which is precisely what Ron Paul always and will stand for. Seems like a waste of time to spend energy attacking a movement like this searching for truth when we have so many bigger problems, like a small group of wealthy people that are trying to control every single aspect of our lives. It would be no different than going after 9/11 truthers during the RP years. Many of those people joined the movement, and no one questioned them and said they are bad for society, now we have plenty of libertarians questioning people with almost the exact same goals as those truthers, because the new truth movement is associated with Trump. The transparency on the behavior change is striking and people aren't buying it.
 
Has anyone, on a forum dedicated to Ron Paul, ever heard about him or his Senator son ever make a disparaging comment about Q? Surely they know that Q exists if we do. After all, dc swamp creatures are introducing bills to villainize it. In fact, if I recall correctly, Rand defended the supporters of Q after the establishment accused them of promoting and inciting violence.

Serous question, because I don’t pretend to know everything Ron and Rand have said. Just wondering if they ever made a direct comment about it. For some reason, I believe, that if either of them thought this was a big hoax or illegitimate or certainly a threat to families or this nation, they would have at least at some point warned the American people.
 
It would be no different than going after 9/11 truthers during the RP years. Many of those people joined the movement, and no one questioned them and said they are bad for society, now we have plenty of libertarians questioning people with almost the exact same goals as those truthers, because the new truth movement is associated with Trump. The transparency on the behavior change is striking and people aren't buying it.

The flamewars that started by people attacking 9/11 truthers is what caused Hot Topics to be a thing. I've seen FAR more acceptance of QAnon here than I ever did for 9/11 Truthers when Ron Paul was running for office. I'm not sure how you missed that.
 
I don’t think anyone can find a more concentrated area currently on the internet of 911 truthers than on the Q board.
 
Low hanging fruit that doesn't lead anywhere.



CFR takes their orders from British Royal Institute of International Affairs. Rothschild and Soros are media cut-outs to distract from the much larger network of think tanks that shape everything and hides the truth that Britain is still in control here on a daily basis. Never focus on the known knowns. They are put there for your consumption. Look for the unknown unknowns to see what's really going on.

Soros DOESN'T LEAD ANYWHERE???

How is that?

Soros gives money to Antifa, Soros gives tons of money to DAs in places like St Louis.

It's totally wrong to say Soros isn't relevant. And I'm not saying that CFR isn't relevant.

The Q boards are more pissed off and more over the target than here. Here has a lot of Democrats pushing Washington Post stories and it's tolerated.

Rothschild funded Soros, The Balfour Declaration was the Brits giving Palestine to Rothschild. Most people know very little about Rothschild. Who owns the Fed exactly?
 
Soros DOESN'T LEAD ANYWHERE???

How is that?

Soros gives money to Antifa, Soros gives tons of money to DAs in places like St Louis.

Soros is a media character, a strawman, a cut-out, a limited hang-out, whatever term you prefer. A name (George Soros isn't even his real name) and face with no address, no location, essentially someone for you to be mad at but without any way whatsoever to act upon your anger. Same with the Rothschilds, generally. OTOH, the Committee of 300 stays nicely hidden while a couple of widely known names capture all of the anger. The CFR has office addresses here. But instead attention is directed at ethereal characters that are only a tiny part of the bigger machine.
 
We had people attempting to derail political campaigns that were potentially winnable. RP in 07 and 11. Some we did assist in winning. Rand in 09.

Free speech hasnt been our focus here, although very little outside of agitation is removed. Banksters, Soros, Rothschilds, CFR kind of info has never been a topic that isn't allowed. Our forums are full of this data.

I haven't mentioned here the thing that we can't talk about here that is talked about more than Banksters, Soros, Rothschilds, CFR. And it might not be something that is banned, but it's something that people who aren't quite anonymous generally aren't going to talk about.

I'm of the opinion that it's the same group of people in both places. Outsider GOP. And some outsider GOP candidate or movement gets hot, and then cools down, and the same people, the same type of people move on to the next hot thing. All the outsider GOP candidates or movement have pretty much all are in agreement about who the bad guys are, they might put them in different orders, but they're not going to say the bad guys are good guys. And there can be differences of opinion on things like tariffs, which were liked by outsider GOP like Buchanan and Trump.

There really isn't anything all that different between Q Anons in 2020 and Ron Paul supporters in 2007. Or Goldwater and the John Birch Society 50-60 years ago.
 
Soros is a media character, a strawman, a cut-out, a limited hang-out, whatever term you prefer. A name (George Soros isn't even his real name) and face with no address, no location, essentially someone for you to be mad at but without any way whatsoever to act upon your anger. Same with the Rothschilds, generally. OTOH, the Committee of 300 stays nicely hidden while a couple of widely known names capture all of the anger. The CFR has office addresses here. But instead attention is directed at ethereal characters that are only a tiny part of the bigger machine.

Right. So let's start at the bottom with these limited hangouts, educate people on what their role is and how there are more powerful people backing them financially, whether it's Soros or the Rothschild's or the British royalty and move the ball forward. Telling people "just give it all up" is the number 1 way to fail and not everyone is at our level of knowledge right now. We all had to take a journey from believing in the system to seeing it for the dark destructive force that it actually is. Encouragement is how you do this. Discouraging people to look because they don't have the entire thing figured out at step 1 will demoralize and reduce enthusiasm and interest in these topics.
 
Soros is a media character, a strawman, a cut-out, a limited hang-out, whatever term you prefer. A name (George Soros isn't even his real name) and face with no address, no location, essentially someone for you to be mad at but without any way whatsoever to act upon your anger. Same with the Rothschilds, generally. OTOH, the Committee of 300 stays nicely hidden while a couple of widely known names capture all of the anger. The CFR has office addresses here. But instead attention is directed at ethereal characters that are only a tiny part of the bigger machine.

All of that is totally wrong.

George Soros and the Rothschilds are REAL PEOPLE.

Interesting theory you have - the only bad people who should be stopped are competely invisible and you can't find them.

Soros lives in Westchester County, New York. These aren't fake people.

Soros is a TERRORIST and he should be treated by the US Government like they should be dealing with TERRORISTS.

Rothschild has been around, super famous and super rich for 200 years. You're talking about organizations that have people in them, those organizations are bad, sure, and you should include Bilderberg in there as well, but there are Billionaires, there really are, who are funding the awfulness.

Who owns the Fed? We never really got the answer to that. I think that we can all say that the big big owners of the Fed are the bad guys. I'd say Rothschild owns the Fed. How about the people in the CFR? Are they the ones who own the Fed? Or Rothschild, and probably Schiff as well.

You don't know anywhere near as much about Rothschild as you think you do if you think that Rothschild is merely a public face for something else.
 
Right. So let's start at the bottom with these limited hangouts, educate people on what their role is and how there are more powerful people backing them financially, whether it's Soros or the Rothschild's or the British royalty and move the ball forward. Telling people "just give it all up" is the number 1 way to fail and not everyone is at our level of knowledge right now. We all had to take a journey from believing in the system to seeing it for the dark destructive force that it actually is. Encouragement is how you do this. Discouraging people to look because they don't have the entire thing figured out at step 1 will demoralize and reduce enthusiasm and interest in these topics.
Demanding that everyone make the leap into the deepest rabbit holes is also a way to prevent anyone form ever waking up, most people have their own slow pace at which they learn and if you push them too far too fast they will reflexively reject you and refuse to learn.
 
Right. So let's start at the bottom with these limited hangouts, educate people on what their role is and how there are more powerful people backing them financially, whether it's Soros or the Rothschild's or the British royalty and move the ball forward. Telling people "just give it all up" is the number 1 way to fail and not everyone is at our level of knowledge right now. We all had to take a journey from believing in the system to seeing it for the dark destructive force that it actually is. Encouragement is how you do this. Discouraging people to look because they don't have the entire thing figured out at step 1 will demoralize and reduce enthusiasm and interest in these topics.

What you're saying sounds right.

And pushing people away from the close examination of Rothschild is wrong.

Israel is Rothschild's country - given to him by Britain.

Rothschild funded Soros, is above Soros, everything that Soros does is for Rothschild.


Who else, over generations, centuries, has a resume like that?
 
You are blatantly wrong. From the start. November 2017.


https://qposts.online/post/72

Disinformation is real.
Distractions are necessary.


November 2017 is definitely not the start.

https://qposts.online/post/1

HRC extradition already in motion effective yesterday with several countries in case of cross border run. Passport approved to be flagged effective 10/30 @ 12:01am. Expect massive riots organized in defiance and others fleeing the US to occur. US M’s will conduct the operation while NG activated. Proof check: Locate a NG member and ask if activated for duty 10/30 across most major cities.

https://qposts.online/post/15

11.3 - Podesta indicted
11.6 - Huma indicted

Q already had to explain failed predictions by the time he made your post.



Also, you left out the context of the post that you linked. It was a response to this:

WAIT
WAIT
WAIT

GO BACK TO THE POST ABOUT THE FAMILES THAT RUN EVERYTHING AND TRUMP TAKING ONE OUT

WAS ONE OF THEM THIS SAUDI FAMILY

SERIOUSLY

BECAUSE THAT MAKES THIS A HAPPENING

I Remember the phrasing not making sense, I was like "oh does he mean that dt took out the Clintons?" But the Clintons were on the list as remaining so I didn't know who was taken out

The person who Q was responding to was kind enough to both point out a connection between a random event and a previous Q post, and also provide a potential re-interpretation / correction of that post which would make it (sort of) make sense. Q latched on to that to agree to it.


Here's the original post:
There are more good people than bad. The wizards and warlocks (inside term) will not allow another Satanic Evil POS control our country. Realize Soros, Clintons, Obama, Putin, etc. are all controlled by 3 families (the 4th was removed post Trump's victory).

https://qposts.online/post/15



What Q was agreeing with, in saying that disinformation is real and distractions are necessary, is that the Saudi royal family had been taken out.

Had they? Have they?
 
Last edited:
Right. So let's start at the bottom with these limited hangouts, educate people on what their role is and how there are more powerful people backing them financially, whether it's Soros or the Rothschild's or the British royalty and move the ball forward. Telling people "just give it all up" is the number 1 way to fail and not everyone is at our level of knowledge right now. We all had to take a journey from believing in the system to seeing it for the dark destructive force that it actually is. Encouragement is how you do this. Discouraging people to look because they don't have the entire thing figured out at step 1 will demoralize and reduce enthusiasm and interest in these topics.

I agree with you, but where the Q stuff has been so successful is keeping budding "CT types" chasing after the same public villains over and over, like the Coyote chasing Roadrunner. Who's winning in that duel? *ACME* is the winner ;)

The Rothschilds definitely have their place in history, of course and are still very much involved in current affairs, but I'm reminded of the street confrontation video where Jacob R. himself says that his importance is greatly exaggerated. He meant that his family is but a single cog today. IOW, Rothschild and Soros is merely CT 101 and is only the bare surface put out for public consumption. Admittedly I haven't followed the Q stuff closely, since I knew it was bs the moment it emerged after Trump was installed (who was promptly surrounded by CFR swampers like every other President and appointed Goldman, Rothschild, Harvard, Vatican henchmen), Q has kept people mostly looking at the surface and wasting time with cryptic messages that everyone was trying to decode. Of course, everyone had a different interpretation of a "drop" and nothing cohesive or concrete (action-based) ever came out of it. The rest of American sovereignty was sold out in the meantime, however.
 
Last edited:
I agree with you, but where the Q stuff has been so successful is keeping budding "CT types" chasing after the same public villains over and over, like the Coyote chasing Roadrunner. Who's winning in that duel? *ACME* is the winner ;)

The Rothschilds definitely have their place in history, of course and are still very much involved in current affairs, but I'm reminded of the street confrontation video where Jacob R. himself says that his importance is greatly exaggerated. He meant that his family is but a single cog today. IOW, Rothschild and Soros is merely CT 101 and is only the bare surface put out for public consumption. Admittedly I haven't followed the Q stuff closely, since I knew it was bs the moment it emerged after Trump was installed (who was promptly surrounded by CFR swampers like every other President and appointed Goldman, Rothschild, Harvard, Vatican henchmen), Q has kept people mostly looking at the surface and wasting time with cryptic messages that everyone was trying to decode. Of course, everyone had a different interpretation of a "drop" and nothing cohesive or concrete (action-based) ever came out of it. The rest of American sovereignty was sold out in the meantime, however.

You have no idea what you are talking about.

Q has people diving deeper than they ever would have without him.
 
Back
Top