Putting money on Harris

[Snowball]

Israel is timing this so that they will have results of US election before deciding whether or not to nuke Iran. But they don't know that the election is already a done deal.

This is why I think Harris will win. Deep State is going to rig it.

Trump would bless the nuking of Iran, and promise trillions to rebuild Israel and commit the full force of US to reshape the Middle East.

Deep State (agencies) and Shadow Gov (COG/UFO) are not going to cede power to Band Israel. They have already spoken via the Pentagon.

They will manage Harris, let her in one some details, and handle the whole transition.

I am sure that Homeland, DOJ, CIA, FBI considers this a National Emergency to rig the election for Harris and that decision was made around the time Biden withdrew.

It's actually the only reason Biden dropped out. He was TOLD it's a fix and Trump can't win.

I have successfully picked every presidential election winner in my adult lifetime. I didn't vote for hardly any of them, but as a handicapper I chose them, like you would pick a team in a game but not be a fan.

 

[Anti Globalist]

Trump supporters should bet their whole bank accounts if they’re so confident he’s going to win. Oh wait, they’re too chicken shit to do it because they know what the results are going to be.

 

[69360]

Harris has practically zero chance of winning the electoral college. About as much chance as Isreal using a nuclear weapon.

 

[spudea]

Trump would bless the nuking of Iran, and promise trillions to rebuild Israel and commit the full force of US to reshape the Middle East.....

I have successfully picked every presidential election winner in my adult lifetime. I didn't vote for hardly any of them, but as a handicapper I chose them, like you would pick a team in a game but not be a fan.

This is ridiculous. If Trump is President, there is no reason to nuke Iran. Iran was weakened severely during his term and would be again if re-elected without the need for direct military action. Biden/Harris have been a huge benefit to Iran and their proxies.

You should hope your pick for a Harris win is wrong.

 

[spudea]

Trump supporters should bet their whole bank accounts if they’re so confident he’s going to win. Oh wait, they’re too chicken $#@! to do it because they know what the results are going to be.

I'm happy to engage in a friendly wager. I'll put some money on it. Not my whole bank account because of the risk of fraud.

 

[CaptUSA]

Yeah, it’s all conjecture at this point. No one believes this will be a “fair” election, so it’s a matter of how much cheating and where. On both sides.

The curiouser thing is the response after the media declares a winner.

 

[mtr1979]

This would be an excellent thread to put a poll on. It should be titled: Who will win the presidential election?
It isn't who you are voting for or who you want to win. If I had to put money on who is going to win I would have to say Harris because it isn't a fair race. The media bias obviously favors Harris. Also have you looked around at the people who vote? Then you have to wake up an accept the fact it is rigged. They can never let what happened in 2016 take place again.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Trump would bless the nuking of Iran, and promise trillions to rebuild Israel and commit the full force of US to reshape the Middle East.

It's actually the only reason Biden dropped out. He was TOLD it's a fix and Trump can't win.

A total lie and an irrational concept.
Trump would not do anything like what you claim.
Biden would have stayed if the fix was assured.

 

[GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged]

What good is the Government if the elections are rigged?
There doesn't seem to be a "peaceful protest" solution to the issues.
It is like going to the bank with your paycheck and depositing it. You get a receipt but the next day your balance is zero.

 

[WarriorLiberty]

Harris has zero chances

Why are you some clowns hoping she wins?
Harris is not anti war nor is Trump i would rather have Trump over Harris.


If she wins goodbye freedom of speech

 

[WarriorLiberty]

Trump supporters should bet their whole bank accounts if they’re so confident he’s going to win. Oh wait, they’re too chicken $#@! to do it because they know what the results are going to be.

Well if you are confident in harris put that money on Harris why dont you?

 

[acptulsa]

Well if you are confident in harris put that money on Harris why dont you?

Depends on the odds. 5:1 hardly keeps up with inflation any more.

 

[Snowball]

example odds at an offshore.

2024 Presidential Election - Odds to Win
06:10 am

Donald Trump Sr.
-165


Kamala Harris
+145


Any Other
+5000


Election Winner to Lose Popular Vote?
06:15 am

No
-165


Yes
+125

Popular Vote - Margin of Victory
06:15 am

Harris 0-2.49%
+200


Trump 0-2.49%
+250


Harris 2.50-4.99%
+275


Trump 2.50-4.99%
+700


Harris 5.00-7.49%
+850


Harris 7.50-9.99%
+2000


Harris 10% or Higher
+2500


Trump 5.00-7.49%
+2800


Trump 7.50-9.99%
+8000


Trump 10% or Higher
+10000

President: Popular Vote Winner
06:15 am

Kamala Harris
-250


Donald Trump
+210


Any Other
+7500

 

[Snowball]

There are indications Blinken's talk is helping Israel change its mind on the scope of attack.*

Iranian news agency SNN has quoted the IRGC commander Jafari that Tehran expects a "limited and small" attack.

They probably heard this from the U.S.

 

[Snowball]

"large-scale cybersecurity exercise on Election Day"

https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/media/...ion-at-election-day-cybersecurity-conference/

Nov. 5, ELECTION DAY, there will be a special cybersecurity exercise at the Conference.

Get this. The exercise is described as a large-scale interactive event, with participants from federal, state, county, city government agencies, academia, and industry.

The exercise will simulate a cyber-attack on “critical infrastructure.”

https://jonrappoport.substack.com/p/major-national-cybersecurity-exercise-on-election-day

https://atlanta.afceachapters.org/2024-homeland-security-critical-infrastructure-conference

 

[A. Havnes]

Harris has zero chances

Why are you some clowns hoping she wins?
Harris is not anti war nor is Trump i would rather have Trump over Harris.


If she wins goodbye freedom of speech

Harris' zero chances are why I'm afraid of election fraud. That being said, I agree that I'll take Trump over her in a heartbeat.

 

[WarriorLiberty]

Harris' zero chances are why I'm afraid of election fraud. That being said, I agree that I'll take Trump over her in a heartbeat.

As for Putin saying he prefers Harris over Trump well honestly.
I think the Russians were getting tired of hearing that Trump is connected to Putin or Russia. So they wanted to distance themselves.

Its True Trump didnt stop the war in Ukraine. But Harris would be far worse.

 

[Occam's Banana]

What good is the Government if the elections are rigged?

What good is the Government even if the elections are not rigged?

 

[GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged]

What good is the Government even if the elections are not rigged?

If they were not rigged at least your vote could be meaningful if you had decent candidates.
Rigging elections removes all hope.

 

[Occam's Banana]

If they were not rigged at least your vote could be meaningful if you had decent candidates.

IOW: "If there weren't bad things going on, then things would be good if there were good things going on."

Okay, sure.

I guess I can't really argue with that.

LOL

Rigging elections removes all hope.

Go tell it to those fellows who made it through Valley Forge and then lived to see Yorktown.

If you require the process of sticking marked-up pieces of paper into magic wishing boxes (or the computerized equivalent of such) to be "unrigged" in order to have any hope at all, then you're right where the election-riggers want you, and you've already lost.

Speaking for myself, I would have no problems with rigged elections - if they were rigged to favor the right candidates. If the result was Ron-Paul-like candidates ending up in office, I would be 110% a-okay with rigging the ever-lovin' hell out of elections - and if doing so would render your vote (or anyone else's) "meaningless" (whatever that's supposed to mean), then that's a price I'd be happy to pay. In fact, I'd consider it to be an excellent bargain. (It really is too bad that's not actually going to happen, though - more's the pity.)