Publishing Company Puts a Disclaimer on the Constitution

MichelleHeart

Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2009
Messages
317
For more, click here.

My take: A Disclaimer on the U.S. Constitution?

constitution_monster_397x224.jpg
 
Last edited:
I find that in my interpersonal relations there is often a partial or complete absence of a recognition of truth in the other party.
Thanks publishing company... but my 3-year-old daughter already knows that I don't like liars and cheats and people who don't deal honestly with me.

The difference is that I won't try to convince my kids that there was ever a time when people actually did deal honestly with each other, and that the historical record shows that the constitution was a fucking joke from the beginning.

So despite the warning, interpersonal relations haven't changed a bit.
 
I thought it was gonna read: “Seller assumes no liability for damages sustained from Homeland Security putting the purchaser on a list of potential terrorists.”
 
I thought it was gonna read: “Seller assumes no liability for damages sustained from Homeland Security putting the purchaser on a list of potential terrorists.”

+1984

I still find it fascinating that the supreme law of the land is considered to be subversive. Strange days.
 
I thought they added it so parents could explain the racist parts of the constitution to them.
 
I thought they added it so parents could explain the racist parts of the constitution to them.

That's what I was thinking too. Of course, I don't know if they have the racist parts in this particular version.
 
Back
Top